Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: The Willful Naïveté of Stephen Breyer

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,737
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default The Willful Naïveté of Stephen Breyer

    Indeed, even after the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, had muscled three nominees onto the court — trashing the norms of the appointments process and tipping the court’s balance decisively to the right — there was Justice Breyer, maintaining that his new colleagues had checked their politics at the door. “Once appointed,” he argued in a book published in September, “a judge naturally decides a case in the way that he or she believes the law demands. It is a judge’s sworn duty to be impartial, and all of us take that oath seriously.”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/27/o...eme-court.html

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,737
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Breyer is making the case we could use an AI program and eliminate the Supreme Court.

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    30,037
    Thanks
    2,791
    Thanked 10,993 Times in 8,363 Posts
    Groans
    41
    Groaned 595 Times in 591 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    Indeed, even after the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, had muscled three nominees onto the court — trashing the norms of the appointments process and tipping the court’s balance decisively to the right — there was Justice Breyer, maintaining that his new colleagues had checked their politics at the door. “Once appointed,” he argued in a book published in September, “a judge naturally decides a case in the way that he or she believes the law demands. It is a judge’s sworn duty to be impartial, and all of us take that oath seriously.”

    https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/27/o...eme-court.html
    Oh well

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,737
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default Who has more influence on supreme court: Clarence Thomas or his activist wife?

    SFFA’s lawsuit seeking to strike down affirmative action has received the enthusiastic backing of the conservative National Association of Scholars. It filed an amicus brief in support of the suit, accusing Harvard admissions officials of being prejudiced against Asian students and stereotyping them as “uninteresting, uncreative and one-dimensional”.

    Ginni Thomas sits on the advisory board of the National Association of Scholars. Observers are concerned that her position with a group that has intervened in the affirmative action case could present appearances of conflict of interest.

    https://www.theguardian.com/law/2022...e-ginni-thomas

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 39
    Last Post: 01-28-2022, 05:41 PM
  2. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-26-2022, 12:04 PM
  3. Stephen Breyer just made Democrats' Friday
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-27-2021, 02:16 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-30-2021, 11:07 AM
  5. The High Price of American Naiveté
    By Truth Detector in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-21-2020, 10:38 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •