California legislature moves to destroy the rental market

[Jack]

It can get damn close to it and California is headed there.

According to Poli, California needs*MORE PEOPLE to solve the Problem.

[Jack]

Well, they mostly move to NV, AZ, TX, CO, and FL. Washington mostly appeals to people from Northern California (like my mom. My wife kinda hates it here).

I have a friend in Seattle that says they hate all the Californians that are moving there.

[Minister of Truth]

I have a friend in Seattle that says they hate all the Californians that are moving there.

That has been a thing since the late 70s. We all identify as "West Coast," while WA and OR simultaneously hate CA. When my mom moved up here in 1980, people would start to get agitated when she said she was from California. Then, when they realized she was from Crescent City, they stopped hating her.

[McRocket]

Arson anyone?

[Hawkeye10]

Arson anyone?

Are the Chinese already in charge?

[Hawkeye10]

I have a friend in Seattle that says they hate all the Californians that are moving there.

As if Seattle is fine......

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

The California state legislature is poised to pass AB 854. This bill would impose a five-year minimum requirement on any landlord to remain in business and renting to tenants no matter how much money they might lose doing so. Owners of rental properties would have to have been in business for at least five years at the property in question before they could begin to evict tenants.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/tw...edgdhp&pc=U531

If there was a reason to bail on rental properties, this is it. What California is going to see is a massive shortage of rental properties and those that remain being ones owned by large corporations that can navigate the byzantine labyrinth of regulations and laws California is imposing on landlords. It means renters are going to get screwed while the landlords can trample the state in court having better lawyers and the money to fight the state.

holy fucking fuck.

[Legion]

The California state legislature is poised to pass AB 854. This bill would impose a five-year minimum requirement on any landlord to remain in business and renting to tenants no matter how much money they might lose doing so. Owners of rental properties would have to have been in business for at least five years at the property in question before they could begin to evict tenants.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/tw...edgdhp&pc=U531

If there was a reason to bail on rental properties, this is it. What California is going to see is a massive shortage of rental properties and those that remain being ones owned by large corporations that can navigate the byzantine labyrinth of regulations and laws California is imposing on landlords. It means renters are going to get screwed while the landlords can trample the state in court having better lawyers and the money to fight the state.

Don't Nasty Nancy Pelosi and her pet man Paul own a large corporation that can navigate the byzantine labyrinth of regulations and laws California is imposing on landlords?

Financial Leasing Services, Inc?

[T. A. Gardner]

Don't Nasty Nancy Pelosi and her pet man Paul own a large corporation that can navigate the byzantine labyrinth of regulations and laws California is imposing on landlords?

Financial Leasing Services, Inc?

Probably. After she retires from fucking the public at large she can become a feudal lady and fuck over her serfs in the section 8 housing she rules.

[Legion]

Probably. After she retires from fucking the public at large she can become a feudal lady and fuck over her serfs in the section 8 housing she rules.

Financial Leasing Services, Inc. has been the Pelosi's cash cow since 1973.



They specialize in picking off smaller property owners devastated by restrictive legislation.

https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.financial_leasing_services_inc.ef08dda116 27e947fb111f0cd87de5f5.html

https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Pelosi-s-husband-prefers-a-low-profile-2660253.php

[Doc Dutch]

The California state legislature is poised to pass AB 854. This bill would impose a five-year minimum requirement on any landlord to remain in business and renting to tenants no matter how much money they might lose doing so. Owners of rental properties would have to have been in business for at least five years at the property in question before they could begin to evict tenants.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/tw...edgdhp&pc=U531

If there was a reason to bail on rental properties, this is it. What California is going to see is a massive shortage of rental properties and those that remain being ones owned by large corporations that can navigate the byzantine labyrinth of regulations and laws California is imposing on landlords. It means renters are going to get screwed while the landlords can trample the state in court having better lawyers and the money to fight the state.

"Laboratories of Democracy". While I still support State's Rights, it's both interesting and troubling to see how many Trumpers are now like Democrats and against State's Rights. Sad.

Fuck California and anyone who chooses to live there. There's a reason why I was happy to leave that fucking state in 1985 and have zero desire to move back.

[PostmodernProphet]

I'm sure a majority of people will realize this is not good, even if they ARE from California......

[Legion]

Trump

.

[Doc Dutch]

Arson anyone?

Not that you'd do it, McRicket. You strike me as a chickenshit living in his basement.

Have you ever committed a crime? Done anything dangerous? Risked your life for someone else or simply to have fun?

[PostmodernProphet]

"Laboratories of Democracy". While I still support State's Rights, it's both interesting and troubling to see how many Trumpers are now like Democrats and against State's Rights.

no one said California didn't have the right to be stupid.......they just said they were stupid.....