Members banned from this thread: PostmodernProphet, Truth Detector, Jim Eagle, Sailor and Stone


Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 60

Thread: Why the fuss over aborton & how the SCOTUS rules on it, is much ado about nothing....

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    22,034
    Thanks
    7,543
    Thanked 9,619 Times in 6,398 Posts
    Groans
    2,021
    Groaned 1,501 Times in 1,389 Posts

    Default Why the fuss over aborton & how the SCOTUS rules on it, is much ado about nothing....

    ...and why abortion will not only NOT cease to exist, but become even more commonplace than ever before.

    The answer is simple... abortion pills.

    There are multiple safe and effective brands available to women.

    One I looked into is called Misoprostol that causes a woman's body to abort a pregnancy.

    Often sold in pharmacies, misoprostol is inexpensive, easy to store and handle, and is a safe method for people seeking to end their pregnancy. The medication softens and dilates the cervix, causes uterine contractions, and pushes pregnancy tissue out. Misoprostol’s multidimensional use in medicine makes it more accessible when compared to other abortion pills, like mifepristone. Misoprostol is 85% successful in inducing abortion in the first trimester, when used as recommended.

    https://iwhc.org/resources/abortion-...l-guide-women/
    So let's say the SCOTUS strikes down Roe v Wade but they cannot outlaw abortion outright so they leave it up to individual states. And let's say that they let stand the absurd law that allows people to sue anyone who assistes a woman obtaining an abortion in any way, (which is something I doubt they'll do anyway as it will probably be ruled unconstitutional).

    But what will happen in such a scenario?

    In my opinion, women in non abortion states will just be able to order any of these abortion pills online, have them delivered through the mail, have their abortion in the privacy of their own homes and there will be nothing anyone can do about it.

    Even if steps are taken by Bible thumping rwnj zealots to try to stop or discourage it, or even if nutjobs try to sue companies selling the pills, or states make having an abortion a crime, the operations can be moved to other states where it is legal, or even to other counries where the US civil code has no jurisdiction.

    Long and short of it.... abortions will continue unabated and unhindered, even if the out of control right does everything they can to try to stop it. Thanks to the rwnj fundie Bible nitwits, the number of abortions in this country will probably INCREASE substantially rather than decrease or go away.

    Before long, having an abortion will be similar to taking a shit. Women will take a pill, sit on the toilet dump the unwanted glob of cells and flush it down the sewer.

    Nice work, MORONS!!!!

    Dumbasses.
    https://i.postimg.cc/PqVCnGks/gojoe1.jpg
    C'MON MAN!!!!

  2. The Following User Groans At Nomad For This Awful Post:

    Earl (12-03-2021)

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nomad For This Post:

    AProudLefty (12-03-2021), ThatOwlWoman (12-03-2021)

  4. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Posts
    18,499
    Thanks
    10,622
    Thanked 5,015 Times in 4,166 Posts
    Groans
    395
    Groaned 167 Times in 164 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    ...and why abortion will not only NOT cease to exist, but become even more commonplace than ever before.

    The answer is simple... abortion pills.

    There are multiple safe and effective brands available to women.

    One I looked into is called Misoprostol that causes a woman's body to abort a pregnancy.



    So let's say the SCOTUS strikes down Roe v Wade but they cannot outlaw abortion outright so they leave it up to individual states. And let's say that they let stand the absurd law that allows people to sue anyone who assistes a woman obtaining an abortion in any way, (which is something I doubt they'll do anyway as it will probably be ruled unconstitutional).

    But what will happen in such a scenario?

    In my opinion, women in non abortion states will just be able to order any of these abortion pills online, have them delivered through the mail, have their abortion in the privacy of their own homes and there will be nothing anyone can do about it.

    Even if steps are taken by Bible thumping rwnj zealots to try to stop or discourage it, or even if nutjobs try to sue companies selling the pills, or states make having an abortion a crime, the operations can be moved to other states where it is legal, or even to other counries where the US civil code has no jurisdiction.

    Long and short of it.... abortions will continue unabated and unhindered, even if the out of control right does everything they can to try to stop it. Thanks to the rwnj fundie Bible nitwits, the number of abortions in this country will probably INCREASE substantially rather than decrease or go away.

    Before long, having an abortion will be similar to taking a shit. Women will take a pill, sit on the toilet dump the unwanted glob of cells and flush it down the sewer.

    Nice work, MORONS!!!!

    Dumbasses.

    It will cease to be government funded and the practice of all taxpayers donating to the DNC involuntarily will cease as well.

    Also your disgusting disregard for human life is duly noted.

  5. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Matt Dillon For This Post:

    Earl (12-03-2021), Grokmaster (12-03-2021), redfish (12-03-2021), TOP (12-03-2021)

  6. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    93,161
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Dillon View Post
    Also your disgusting disregard for human life is duly noted.
    Perhaps DEMOCRATS still don't consider Black people to be human.


  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    43,791
    Thanks
    15,792
    Thanked 11,978 Times in 9,200 Posts
    Groans
    448
    Groaned 2,417 Times in 2,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    I think it is about the Principle of a woman having control of her own body.
    It is the Religious Types that want to 'control' women into being 'obedient'.
    It is interesting that the Religious Types are in support of Big Government interfering in a Citizen's Personal Life.

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jack For This Post:

    Geeko Sportivo (12-03-2021), Nomad (12-03-2021), ThatOwlWoman (12-03-2021)

  9. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    93,161
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jackoff View Post
    I think...

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    93,161
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jackoff View Post
    It is about the Principle of a woman having control of her own body.


  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    34,775
    Thanks
    52,207
    Thanked 15,138 Times in 11,656 Posts
    Groans
    31,490
    Groaned 2,263 Times in 2,126 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    I think it is about the Principle of a woman having control of her own body.
    It is the Religious Types that want to 'control' women into being 'obedient'.
    It is interesting that the Religious Types are in support of Big Government interfering in a Citizen's Personal Life.
    There are two bodies involved, Jacky. After a period of time , there are two hearts, two brains, two bodies. She can do what she wants to her body but the other body has rights, the main one is not to be murdered by the woman.

  12. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    43,791
    Thanks
    15,792
    Thanked 11,978 Times in 9,200 Posts
    Groans
    448
    Groaned 2,417 Times in 2,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    There are two bodies involved, Jacky. After a period of time , there are two hearts, two brains, two bodies. She can do what she wants to her body but the other body has rights, the main one is not to be murdered by the woman.


    That does seem to be the Argument.
    I believe the Consensus is that one is an Independent Living Being, ... while the other isn't.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Jack For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (12-03-2021)

  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    23,116
    Thanks
    1,050
    Thanked 49 Times in 40 Posts
    Groans
    2,732
    Groaned 648 Times in 283 Posts

    Default Margaret Sanger founded Planned Parenthood


  15. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    34,775
    Thanks
    52,207
    Thanked 15,138 Times in 11,656 Posts
    Groans
    31,490
    Groaned 2,263 Times in 2,126 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    That does seem to be the Argument.
    I believe the Consensus is that one is an Independent Living Being, ... while the other isn't.
    A beating heart does not happen in a dead body, Jack. It is a living being. If it isn’t, why the need to kill it?

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Earl For This Post:

    PostmodernProphet (12-03-2021)

  17. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    43,791
    Thanks
    15,792
    Thanked 11,978 Times in 9,200 Posts
    Groans
    448
    Groaned 2,417 Times in 2,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    A beating heart does not happen in a dead body, Jack. It is a living being. If it isn’t, why the need to kill it?

    I think the reasoning is that the Independent Human Being gets to make the Decision, NOT the Ayatollah.

  18. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    34,775
    Thanks
    52,207
    Thanked 15,138 Times in 11,656 Posts
    Groans
    31,490
    Groaned 2,263 Times in 2,126 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    I think the reasoning is that the Independent Human Being gets to make the Decision, NOT the Ayatollah.
    Do you have any more gems, Jacky?

    The Ayatollah? Good grief, Jack.

    How about the duly authorized Supreme Court...6-3...the final arbiter of the law, as deemed their responsibility and duty by the Constitution, make the decision.

    Why do you not understand our system of Justice and the Constitution?

  19. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    43,791
    Thanks
    15,792
    Thanked 11,978 Times in 9,200 Posts
    Groans
    448
    Groaned 2,417 Times in 2,233 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    Do you have any more gems, Jacky?

    The Ayatollah? Good grief, Jack.

    How about the duly authorized Supreme Court...6-3...the final arbiter of the law, as deemed their responsibility and duty by the Constitution.

    Why do you not understand our system of Justice and the Constitution?

    So, you support 'Abortion on Demand'. 50 years is a long time, Earl. Glad you finally came around.

  20. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    58,191
    Thanks
    20,209
    Thanked 12,984 Times in 10,528 Posts
    Groans
    713
    Groaned 1,672 Times in 1,613 Posts

    Default



    Here's your attention you desperately need.

    Dachshund Lives Matter

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    please don't troll.



  21. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,902
    Thanks
    626
    Thanked 3,648 Times in 2,955 Posts
    Groans
    217
    Groaned 124 Times in 122 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    ...and why abortion will not only NOT cease to exist, but become even more commonplace than ever before.

    The answer is simple... abortion pills.

    There are multiple safe and effective brands available to women.

    One I looked into is called Misoprostol that causes a woman's body to abort a pregnancy.



    So let's say the SCOTUS strikes down Roe v Wade but they cannot outlaw abortion outright so they leave it up to individual states. And let's say that they let stand the absurd law that allows people to sue anyone who assistes a woman obtaining an abortion in any way, (which is something I doubt they'll do anyway as it will probably be ruled unconstitutional).

    But what will happen in such a scenario?

    In my opinion, women in non abortion states will just be able to order any of these abortion pills online, have them delivered through the mail, have their abortion in the privacy of their own homes and there will be nothing anyone can do about it.

    Even if steps are taken by Bible thumping rwnj zealots to try to stop or discourage it, or even if nutjobs try to sue companies selling the pills, or states make having an abortion a crime, the operations can be moved to other states where it is legal, or even to other counries where the US civil code has no jurisdiction.

    Long and short of it.... abortions will continue unabated and unhindered, even if the out of control right does everything they can to try to stop it. Thanks to the rwnj fundie Bible nitwits, the number of abortions in this country will probably INCREASE substantially rather than decrease or go away.

    Before long, having an abortion will be similar to taking a shit. Women will take a pill, sit on the toilet dump the unwanted glob of cells and flush it down the sewer.

    Nice work, MORONS!!!!
    Dumbasses.
    Why do you think they don't do that already? I'm sure some do but there are still 600,000 abortions per year. A pill seems easier and cheaper.

Similar Threads

  1. scotus rules trump can use funds for the wall
    By tsuke in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 98
    Last Post: 07-29-2019, 02:13 PM
  2. SCOTUS Rules in favor of Colorado Bakers
    By Irish Exit in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 199
    Last Post: 06-06-2018, 07:49 PM
  3. SCOTUS rules against secularism
    By Darth Omar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-26-2017, 07:44 PM
  4. APP - SCOTUS rules in favor of planned parenthood
    By Don Quixote in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-28-2013, 07:26 PM
  5. scotus rules on anonymous donations
    By Schadenfreude in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-01-2011, 08:10 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •