Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Court rules SEC’s internal judges are unconstitutional

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,347
    Thanks
    6,677
    Thanked 12,316 Times in 9,824 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Court rules SEC’s internal judges are unconstitutional

    The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday ruled the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is denying defendants their constitutional right to a jury trial by putting them in front of its own internal judges.

    In a 2-1 ruling, the court ruled for George Jarkesy and Patriot28 LLC, who sued the SEC in 2011 after the agency imposed a $300,000 fine and other punishments in a securities fraud case.

    Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod wrote in the majority opinion that the SEC violated the Seventh Amendment’s right to a jury trial by bringing defendants before in-house judges and allowing the agency to “act as both prosecutor and judge.”

    Congress also unconstitutionally delegated power to the SEC to act as a legislative body, Elrod wrote.

    “‘We the People’ are the fountainhead of all government power. Through the Constitution, the people delegated some of that power to the federal government so that it would protect rights and promote the common good,” Elrod said. “But that accountability evaporates if a person or entity other than Congress exercises legislative power.”

    In a dissenting opinion, Judge Eugene Davis disagreed, saying the right to a jury trial did not pertain to administrative proceedings and that the SEC was enforcing laws and statutes in the public interest.

    Davis also said Congress did not overreach in empowering the SEC to enforce action through its administrative proceedings.


    The ruling comes two days after the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to a hear a separate but similar case involving the SEC’s administrative powers and in-house judges in a suit brought by Texas accountant Michelle Cochran.

    In the 5th Circuit case, Jarkesy created two hedge funds and selected Patriot28 as an investment adviser. In 2011, the SEC brought action against Jarkesy and Patriot28, accusing them of overvaluing their investment fund and misrepresenting data to attract investors.

    An administrative law judge within the SEC ruled that Jarkesy and Patriot28 had committed securities fraud, as did the SEC’s internal commission.


    https://thehill.com/regulation/court...onstitutional/

    maybe the republic is restored?

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Blackwater Lunchbreak For This Post:

    ExpressLane (05-20-2022), Matt Dillon (05-21-2022), PostmodernProphet (05-20-2022)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,200
    Thanks
    9,669
    Thanked 22,599 Times in 17,043 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday ruled the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is denying defendants their constitutional right to a jury trial by putting them in front of its own internal judges.

    In a 2-1 ruling, the court ruled for George Jarkesy and Patriot28 LLC, who sued the SEC in 2011 after the agency imposed a $300,000 fine and other punishments in a securities fraud case.

    Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod wrote in the majority opinion that the SEC violated the Seventh Amendment’s right to a jury trial by bringing defendants before in-house judges and allowing the agency to “act as both prosecutor and judge.”

    Congress also unconstitutionally delegated power to the SEC to act as a legislative body, Elrod wrote.

    “‘We the People’ are the fountainhead of all government power. Through the Constitution, the people delegated some of that power to the federal government so that it would protect rights and promote the common good,” Elrod said. “But that accountability evaporates if a person or entity other than Congress exercises legislative power.”

    In a dissenting opinion, Judge Eugene Davis disagreed, saying the right to a jury trial did not pertain to administrative proceedings and that the SEC was enforcing laws and statutes in the public interest.

    Davis also said Congress did not overreach in empowering the SEC to enforce action through its administrative proceedings.


    The ruling comes two days after the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to a hear a separate but similar case involving the SEC’s administrative powers and in-house judges in a suit brought by Texas accountant Michelle Cochran.

    In the 5th Circuit case, Jarkesy created two hedge funds and selected Patriot28 as an investment adviser. In 2011, the SEC brought action against Jarkesy and Patriot28, accusing them of overvaluing their investment fund and misrepresenting data to attract investors.

    An administrative law judge within the SEC ruled that Jarkesy and Patriot28 had committed securities fraud, as did the SEC’s internal commission.


    https://thehill.com/regulation/court...onstitutional/

    maybe the republic is restored?
    The republic won't be restored until Joe & the Ho are out of office, and may take years beyond that.
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RB 60 For This Post:

    ExpressLane (05-20-2022), Matt Dillon (05-21-2022)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,347
    Thanks
    6,677
    Thanked 12,316 Times in 9,824 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    The republic won't be restored until Joe & the Ho are out of office, and may take years beyond that.
    so what are the market implications of the SEC being defanged?

    i think it will only hasten the collapse.

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,200
    Thanks
    9,669
    Thanked 22,599 Times in 17,043 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    so what are the market implications of the SEC being defanged?

    i think it will only hasten the collapse.
    I try to remain optimistic. We weren't the greatest nation on earth for over 200 years to collapse in just a few years.
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to RB 60 For This Post:

    ExpressLane (05-20-2022)

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,347
    Thanks
    6,677
    Thanked 12,316 Times in 9,824 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    I try to remain optimistic. We weren't the greatest nation on earth for over 200 years to collapse in just a few years.
    yeah.....optimism!

    so will corporations be insider trading and lying about everything now!

    woot woot.......



    Y'all should sell now.

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,200
    Thanks
    9,669
    Thanked 22,599 Times in 17,043 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    yeah.....optimism!

    so will corporations be insider trading and lying about everything now!

    woot woot.......



    Y'all should sell now.
    I should have sold 2 months ago.
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to RB 60 For This Post:

    Blackwater Lunchbreak (05-21-2022)

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,347
    Thanks
    6,677
    Thanked 12,316 Times in 9,824 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    I should have sold 2 months ago.
    doh

  12. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,200
    Thanks
    9,669
    Thanked 22,599 Times in 17,043 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    doh
    Oh well, I guess I have to ride it out until a legitimate president is elected again and the country regains some self confidence
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  13. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    32,857
    Thanks
    19,749
    Thanked 9,460 Times in 7,746 Posts
    Groans
    836
    Groaned 510 Times in 503 Posts

    Default

    Idk, adding more government doesn't sound like such a good idea. Besides, the SEC is pretty much a Bureau, no?

    The SEC's task is to deal with securities fraud, by adding another layer, it will only slow them down.

    In the OP, the judge ruled FOR some guys that committed securities fraud and then sued the SEC.

    I don't see that as a good thing.
    Last edited by Matt Dillon; 05-21-2022 at 07:25 AM.

  14. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,347
    Thanks
    6,677
    Thanked 12,316 Times in 9,824 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    Oh well, I guess I have to ride it out until a legitimate president is elected again and the country regains some self confidence
    how low can we go?

    it's limbo time!

  15. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,347
    Thanks
    6,677
    Thanked 12,316 Times in 9,824 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Dillon View Post
    Idk, adding more government doesn't sound like such a good idea. Besides, the SEC is pretty much a Bureau, no?

    The SEC's task is to deal with securities fraud, by adding another layer, it will only slow them down.
    but there does need to be policing of what the big guys are doing, that is if they want the money of main street to be invested in their schemes.

    as you know, im no libertarian.

  16. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,347
    Thanks
    6,677
    Thanked 12,316 Times in 9,824 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    its disturbing to me this story didn't get any coverage anywhere.

    I didn't even hear of it.

  17. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,347
    Thanks
    6,677
    Thanked 12,316 Times in 9,824 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    maybe this is what happens when the press starts asking congress people about their trades.

  18. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,347
    Thanks
    6,677
    Thanked 12,316 Times in 9,824 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    yes. the more i think about it...this is highly disturbing and the end of the line for non-oligarchs.

  19. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    32,857
    Thanks
    19,749
    Thanked 9,460 Times in 7,746 Posts
    Groans
    836
    Groaned 510 Times in 503 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    maybe this is what happens when the press starts asking congress people about their trades.
    Congress voted themselves immune from prosecution in the Reagan years.

    Between the time of Carter and Reagan, Congress voted to elevate themselves to the Lords of the United States.

    It will take a Convention of the States to fix that.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Matt Dillon For This Post:

    Blackwater Lunchbreak (05-21-2022)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-31-2022, 06:29 PM
  2. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-07-2021, 04:30 PM
  3. va judges rules ballots illegal
    By Blackwater Lunchbreak in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-31-2021, 01:25 PM
  4. U.S. federal judge rules Obamacare unconstitutional
    By ziggy in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-15-2018, 01:55 AM
  5. Court rules Wisconsin right-to-work law is unconstitutional
    By Konono in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 04-09-2016, 10:29 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •