Originally Posted by
T. A. Gardner
Actually, not. The preamble is like an executive summary in a long report. It isn't the 'meat and potatoes' of the Constitution and is essentially a throw-away sentence in importance.
The Constitution, as written, was meant as a check on government, a restraint. "To promote the common welfare" is so vague a statement as to be meaningless other than as a platitude. What restraint is placed on that statement? What are the limits of it? That's how the rest of the Constitution is framed, so why would those writing it put in a clause or sentence that could be interpreted so broadly as to render most of the rest of the document meaningless unless that sentence was meant to be meaningless?
Why include a meaningless sentence? The Courts have said you are wrong. There is significant meaning in the preamble, its a roadmap for how to read the remainder. I agree it does not carry force of law, but it is significant to show the intent of the founders. I do not believe any word in the Constitution is meaningless.
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
Bookmarks