Originally Posted by
anatta
some of the Emails cant be introduced but Sussman charges clearly have a political motive to them.
And yes there are no conspiracy charges here
But Sussmans motive was to mislead the FBI regarding Trumps ( never happened) activities
tied to Russia
Wow. you don't have a clue what this case is about. Sussmann was not misleading the FBI about Trump's activities. In fact, Durham is not saying the information the Sussmann brought was wrong. He can't say that without lying to the court.
"Hating" (word used in the report)Trump is clearly biased towards overlooking Sussman's guilt
and letting him off due to overwhelming prejudice against the target of his misrepresentation to the FBI
The juror was asked and they said they could be impartial in deciding the case since the case is not about Trump.
Clearly if Durham had presumptive strikes against sitting any juror these 2 would be unfit to serve
(in his POV)
Perhaps Durham had to use strikes on other more grievous bias?
Or maybe Durham doesnt get those.. this I dont know
According to news reports, the judge told DeFillipis he could use his preemptive strike to get rid of that juror but he didn't. So no one to blame but Durham's team if you don't like the jury.
I do know the jury pool is tainted and expect no convictions - my opinion
So the fact that someone that has donated to the Cato Institute is on the jury is evidence of a tainted jury?
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
Bookmarks