Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 56

Thread: several Clinton donors are jurist in Sussman trial

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,405 Times in 9,440 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    And your experience on a Federal jury or the selection process is...?
    I can read. You should try it.

  2. The Following User Groans At Concart For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (05-20-2022)

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Concart For This Post:

    evince (05-20-2022)

  4. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,649
    Thanks
    9,766
    Thanked 33,617 Times in 21,480 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    This jury pool is a nightmare for the prosecutors. There are three Clinton donors on the jury. In the last 24 hours, the judge turned down a motion to dismiss a juror whose daughter is actually playing on the same team with the daughter of Sussmann. So I think for the prosecutors, it seems like the only thing that is missing on the jury is Chelsea Clinton. A jury of your peers is not supposed to mean other Clinton people.
    And so, I think that the prosecutors have quite a challenge with this pool.
    https://www.foxnews.com/media/turley...re-prosecutors
    Why do you think the Prosecutors allowed so many Clinton donors on the jury? Your kid being on the same team as o/c's kid is certainty not a reason for disqualification.
    4,487

    18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
    44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.


    LOCK HIM UP!

  5. The Following User Groans At Jarod For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (05-20-2022)

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    evince (05-20-2022)

  7. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,958
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,036 Times in 13,846 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    This jury pool is a nightmare for the prosecutors. There are three Clinton donors on the jury. In the last 24 hours, the judge turned down a motion to dismiss a juror whose daughter is actually playing on the same team with the daughter of Sussmann. So I think for the prosecutors, it seems like the only thing that is missing on the jury is Chelsea Clinton. A jury of your peers is not supposed to mean other Clinton people.
    And so, I think that the prosecutors have quite a challenge with this pool.
    https://www.foxnews.com/media/turley...re-prosecutors
    Oh, oh, I sense the “jury is fixed” rants are predictable if Durham doesn’t get what he wants, shades of 2020, like Trump shouting the Iowa primary was fixed beforehand cause he knew Cruz was going to win, same playbook

    If I am not mistaken, in any trial, the prosecutor, along with the defense, picks the jury, they question each candidate from the pool and decide who sits on the jury, in other words, Durham agreed with this jury

    Will there ever be another election in America where if the Republican candidate loses they won’t yell “fixed?”

  8. The Following User Groans At archives For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (05-20-2022)

  9. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    41,796
    Thanks
    26,777
    Thanked 19,968 Times in 14,555 Posts
    Groans
    1,422
    Groaned 949 Times in 933 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    Link
    Today's testimony just announced on Fox as breaking news so too new for a link as of yet.
    IMPEACH 46 FOR TREASON
    Biden/Harris 2024
    IT'S A NO BRAINER!


  10. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,465
    Thanks
    16,662
    Thanked 20,734 Times in 14,330 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Richard Saunders View Post
    Neither Clinton or Trump are on trial. Sussmann is charged with lying to the FBI.
    All this frother BS about Clinton people being on the jury is just an attempt to hide the fact that Durham has no case.
    They didn't mind when a biased judge let Rittenhouse off. They didn't mind when someone directly connected to Zimmerman, and lied her way onto the jury was allowed. They love when jury nullification works for them.

    They hate it when it works for anyone else.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Althea For This Post:

    evince (05-20-2022)

  12. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    36,465
    Thanks
    16,662
    Thanked 20,734 Times in 14,330 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,387 Times in 1,305 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Richard Saunders View Post
    The defense got to ask Baker about all the other times he testified differently while under oath. Somehow I don't think Baker is a reliable witness since he now remembers clearly something that happened over 6 years ago but doesn't remember what happened the day after when they talked on the phone.

    Baker was also under investigation by Durham so has every reason to lie for Durham to prevent being prosecuted. It's amazing how you don't know any of the facts in this case.
    They love to whine, whine, whine.

    Four treasonous pieces of crap were pardoned by trump. Add to that a handul of convicted Republicans who used their positions in the House for financial gain.

    Not a whimper from them.
    Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Althea For This Post:

    evince (05-20-2022)

  14. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  15. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    The judge decides in the end


    You know the person running the court


    But the judge should recuse if their spouse is involved in the case dont you think?


    They didn’t even get this comment


    What Rubes

  16. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Oh, oh, I sense the “jury is fixed” rants are predictable if Durham doesn’t get what he wants, shades of 2020, like Trump shouting the Iowa primary was fixed beforehand cause he knew Cruz was going to win, same playbook

    If I am not mistaken, in any trial, the prosecutor, along with the defense, picks the jury, they question each candidate from the pool and decide who sits on the jury, in other words, Durham agreed with this jury

    Will there ever be another election in America where if the Republican candidate loses they won’t yell “fixed?”
    jury process:
    the “voir dire” process — in which dozens of potential jurors were questioned by the judge, the prosecution, and the defense — lasted almost the full day, and a full jury was finalized Monday evening. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...are-appearance

    the "pool" was attorneys / federal employees and retirees
    The jury has 3 Dem donor and 1 Republican donor

    whatever happened to ordinary lay people??

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (05-20-2022)

  18. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Why do you think the Prosecutors allowed so many Clinton donors on the jury? Your kid being on the same team as o/c's kid is certainty not a reason for disqualification.
    donors are inherent advocates. The judge shouldn't allow any
    It's typical DC insiders ruling on other DC insiders.
    If you know the facts of the case there is no doubt Sussman was lying.
    Text and Baker testimony back they up.

    But I bet you he'll walk -same as the Comey, McCabe ( who got his pension back) etc

  19. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,846
    Thanks
    13,245
    Thanked 40,785 Times in 32,151 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    this is gaining momentum.....
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  20. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,578
    Thanks
    18,197
    Thanked 15,614 Times in 10,679 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 617 Times in 606 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    This jury pool is a nightmare for the prosecutors. There are three Clinton donors on the jury. In the last 24 hours, the judge turned down a motion to dismiss a juror whose daughter is actually playing on the same team with the daughter of Sussmann. So I think for the prosecutors, it seems like the only thing that is missing on the jury is Chelsea Clinton. A jury of your peers is not supposed to mean other Clinton people.
    And so, I think that the prosecutors have quite a challenge with this pool.
    https://www.foxnews.com/media/turley...re-prosecutors
    Blatant 14th Amendment violation.
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  21. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,846
    Thanks
    13,245
    Thanked 40,785 Times in 32,151 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Concart View Post
    I'm pretty sure political contributions don't disqualify you for jury duty. Anatta continues to be one of the whiniest, lamest, dumbest posters here.
    I wonder if people who donated to a Go Fund Me account for an accused murderer can sit on his jury.......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  22. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,846
    Thanks
    13,245
    Thanked 40,785 Times in 32,151 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Althea View Post
    They didn't mind when a biased judge let Rittenhouse off. They didn't mind when someone directly connected to Zimmerman, and lied her way onto the jury was allowed. They love when jury nullification works for them.

    They hate it when it works for anyone else.
    don't recall that......what was this direct connection you refer to?......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  23. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    In the last 24 hours, the judge turned down a motion to dismiss a juror whose daughter is actually playing on the same team with the daughter of Sussmann.
    unreal. the fix is in

Similar Threads

  1. because no one else did.......the Sussman trial.....
    By PostmodernProphet in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-19-2022, 06:29 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-21-2021, 07:31 AM
  3. Clinton Donors Charged in Massive Campaign-Finance Scheme
    By Grokmaster in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-05-2019, 11:29 PM
  4. Many Donors to Clinton Foundation met with her at State
    By anatta in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-23-2016, 06:06 PM
  5. Deep-Pocket Clinton Donors Return to the Fore
    By anatta in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 07-29-2016, 11:16 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •