Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: TRUMP’S JAN 6 COVER-UP IS UNRAVELING FASTER THAN YOU CAN SAY “YOU’RE SCREWED, DONNY"

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    16,111
    Thanks
    6,966
    Thanked 9,364 Times in 6,036 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 602 Times in 566 Posts

    Default TRUMP’S JAN 6 COVER-UP IS UNRAVELING FASTER THAN YOU CAN SAY “YOU’RE SCREWED, DONNY"

    The Supreme Court’s ruling against him is a huge, huge blow.
    https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022...ry-6-committee

    One of the most frustrating aspects of the January 6 committee’s attempt to find out exactly what Donald Trump was doing before, during, and after the the attack on the U.S. Capitol is the ex-president’s use of the court system to delay, delay, delay, and delay some more. In fact, at one point over the last few months, it actually felt like congressional investigators might never get their hands on the information they need to piece together what Trump was up to on that awful day, because his lawyers would just file appeals over and over and over again. But on Wednesday, all that changed when the Supreme Court near unanimously informed Trump’s legal team that its effort to cover up its client’s actions is over.

    The devastating blow, in which every justice but Clarence Thomas agreed the presidential documents sought by the January 6 committee must be handed over, will give investigators an unfettered look at Trump’s activities surrounding the failed coup. As the Associated Press notes, there isn’t a single legal action Trump can take to stop the transmission of the documents, which has got to hurt. The information, which the panel has already reportedly begun to receive, includes visitor logs, presidential diaries, speech drafts, and handwritten notes. In addition to being a huge blow to his attempt to hide the role he played in the insurrection, the decision from the Supreme Court has no doubt made Trump extra apoplectic, given that he personally installed three justices—including one in the midst of the pandemic, less than two months before the election—in the hopes of having some friendly faces on the bench.

    In a statement that can only be described as the congressional equivalent of fighting words, the January 6 committee tweeted Wednesday: “The Supreme Court’s action tonight is a victory for the rule of law & American democracy. The Select Committee has already begun to receive records that the former President had hoped to keep hidden & we look forward to additional productions regarding this important information.” Committee member Zoe Lofgren told CNN’s Erin Burnett that the court ruling is a “very big deal for getting the truth out,” adding: “We are going to get these documents and we are going to go through them and help piece this picture together.”

    One thing said documents might help investigators out with? The “secret” meetings Trump apparently took in the lead-up to the insurrection. Per The Guardian:

    The former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham told the House select committee investigating the Capitol attack that Donald Trump hosted secret meetings in the White House residence in days before 6 January, according to two sources familiar with the matter. The former senior Trump aide also told House investigators that the details of whether Trump actually intended to march to the Capitol after his speech at the Ellipse rally would be memorialized in documents provided to the US Secret Service, the sources said.
    The secret meetings were apparently known by only a small number of aides, the sources said. Grisham recounted that they were mostly scheduled by Trump’s chief of staff, Mark Meadows, and that the former chief usher, Timothy Harleth, would wave participants upstairs, the sources said…. Over the course of her hours-long interview, Grisham told House investigators that the mystery surrounding Trump’s promise at the Ellipse rally that he would march with his supporters to the Capitol might be resolved in Trump White House documents, the sources said.

    While Trump never ended up going to the Capitol, investigators are still keenly interested in the promise he made to go, and whether he did that in the hopes of inciting the insurrection. According to Grisham, Trump’s intentions would be noted in the “presidential line-by-line,” a document that outlines the president’s movements. As The Guardian notes, that document “could also reveal discussions about security concerns and suggest a new line of inquiry into why an assessment about conditions that were too dangerous for the president were not disseminated further.” All of which sounds pretty bad!

    Meanwhile, if you’re wondering if all this could end in criminal charges for Trump…it can! While the House panel itself does not have the authority to levy criminal charges, as The New York Times reported earlier this month, it can “provide the Justice Department with evidence of any wrongdoing it unearths in its investigation” and make a criminal referral. For example, following a criminal referral for contempt of Congress last fall, the Justice Department chose to criminally indict Stephen Bannon, with charges that could add up to two years in prison. According to the Times, “investigators are looking into whether a range of crimes were committed” in connection with January 6, including if Trump obstructed Congress in his attempt to stop the certification of Joe Biden’s win and “dereliction of duty” for doing nothing to stop the violence until hours after the fact.


    Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”


  2. The Following User Groans At Joe Capitalist For This Awful Post:

    Grokmaster (01-23-2022)

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Joe Capitalist For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (01-21-2022)

  4. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default


  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Jack For This Post:

    Joe Capitalist (01-21-2022)

  6. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,186
    Thanks
    35,730
    Thanked 50,680 Times in 27,325 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Extraordinary how the one, single, solitary holdout on the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas, was so eager to get on his knees and French kiss Trump's flabby ass.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (01-21-2022)

  8. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    16,111
    Thanks
    6,966
    Thanked 9,364 Times in 6,036 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 602 Times in 566 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Extraordinary how the one, single, solitary holdout on the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas, was so eager to get on his knees and French kiss Trump's flabby ass.
    Still, an 8 to 1 ruling is pretty freaking strong and powerful. Trump is FUCKED!!!

    Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”


  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Joe Capitalist For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (01-21-2022)

  10. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,186
    Thanks
    35,730
    Thanked 50,680 Times in 27,325 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Capitalist View Post
    Still, an 8 to 1 ruling is pretty freaking strong and powerful. Trump is FUCKED!!!

    It also shows Clarence Thomas is so far outside the spectrum of legitimate jurisprudence, he isn't really a judge.

    He is a man whore who would gladly take it up the bum from Trump.

  11. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    16,111
    Thanks
    6,966
    Thanked 9,364 Times in 6,036 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 602 Times in 566 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    It also shows Clarence Thomas is so far outside the spectrum of legitimate jurisprudence, he isn't really a judge.

    He is a man whore who would gladly take it up the bum from Trump.
    Eh, I don't give a shit about Clarence. The fact is, all of Trump's SCOTUS nominees voted against him. Isn't that hilarious?
    I bet Trump had a major Shit-fit over that. I would've loved to have seen that live?

    Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”


  12. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    29,128
    Thanks
    4,038
    Thanked 12,331 Times in 8,491 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 2,701 Times in 2,506 Posts

    Default

    It is not a good sign for the alt right when their god king is trying to cover up evidence.

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    16,111
    Thanks
    6,966
    Thanked 9,364 Times in 6,036 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 602 Times in 566 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Walt View Post
    It is not a good sign for the alt right when their god king is trying to cover up evidence.
    And it's not a good sign that Trump's cover-up is not working either. His Jan. 6 documents are in the hands of the committee.

    It's only a matter of time. Trump is fucked!!!


    Judge Juan M. Merchan wrote that Trump “appears to take the position that his situation and this case are unique and that the pre-trial publicity will never subside. However, this view does not align with reality.”


  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    135,306
    Thanks
    13,304
    Thanked 40,973 Times in 32,288 Posts
    Groans
    3,664
    Groaned 2,869 Times in 2,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    you've been saying Trump is screwed for five years now.....obviously time is not a factor.......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Grokmaster (01-23-2022)

  16. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,644
    Thanks
    18,222
    Thanked 15,646 Times in 10,702 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    HOW IS HE "FUCKED"? There is nothing incrminating in those docs, or we would have already known. This is just more FUCKHEAD STALINIST HOUSE POLITBURO KABUKI THEATER....
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  17. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,640
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 19,282 Times in 13,411 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 842 Times in 801 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    you've been saying Trump is screwed for five years now.....obviously time is not a factor.......
    Reality isn't either...

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to T. A. Gardner For This Post:

    Grokmaster (01-23-2022)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-30-2019, 02:27 PM
  2. Replies: 52
    Last Post: 05-22-2019, 07:36 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-31-2018, 12:44 PM
  4. Trump admits to collusion while throwing Donny Jr. "under the bus".
    By Tacomaman in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-07-2018, 01:10 PM
  5. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-02-2017, 02:23 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •