Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 56 of 56

Thread: several Clinton donors are jurist in Sussman trial

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,859
    Thanks
    13,250
    Thanked 40,795 Times in 32,158 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    No it isn't. Being a foreman on a jury doesn't make you an expert. That's obvious in your case. The size of juries is determined by the type of charge. And jurors can be struck for no reason by either side, but they are limited in the number of strikes they are allowed. Only a judge can determine bias. But that point is moot. This case has nothing, NOTHING to do with Hillary Clinton. The fact that dukkha and you think it does shows just how ignorant you are.
    wtf......who was Sussman working for when he lied to the FBI?......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (05-20-2022), Earl (05-21-2022)

  3. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,030
    Thanks
    9,532
    Thanked 22,520 Times in 16,980 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    I can read. You should try it.
    Then learn comprehension.
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to RB 60 For This Post:

    Earl (05-21-2022)

  5. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    That's exactly how it works. I was the foreman on a Federal case some years ago.
    Poor Dick strikes again.

  6. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    I can read. You should try it.
    Bullshitter extraordinaire.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cancel2 2022 For This Post:

    dukkha (05-20-2022), Earl (05-21-2022)

  8. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    NOTHING to do with Hillary Clinton. The fact that dukkha and you think it does shows just how ignorant you are.[/B]

    that post didn't even last the day

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (05-21-2022), Earl (05-21-2022)

  10. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    41,799
    Thanks
    26,777
    Thanked 19,971 Times in 14,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,422
    Groaned 949 Times in 933 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    I can read. You should try it.
    Dick and Jane primers don't count.
    IMPEACH 46 FOR TREASON
    Biden/Harris 2024
    IT'S A NO BRAINER!


  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ExpressLane For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (05-21-2022), Earl (05-21-2022), RB 60 (05-20-2022)

  12. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,405 Times in 9,440 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    Then learn comprehension.
    Already learned. The number of jurors is set by law. Only the judge can strike for bias. These are facts. They don’t change because you were a foreman on a jury. Again try reading. Maybe you won’t make a fool of yourself next time.

  13. The Following 2 Users Groan At Concart For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (05-21-2022), Earl (05-21-2022)

  14. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,030
    Thanks
    9,532
    Thanked 22,520 Times in 16,980 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    Already learned. The number of jurors is set by law. Only the judge can strike for bias. These are facts. They don’t change because you were a foreman on a jury. Again try reading. Maybe you won’t make a fool of yourself next time.
    Uh, wrong! Either attorney can reject a juror for any reason he/she wants while picking a jury. Why do you think there is 30-40 (or more) people summoned for jury duty if they only need 12 plus alternates? Just for shits and giggles?
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RB 60 For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (05-21-2022), Earl (05-21-2022)

  16. #54 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,405 Times in 9,440 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    Uh, wrong! Either attorney can reject a juror for any reason he/she wants while picking a jury. Why do you think there is 30-40 (or more) people summoned for jury duty if they only need 12 plus alternates? Just for shits and giggles?
    Nope. Attorneys have a limited number of pre-emptory strikes, and they are not based on bias. The number is set by law. So apparently you can't read. Because this is what I said. It is a fact. ONLY THE JUDGE CAN REMOVE A JUROR FOR BIAS. Period. Full stop. I guess they let anyone be a foreman these days.

    Learn to read. It will aide you in your future endeavors.

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_24

  17. #55 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,030
    Thanks
    9,532
    Thanked 22,520 Times in 16,980 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    Nope. Attorneys have a limited number of pre-emptory strikes, and they are not based on bias. The number is set by law. So apparently you can't read. Because this is what I said. It is a fact. ONLY THE JUDGE CAN REMOVE A JUROR FOR BIAS. Period. Full stop. I guess they let anyone be a foreman these days.

    Learn to read. It will aide you in your future endeavors.

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_24
    I said when the prosecution and defense are picking the jury.
    I said nothing about removing a juror who was already selected to sit on the jury.
    Again, how many juries were you on? I was on one Federal, one criminal and one
    civil paternity (which I will never sit on again because of the bias) case. I brought
    that up to the judge at the Federal case, which he assured me it was not a paternity
    case (it was a triple murder case). That trial lasted 3 weeks. I summoned the judge
    numerous times for answers to questions a few other jurors had asked.
    Read all you want, but don't tell me what I've experienced first hand when you
    apparently never served on a jury.
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  18. #56 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,405 Times in 9,440 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    I said when the prosecution and defense are picking the jury.
    I said nothing about removing a juror who was already selected to sit on the jury.
    Again, how many juries were you on? I was on one Federal, one criminal and one
    civil paternity (which I will never sit on again because of the bias) case. I brought
    that up to the judge at the Federal case, which he assured me it was not a paternity
    case (it was a triple murder case). That trial lasted 3 weeks. I summoned the judge
    numerous times for answers to questions a few other jurors had asked.
    Read all you want, but don't tell me what I've experienced first hand when you
    apparently never served on a jury.
    Yes, I'm also talking about that. You get your strikes. If you want someone else disqualified, ONLY THE JUDGE CAN DO THAT. This isn't rocket science. Your appeal to authority is lame. Your experience means nothing. I posted the applicable statute. Read it.

Similar Threads

  1. because no one else did.......the Sussman trial.....
    By PostmodernProphet in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-19-2022, 06:29 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-21-2021, 07:31 AM
  3. Clinton Donors Charged in Massive Campaign-Finance Scheme
    By Grokmaster in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-05-2019, 11:29 PM
  4. Many Donors to Clinton Foundation met with her at State
    By anatta in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-23-2016, 06:06 PM
  5. Deep-Pocket Clinton Donors Return to the Fore
    By anatta in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 07-29-2016, 11:16 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •