Trump files Federal Lawsuit against Hillary, & Other Dems, OVER RUSSIA LIE.

[Guno צְבִי]

Donald Trump: Three decades
4,095 lawsuits


https://www.azcentral.com/pages/inte...rump-lawsuits/

[Nordberg]

Trump required some attention. He has been out of the news. His new "news" site is burning and the court cases are reaching fruition. I suppose he senses how much legal trouble he is in, so it is deflection time.

[Nordberg]

THE TRUMP DISCOVERY ALREADY HAPPENED; IT WAS CALLED THE MEULLER PROBE. FOUND NOTHING.


NOW IT'S TIME FOR THE HILLARY/SEDTIONIST DEMS DISCOVERY.

Take the time to read it, then you would hopefully not type anything so wrong and stupid.

[archives]

Trump required some attention. He has been out of the news. His new "news" site is burning and the court cases are reaching fruition. I suppose he senses how much legal trouble he is in, so it is deflection time.

Exactly, Donnie can't stand not being the story of the day, so he files another frivolous lawsuit so MAGA men like "copy and paste" get all excited thinking it actually means something

Trump has filed over 1900 lawsuits and counting, he has won only 210, it is what Trump does, either for attention, as we see here, or as countersuits to publicly deflect off of charges against him.

Irony is that as someone above pointed out, if there ever were a trial, which there won't be, all the evidence against him would only recycle the facts Barr reframed in his defense

[Grokmaster]

Take the time to read it, then you would hopefully not type anything so wrong and stupid.

NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION, DIPSHIT. READ IT YOURSELF.


MEANWHILE, THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT THE PEOPLE HE IS SUING FOR PROPAGATING THE RUSSIA LIES, DID EXECTLY WHAT HE CLAIMS THEY DID.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION, DIPSHIT. READ IT YOURSELF.


MEANWHILE, THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT THE PEOPLE HE IS SUING FOR PROPAGATING THE RUSSIA LIES, DID EXECTLY WHAT HE CLAIMS THEY DID.

ROFLMAO. You clearly haven't read it.

U.S. Department of Justice
Attorney Work Product // May Contain Material Protected Under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts, the investigation did not
establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian
government in its election interference activities.
* * *
Below we describe the evidentiary considerations underpinning statements about the
results of our investigation and the Special Counsel’s charging decisions, and we then provide an
overview of the two volumes of our report.
The report describes actions and events that the Special Counsel’s Office found to be
supported by the evidence collected in our investigation. In some instances, the report points out
the absence of evidence or conflicts in the evidence about a particular fact or event. In other
instances, when substantial, credible evidence enabled the Office to reach a conclusion with
confidence, the report states that the investigation established that certain actions or events
occurred. A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there
was no evidence of those facts.

In evaluating whether evidence about collective action of multiple individuals constituted
a crime, we applied the framework of conspiracy law, not the concept of “collusion.”

So to claim they found no Russian conclusion is to completely ignore what they wrote. The didn't evaluate any evidence to see if there was collusion since collusion isn't a crime.

They did find multiple contacts between Russia and the Trump campaign.

The Office identified multiple contacts—“links,” in the words of the Appointment Order—
between Trump Campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government. The
Office investigated whether those contacts constituted a third avenue of attempted Russian
interference with or influence on the 2016 presidential election. In particular, the investigation
examined whether these contacts involved or resulted in coordination or a conspiracy with the
Trump Campaign and Russia, including with respect to Russia providing assistance to the
Campaign in exchange for any sort of favorable treatment in the future. Based on the available
information, the investigation did not establish such coordination.

They couldn't establish any evidence of coordination but the report says nothing about there being no collusion.
But while they couldn't establish coordination, that doesn't mean there was no evidence of coordination based on their earlier statement.

[martin]

Well, well, well; there is no way Mr.Trump can possibly lose this lawsuit ,as there are thousands of hours of video, thousands of documents, and an ONGOING FEDERAL SPECIAL COUNSEL PROBE PROVING IT AS WELL.


IMAGINE ALL THAT WILL BE EXPOSED IN DISCOVERY!!

CANNOT WAIT TO SEE WHERE THIS GOES.

It will go straight into the ash can. If political candidates and their campaigns could be sued for the false charges made against opposing candidates we wouldn't have any more elections. This charge isn't even entirely false if it's false at all. Mueller found that Russia did insert itself into the campaign. Mueller made no finding that Trump and his campaign were involved but neither did he find that they were not involved. Nor is Mueller's report proof of anything.

[anatta]

"Acting in concert, the Defendants maliciously conspired to weave a false narrative that their Republican opponent, Donald J. Trump, was colluding with a hostile foreign sovereignty," the former president alleged in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Florida.

completely true, but no one is ever held accountable - doubt if anything comes of it

[ExpressLane]

It will go straight into the ash can. If political candidates and their campaigns could be sued for the false charges made against opposing candidates we wouldn't have any more elections. This charge isn't even entirely false if it's false at all. Mueller found that Russia did insert itself into the campaign. Mueller made no finding that Trump and his campaign were involved but neither did he find that they were not involved. Nor is Mueller's report proof of anything.

Trump is going to win this case just like he won the case against Stormy Daniels. Hillary will pay through the nose.

[anatta]

It will go straight into the ash can. If political candidates and their campaigns could be sued for the false charges made against opposing candidates we wouldn't have any more elections. This charge isn't even entirely false if it's false at all. Mueller found that Russia did insert itself into the campaign. Mueller made no finding that Trump and his campaign were involved but neither did he find that they were not involved. Nor is Mueller's report proof of anything.

no collusion per specialcounsel

[anatta]

ROFLMAO. You clearly haven't read it.



So to claim they found no Russian conclusion is to completely ignore what they wrote. The didn't evaluate any evidence to see if there was collusion since collusion isn't a crime.

They did find multiple contacts between Russia and the Trump campaign.

They couldn't establish any evidence of coordination but the report says nothing about there being no collusion.
But while they couldn't establish coordination, that doesn't mean there was no evidence of coordination based on their earlier statement.

first you argue they cant find collusion because collusion isn't a crime
(conspiracy is what they actually looked for) then this gibberish

They couldn't establish any evidence of coordination but the report says nothing about there being no collusion.

[ExpressLane]

no collusion per specialcounsel

They are still clinging to the Collusion Big Lie. Its all they have. Sad really.

[Son of the Revolution]

Hildacunt is going down, and I don't mean on obama again

[Poor Richard Saunders]

no collusion per specialcounsel

Really? Where in the report does it say that?

[ExpressLane]

Really? Where in the report does it say that?

You show us where the report shows collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Dimwit.