Reply With Quotenot all women ignorant dumbass, as a matter of fact women as a group was not mentioned at all, learn to readOriginally Posted by christiefan915
Retired Teacher
How many abortions are after 6 weeks?
Senior Member
not all women ignorant dumbass, as a matter of fact women as a group was not mentioned at all, learn to read
Doc Dutch finally admits he is a steaming pile of chickenshit!
Insane Level of Addiction
Nine out of 10 abortions done before 12 weeks in many high ...
https://www.bmj.com › Home › Newsroom
Generally, most abortions were carried out by 10 or 11 weeks, and in most countries nearly all abortions (90%) were obtained before 13 weeks, with the highest .
TOP (05-05-2022)
Verified User
UGH...the decision was based on Constitutional Law...there was no "Roe" Law.
What the fuck are you talking about?They interpreted the Constitution to include abortion under the right to privacy changing the meaning of the Constitution to expand the right to privacy.
The Constitution was not amended or changed at all to include abortion in the right to privacy.
So you're not talking about a law, you're talking about a precedent that is based in Constitutional Law.
An abortion law would need to come from Congress, not SCOTUS.
Jesus fucking Christ.
SO STUPID.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Pocket lint
JPP Contributor
Agreed. Shooting angry Trumpers should be a national pastime.
Earl (05-05-2022)
Verified User
NO, it isn't.
The system has never, until the Roberts Court, worked in this context where the personal beliefs of the justices form as the basis of their decisions.
You would need to prove that the justices decided those along their personal beliefs and not along the letter of the law, which you're not going to be able to do because none of those justices lied during their confirmation hearings.Does that mean Brown, Loving, Lawrence, and Obergefell should not have overturned previous law just because of 5 or 6 justices personal beliefs?
(Some Critical Race Theory for you: confirmation hearings for SCOTUS justices weren't a thing until the first Jewish justice was nominated)
Why don't you get off your lazy ass and read those decisions so you can see clearly the contrast between a thoughtful, legal interpretation of the law and a thoughtless, personal interpretation?
No they don't.All the justices perjure themselves during confirmation hearings.
You mean to tell me that in all their law experience, none of the SCOTUS justices had ever taken the bar or went to law school?They have no real choice if they want to be confirmed because of the excessively partisan questioning by Democrats and Republicans trying to get them to commit themselves to issues on cases they have not heard.
What do they all mean by "precedent", then? When they talk about precedent during their confirmation hearings, what are they talking about if not for this?
Again, you're really fucking stupid.
Just really, really dumb.
But they did make a broad ruling on Roe, despite saying it was settled.In many cases justices just rule on the MS case without making the broader ruling on Roe.
Can you point to any confirmation hearing in the last 100 or so years where the justice said that something was precedent and then completely flip-flopped? Because I can't recall that ever happening.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Verified User
Who said I wanted to murder little kitties?
I love cats more than people.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Verified User
Yep...exactly.
You now have no legal right to privacy, which means I can doxx you if I wanted.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Verified User
like (after) Roe the law varies by state
But i take that as a serious threat from a psychopath as yoursself
I don't know how you were diverted / You were perverted too
I don't know how you were inverted / No one alerted you
Earl (05-05-2022)
Insane Level of Addiction
I just ran across this. they should make a political ad with it. Democrat/liberals/leftist/progressives/Democommies have always been TWO FACED HYPOCRITES. They only get away with it because they have the left-wing medias in their back pockets. How anyone can vote for such a slimy party is astounding to me.
snip;
Flip-Floppin’ Joe Biden Once Voted to Overturn Roe v. Wade
President Joe Biden opposed the Supreme Court’s decision to legalize abortion one year after Roe v Wade.
“I don’t think that a woman has the sole right to say what should happen to her body,” he told the Washingtonian in 1974, one year after the court legalized abortion.
“I don’t like the Supreme Court decision on abortion. I think it went too far,” he added.
All of it with comments:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...rn-roe-v-wade/
Verified User
You should.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Insane Level of Addiction
Indeed!
Nothing more effective in energizing the Democrat Socialist base than baby killing.
Insane Level of Addiction
LV is an industrial strength coward.
Quote Originally Posted by LV426 View Post
“It happened all over PM, Earl. We set a time, then he PM'd me to say he wasn't going to show up. Since then, I've ignored him because he and I both know that he was the one who didn't follow through.“
If this is true, you are releasing PM information which is a violation of the TOS of JPP.
So, you are either a liar or in violation of the TOS of JPP., cobarde. Checkmate.
Where did the little twerp, AKA el cobarde, go?
Second flinch...a double flincher.
CFM posted:
Clearly a lie since the directions were provided over open forum.
His claim was that he had expert investigative abilities and all he needed was a few things he could get by seeing me in order to doxx me. Directions were given. Since he's failed to do what he claimed he'd do, he's the one that didn't follow through. He's welcome to use those directions any time. Doubt he'll follow through at all.
CFM posted:
I asked him to explain how providing him with detailed directions to where I am is cowardly. I'm yet to get an answer. Not long after they were provided, he put me on ignore.
Verified User
How is that misleading? The issue will return to the states to decide just like before Roe. What was deceptive about the story that said exactly that?
In my state the law would: make abortion a felony with exceptions "only to save the life of the pregnant patient or if they risk “substantial impairment of major bodily function.” Doctors could face life in prison and fines up to $100,000 if they perform abortions in violation of the law"
Verified User
We all know that. Supreme Court decisions interpreting the Constitution become constitutional law (not statutory law).
You are arguing something we know already and nobody suggested anything to the contrary.
We have long established your lack of knowledge about constitutional issues.
If you do not think the Constitution was changed (through court interpretation) you have not read Roe. It used the right to privacy created by Griswold to make abortion protected by that same right to privacy. Roe became constitutional law when it issued that decision. It did not become "a law" but became part of the Constitution through court interpretation which is the "law of the land"--you know, the "settled law" they all talked about.
"Settled law" can be changed. At one time Plessy (1896) was settled law until it was overturned in 1954. Nobody passed a law to overturn Plessy; instread, the court changed it through constitutional interpretation which is known as constitutional law.
The precedent they used to make that decision was Griswold, Society of Sisters, etc. Precedent can be used to make new constitutional law.
dukkha (05-05-2022)
Posting Rules
Bookmarks