Jackson, Biden's Supreme Court pick, refuses to define the word 'woman'

[dukkha]

"Do you interpret Justice Ginsburg's meaning of men and women as male and female?" Blackburn pressed. Jackson did not comment on the matter.

"Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman?’" the senator asked.

"Can I provide a definition? No," Jackson responded. "I can't."

"You can't?" Blackburn asked.

"Not in this context, I'm not a biologist," the judge replied.

"Do you believe the meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can't give me a definition?" Blackburn pressed.

"Senator, in my work as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. If there's a dispute about a definition, people make arguments, and I look at the law, and I decide," Jackson said.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ket...the-word-woman

[dukkha]

our best legal minds..lol

She's a big fan of CRT as well.

[dukkha]

Just last week, an entire generation of young girls watched as our taxpayer-funded institutions permitted a biological man to compete [against] and beat a biological woman in the NCAA women's swimming championships," the senator added, referring to the controversial case of transgender swimmer Lia Thomas.

"What message do you think this sends to girls?"

"Senator, I'm not sure what message that sends. If you're asking me about the legal issues related to it, those are topics that are being hotly discussed, as you say, and could come to the Court, so I'm not able to" address them, the judge responded.

[Lionfish]

[ThatOwlWoman]

Poor Incels. So unsure of what a woman really is that they need a Supreme Court nominee and Harvard graduate to explain it to them.

[Son of the Revolution]

Poor Incels. So unsure of what a woman really is that they need a Supreme Court nominee and Harvard graduate to explain it to them.

they bitch couldn't define the meaning of "woman"

[AProudLefty]

"Do you interpret Justice Ginsburg's meaning of men and women as male and female?" Blackburn pressed. Jackson did not comment on the matter.

"Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman?’" the senator asked.

"Can I provide a definition? No," Jackson responded. "I can't."

"You can't?" Blackburn asked.

"Not in this context, I'm not a biologist," the judge replied.

"Do you believe the meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can't give me a definition?" Blackburn pressed.

"Senator, in my work as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. If there's a dispute about a definition, people make arguments, and I look at the law, and I decide," Jackson said.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ket...the-word-woman

Why is the definition of "men" and "female" so important for the SCOTUS?

[AProudLefty]

Just last week, an entire generation of young girls watched as our taxpayer-funded institutions permitted a biological man to compete [against] and beat a biological woman in the NCAA women's swimming championships," the senator added, referring to the controversial case of transgender swimmer Lia Thomas.

"What message do you think this sends to girls?"

"Senator, I'm not sure what message that sends. If you're asking me about the legal issues related to it, those are topics that are being hotly discussed, as you say, and could come to the Court, so I'm not able to" address them, the judge responded.

So? Like she said, it could come to the court. Until then, the question is pointless. It's a bait and THEY KNOW IT.

[AProudLefty]

She's a big fan of CRT as well.

She doesn't even know what it is so how can she be a big fan of it?

[Legion]

[dukkha]

Poor Incels. So unsure of what a woman really is that they need a Supreme Court nominee and Harvard graduate to explain it to them.

she needs to define WTF is a woman - not "explain"anything
Pretty basic stuff for a SCOTUS nominee unable to answer

[Wolverine]

She can't because she would upset the freaks! Ba ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

​”And can you provide a definition for the word ​’woman’?” Blackburn continued.​


After a short back-and-forth, Jackson ultimately said: “No, I can’t.”​

https://nypost.com/2022/03/23/sen-bl...tion-of-woman/

[AProudLefty]

she needs to define WTF is a woman - not "explain"anything
Pretty basic stuff for a SCOTUS nominee unable to answer

Again why is it necessary for her to define "woman"?

[BidenPresident]

"Do you interpret Justice Ginsburg's meaning of men and women as male and female?" Blackburn pressed. Jackson did not comment on the matter.

"Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman?’" the senator asked.

"Can I provide a definition? No," Jackson responded. "I can't."

"You can't?" Blackburn asked.

"Not in this context, I'm not a biologist," the judge replied.

"Do you believe the meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can't give me a definition?" Blackburn pressed.

"Senator, in my work as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. If there's a dispute about a definition, people make arguments, and I look at the law, and I decide," Jackson said.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ket...the-word-woman

Even worse, she's Black!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[dukkha]

She doesn't even know what it is so how can she be a big fan of it?

^ cant fix stupid

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/pre...-crt-advocates
In speeches and writings, Judge Jackson has frequently cited leading advocates and ideas of Critical Race Theory (CRT).

Judge Jackson praised the late Derrick Bell, better known as the godfather of CRT, and his wife Janet Bell

She referred to his 1993 book, “Faces At The Bottom Of The Well: The Permanence Of Racism” as “essential reading” and “a pioneering contribution to critical race theory scholarship”
Judge Jackson claimed she has “drawn heavily” from leading CRT advocate Janet Bell

In a lecture, Judge Jackson highlighted the 1619 Project, which was repurposed into materials for K-12 students – originally claiming that the “true founding” of the U.S. began when the first slave ship arrived in the U.S.

Judge Jackson has revealed that she finds critical race theory to be an important component of sentencing

In a lecture, Judge Jackson revealed that she found sentencing “interesting on an intellectual level, in part because it melds together myriad types of law” including “constitutional law, critical race theory” and others