Members banned from this thread: Cypress, evince, moon, domer76, Micawber, ThatOwlWoman, Jade Dragon, Guno צְבִי, LV426, Old Trapper, reagansghost, Poor Richard Saunders, gemini104104, Trumpet, Doc Dutch, BartenderElite, Diesel, BidenPresident and Hoosier Daddy


Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Professor Ian Plimer: Climate ‘scientists’ admit to lying, cheating & fraud

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default Professor Ian Plimer: Climate ‘scientists’ admit to lying, cheating & fraud

    .
    Those on my ban list have earned their places, they should consider it a badge of honour.

    ACCORDING to green activists, climate change policies don’t need to be costed because they’re a moral issue.

    Do green activists have a household budget? Whether it’s their own money or that of taxpayers, there has to be fiscal responsibility.

    Climate “scientists” operate as green activists who admit they cheat, lie, commit fraud, change measurements, make false predictions, refuse normal scientific discussion and prevent the publishing of alternative data…

    Ian Plimer
    Emeritus Professor of Earth Sciences

    The first moral issue is that climate activists ignore the evidence of the totality of integrated Earth systems and of history.

    They refuse to debate, they do not analyse data, resort to fraud, do not consider the consequences of their policies and they don’t really care about the damage their policies create.

    FUTILITY

    The second real moral issue is their futility trying to engineer a climate within a narrow range having no understanding of the impact to the environment to the diversity of flora and fauna and to the damage of so many Western countries.

    This damage is treated as mere detritus on the path to salvation.

    Taxpayer-funded climate “scientists” operate as green activists who admit they cheat, lie, commit fraud, change measurements, make false predictions, refuse normal scientific discussion and prevent the publishing of alternative data and conclusions.

    This is the seed of the whole corrupt climate change business.

    Their antics are not expensive amusement but the destruction of the 2500 year-old scientific method which is one way of finding a truth.

    Climate “scientists” remain unchallenged by a fawning scientifically illiterate politicised media.

    For hundreds of thousands of years, humans and other organisms have adapted and flourished to great and rapid natural climate changes. Surely adaptation by an advanced technological society would be easier.

    Future climate change predictions are based on computer models that have consistently failed over the past 40 years when compared with the reality of actual measurements.

    The end result of changing the whole energy system based on this nonsense is an energy crisis.

    During the time I was writing my book Green Murder, the coal price rose 100 per cent and LNG price 500 per cent. Don’t tell me that fossil fuels are on the path to extinction. They are needed for survival.

    The new green religion is a doomsday cult where the naïve and gullible seek salvation through the veneration of cruciform wind turbines and “settled science” that has replaced Scripture.

    Fire and brimstone preachers cancel, de-platform and abuse those who question green dogma with all the savagery that was used by the Spanish inquisitors to root out heretics.

    What is touted today as “progressive” is in reality a regressive drift back to the Dark Ages with its misery, poverty and ignorance.

    The greens are not a soft cuddly feel-good political movement trying to make the planet a better place.

    Their green propaganda appeals to many of the young and well off.

    It is a communist-inspired destructive hypocritical western movement that destroys democracy and cares not for the environment.

    By their actions and consequences, greens kill people. There is nothing virtuous or admirable about being green.

    STRUGGLE

    Today’s green religion is like the children’s game of musical chairs, a game designed to ensure that someone always misses out.

    With wind and solar electricity, someone always loses. These are the people on struggle street who cannot afford to pay the increasing electricity costs, especially when they face long-term unemployment as a result of COVID-19 virus lockdowns.

    It is immoral, unnecessary, futile and anti-human.

    There is a move now from European socialists, the UN and COP participants that the freedom losses experienced with COVID-19 lockdowns should be extended and that all citizens should have a climate passport where every atom of carbon used will be on a register to be monitored and taxed. This is communism. Cui bono.

    Net-zero is a mindless meaningless slogan. It is undefined. What exactly is net-zero? What do we use? What don’t we use? Where is the due diligence?

    If it means no fossil fuel use then we go back 200 hundred years. We’ve been there. Endless mud, dung, shortened lives, disease, no heating, no cooling, nothing of the modern world and no hope.

    Some EU leaders are telling us that under net-zero we will own nothing and be happy. I call this communist slavery. We’ve been there before and it all failed at great cost.

    Net-zero has no costings and you can bet your bottom dollar, because that’s all you’ll have left, that your money will make the green billionaires even wealthier.

    Net-zero is a cooked-up recipe for economic and social chaos, class division and further destruction of the west and its values.

    INVASION

    The collapse in the values of Western civilisation is a far greater threat than climate change or China.

    There is no need for a Chinese invasion or war, we are destroying and enslaving ourselves from within.

    In just one year, parts of the West have collapsed into an energy crisis of their own making. This is a window into net-zero.

    If such facts offend you, so be it. Take a daily teaspoon of cement to harden up, broaden your knowledge, reduce your biases and challenge your thinking.

    My book Green Murder contains facts underpinned by repeatable validated evidence and the scientific method. No matter how offended you might be, feelings are not evidence.

    Green activists are able to get away with murder because they are unchallenged. Certa Bonum Certamen. Don’t let them get away with it.

    In this book I charge the greens with murder. They murder humans who are kept in eternal poverty without coal-fired electricity.

    They support slavery and early deaths of black child miners.

    They murder forests and their wildlife by clear felling for mining and wind turbines. They murder forests and wildlife with their bushfire policies.

    SUICIDE

    They murder economies producing unemployment, hopelessness, collapse of communities, disrupted social cohesion and suicide.

    They murder free speech and freedoms and their takeover of the education system has ended up in the murdering of the intellectual and economic future of young people.

    They terrify children into mental illness with their apocalyptic death cult lies and exaggerations.

    They try to divide a nation. They are hypocrites and such angry ignorant people should never touch other people’s money.

    The greens are guilty of murder. The sentence is life with no parole in a cave in the bush enjoying the benefits of net-zero.PC

    – Ian Plimer

    Professor Ian Plimer’s latest book Green Murder (www.greenmurder.com) will be released by Connor Court Publishing late November 2021. Pre-publication orders are discounted and signed.
    https://politicom.com.au/climate-sci...heating-fraud/
    Last edited by cancel2 2022; 12-06-2021 at 09:17 PM.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    32,857
    Thanks
    19,749
    Thanked 9,460 Times in 7,746 Posts
    Groans
    836
    Groaned 510 Times in 503 Posts

    Default

    Ehh, argument from authority fallacy.
    Sorry?

  3. The Following User Groans At Matt Dillon For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (12-06-2021)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Dillon View Post
    Ehh, argument from authority fallacy.
    Sorry?
    What??

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    32,857
    Thanks
    19,749
    Thanked 9,460 Times in 7,746 Posts
    Groans
    836
    Groaned 510 Times in 503 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Primavera View Post
    What??

    I'm sorry, but that's an argument from authority fallacy to put stock in this. (the way it's framed)

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Dillon View Post
    I'm sorry, but that's an argument from authority fallacy to put stock in this. (the way it's framed)

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Dillon View Post
    I'm sorry, but that's an argument from authority fallacy to put stock in this. (the way it's framed)
    Could you explain that in English?

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    virginia
    Posts
    8,434
    Thanks
    4,335
    Thanked 5,466 Times in 3,391 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 1,143 Times in 1,048 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Primavera View Post
    .
    Those on my ban list have earned their places, they should consider it a badge of honour.



    https://politicom.com.au/climate-sci...heating-fraud/
    Another claim of lying that is itself a lie. The posted article is sheer screed, nothing better than a howl in the dark. Seems ever since Trump's Stolen Election became The Big Lie his followers have been searching for lies to throw back at the man's accusers. This example is pitiful from start to finish.
    "Give pearls away and rubies but keep your fancy free."

  9. The Following User Groans At martin For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (12-07-2021)

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to martin For This Post:

    Phantasmal (12-07-2021)

  11. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by martin View Post
    Another claim of lying that is itself a lie. The posted article is sheer screed, nothing better than a howl in the dark. Seems ever since Trump's Stolen Election became The Big Lie his followers have been searching for lies to throw back at the man's accusers. This example is pitiful from start to finish.
    What the fuck does Trump have to with climate chicanery?

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    32,694
    Thanks
    4,516
    Thanked 15,224 Times in 10,695 Posts
    Groans
    550
    Groaned 579 Times in 563 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    The ultimate faceoff, the founder of the weather channel and the talking dickhead, Brian Helter Skelter

    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Dutch View Post
    Agreed. Shooting angry Trumpers should be a national pastime.
    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    Only conclusion. Going to a Christian school causes you to be a mass murderer.

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    21,174
    Thanks
    3,418
    Thanked 7,931 Times in 5,908 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 444 Times in 424 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by martin View Post
    Another claim of lying that is itself a lie. The posted article is sheer screed, nothing better than a howl in the dark. Seems ever since Trump's Stolen Election became The Big Lie his followers have been searching for lies to throw back at the man's accusers. This example is pitiful from start to finish.
    well both "scientists" behind the hockey stick scam have admitted to it publicly.
    and the 97% approval myth was debunked years ago.
    so it looks pretty true.
    "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
    The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 106
    Last Post: 10-29-2020, 06:26 AM
  2. Climate science consensus of ALL climate scientists
    By Micawber in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-31-2019, 09:32 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-07-2018, 06:20 AM
  4. Climate scientists trying to influence policy through fraud
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-09-2017, 10:18 AM
  5. Fed-up Climate Scientists Call for Strong Climate Treaty
    By blackascoal in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-07-2007, 10:08 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •