Trump files Federal Lawsuit against Hillary, & Other Dems, OVER RUSSIA LIE.

[Jarod]

Are you pretending it made it to discovery? 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss - GRANTED!

But hey, it was a good trick to get idiot Trumppers to send him more money!

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

Are you pretending it made it to discovery? 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss - GRANTED!

But hey, it was a good trick to get idiot Trumppers to send him more money!

[Jarod]

Poor ASS HAT! Your Golden Calf has been proven not to be a God, once again.

[Grokmaster]

Poor ASS HAT! Your Golden Calf has been proven not to be a God, once again.

OF COURSE A CLINTON-APPOINTED JUDGE WAS SOUGHT OUT AND PAID APPROPRIATELY.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

ONCE AGAIN...THE INDISPUTABLE TRUTH, OF THE PRIMARY POINT OF THE LAWSUIT:



THE ORIGIN OF THE RUSSIA LIE, IS NOT IN QUESTION; THAT DAMAGE WAS DONE TO TRUMP BECAUSE OF IT, IS NOT IN QUESTION.


THOSE RESPONSIBLE ARE WELL KNOWN TO EVERYONE FOR IT...AND PROBABLY SOME MORE WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT....YET. WE WILL.


ALL THAT MATTERS. PERIOD.



HILARIOUS THAT YOU CANNOT GET YOUR HEAD AROUND THAT UNAVOIDABLE, IRREFUTABLE REALITY.



SO, WHILE YOU FROTH OVER MINUTIAE , THE PRIMARY TRUTHS OF THE SUIT, REMAIN UNCHANGED.


THE RUSSIA LIE CONSPIRATORS WILL NOT ESCAPE ON SOME SILLY UNDOTTED "I" or UNCROSSED "T" [/B]

It looks like my prediction came true.
I predict half of the defendants will be gone in 6 months from the suit and the suit will be dropped by Trump or he will lose in court within 16 months. How much you willing to bet or are you going to continue to mouth off without being willing to actually put up anything other than your idiotic opinions?

And your predictions failed miserable.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

OF COURSE A CLINTON-APPOINTED JUDGE WAS SOUGHT OUT AND PAID APPROPRIATELY.

Does time work differently for Trumpers? There is a 4 year statute of limitations on RICO cases. The suit by Trump alleges the crimes occurred in 2016, which means the case needed to be filed before the end of 2020. It wasn't.

The RICO statute requires that at least 2 crimes occur that meet the requirements. The judge points out that Trump couldn't even point to one crime under RICO.

This is not the case of a judge being bought off. This is the case of a judge applying the actual law and seeing that Trump has not brought any evidence at all that meets the legal requirements.

The ruling is here....
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...ump-v-clinton/
Feel free to point out where the judge actually made an error.

[Grokmaster]

Does time work differently for Trumpers? There is a 4 year statute of limitations on RICO cases. The suit by Trump alleges the crimes occurred in 2016, which means the case needed to be filed before the end of 2020. It wasn't.

The RICO statute requires that at least 2 crimes occur that meet the requirements. The judge points out that Trump couldn't even point to one crime under RICO.

This is not the case of a judge being bought off. This is the case of a judge applying the actual law and seeing that Trump has not brought any evidence at all that meets the legal requirements.

The ruling is here....
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...ump-v-clinton/
Feel free to point out where the judge actually made an error.

HORSE SHIT. IT'S A CASE OF A JUDGE APPOINTED BY HER HUSBAND, AND A GLARING CONFLICT OF INTEREST....

[Poor Richard Saunders]

HORSE SHIT. IT'S A CASE OF A JUDGE APPOINTED BY HER HUSBAND, AND A GLARING CONFLICT OF INTEREST....

ROFLMAO.. So are you willing to argue that Judge Aileen Cannon has a glaring conflict of interest? Are you willing to argue that every judge Trump appointed has a glaring conflict of interest?

My guess is you are full of that horse shit since you weren't able to point out a single part of the ruling where you think the judge made an error.

[Jarod]

OF COURSE A CLINTON-APPOINTED JUDGE WAS SOUGHT OUT AND PAID APPROPRIATELY.

Appointed by Regan.

[Jarod]

HORSE SHIT. IT'S A CASE OF A JUDGE APPOINTED BY HER HUSBAND, AND A GLARING CONFLICT OF INTEREST....

What president was she married to?

[Grokmaster]

Does time work differently for Trumpers? There is a 4 year statute of limitations on RICO cases. The suit by Trump alleges the crimes occurred in 2016, which means the case needed to be filed before the end of 2020. It wasn't.

The RICO statute requires that at least 2 crimes occur that meet the requirements. The judge points out that Trump couldn't even point to one crime under RICO.

This is not the case of a judge being bought off. This is the case of a judge applying the actual law and seeing that Trump has not brought any evidence at all that meets the legal requirements.

The ruling is here....
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...ump-v-clinton/
Feel free to point out where the judge actually made an error.

IRRELEVANT TO THE FACT THAT IT WAS DISMISSED BY A JUDGE SEATED BY HER HUSBAND... A GLARING CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

[Grokmaster]

What president was she married to?

HILLARY'S HUSBAND YOU CHILDISH MORON.

[Poor Richard Saunders]

IRRELEVANT TO THE FACT THAT IT WAS DISMISSED BY A JUDGE SEATED BY HER HUSBAND... A GLARING CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

So, it is a glaring conflict of interest for Aileen Cannon to rule on anything related to Trump?

You still haven't pointed to where Judge Middlebrooks made an error. Is there a 4 year statute of limitations or not? Is this 2022 and the alleged RICO act occured in 2016? Is it 6 years from 2016 to 2022? Is 6 years greater than 4 years?

[Grokmaster]

So, it is a glaring conflict of interest for Aileen Cannon to rule on anything related to Trump?

You still haven't pointed to where Judge Middlebrooks made an error. Is there a 4 year statute of limitations or not? Is this 2022 and the alleged RICO act occured in 2016? Is it 6 years from 2016 to 2022? Is 6 years greater than 4 years?

The Special Master she appointed is CLEARLY UNBIASED....try again.

[Doc Dutch]

The Special Master she appointed is CLEARLY UNBIASED....try again.

Team Crazy picked the Special Master, dumbass.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...into-headache/
Trump’s special master pick turns into a headache
A push by Donald Trump’s lawyers to appoint a special master in the Mar-a-Lago documents case has quickly lost its main utility, with an appeals court restoring the Justice Department’s access to the documents with classified markings.

Halting the Justice Department’s review of those documents — and by extension slowing its criminal probe of Trump — appeared to be its essential aim. In the end, it bought about two weeks’ worth of delay.

But special master Raymond J. Dearie is still here, as he presses forward with a less-consequential review of all of the other documents. And now Trump’s lawyers are contending with a series of very public and potentially embarrassing exchanges prompted by the special master they themselves recommended for the post.

First, Dearie did something that Trump-nominated U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon, for some reason, hadn’t: actually pressing Trump’s legal team on its suggestions that Trump might have declassified the documents. That’s now irrelevant to Dearie’s review, with those documents no longer under his purview. But their failure to provide any real evidence that declassification took place (or to echo Trump’s public assurances that he had declassified all of the documents) was rebuked first by Dearie and then, shortly thereafter, by the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.