Originally Posted by
Mina
Yes, and I'm preserving that. I haven't suggested changing any standards about what constitutes libel or slander. The burden of proof would remain identical to today. I've just suggested rule changes that would even the economic playing field, so that such suits are a practical option for regular people, not just for the elite. And it could well REDUCE the amount of nuisance litigation, since wealthy folks used to abusing our court systems to intimidate their critics, like Nunes and Trump, would know that when their half-baked suits inevitably fail, they'll wind up having to pay their target's litigation costs. As it currently stands, that often isn't the case, meaning a scumbag vexation litigant like Trump can eat the losses of case after case, knowing that the legal costs hit his targets harder than him, relative to their respective incomes. If it costs $50k for each of them, that's going to be nothing for a millionaire like Trump, but potentially ruinous for the regular folks he preys on.
Bookmarks