Supreme Court Justice Thomas Terrifies Pro-Abortion Left With ONE Opening Question

[BattleofHodow]

Because he hates women


Fetuses have more rights than women do according to him

Both should have rights.

[evince]

It’s what these men want


To make women lesser beings than men under the law


A person with a penis can own the body of a woman

[BattleofHodow]

It’s what these men want


To make women lesser beings than men under the law


A person with a penis can own the body of a woman

You want to make the unborn unequal & Women have the only say!?

PS.
Blacks & Latinos combined make up the major of aborted.

[NiftyNiblick]

So, do you have the right to HARM a pre-viable baby?


In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that the fetus' had a inherent constitutionally protected right is the right to be born

In which case the SCOTUS fucked up badly.

[NiftyNiblick]

To a mother that doesn't want it, an embryo or fetus is no different than a malignant tumor.
That's my position morally.

[volsrock]

It’s what these men want


To make women lesser beings than men under the law


A person with a penis can own the body of a woman

You love all those black babies that are aborted

[evince]

You love all those black babies that are aborted

You don’t get to decide what happens INSIDE the bodies of people who are NOT YOU

[evince]

Want to end abortion?



All men are forcibly altered


Sound fair?

[Hoosier Daddy]

”Does a mother have a right to ingest drugs and harm a pre-viable baby? Can the state bring child neglect charges against the mother?


Attachment 21384

who in the hell is pro-abortion, dumbass? but that is a good question.

[Hoosier Daddy]

Both should have rights.

fetuses should have the same rights as a kidney or liver. until they are alive. then they have human rights.

[Guno צְבִי]

Not everyone is a christer

Jewish law does not share the belief common among abortion opponents that life begins at conception, nor does it legally consider the fetus to be a full person deserving of protections equal those accorded to human beings. In Jewish law, a fetus attains the status of a full person only at birth. Sources in the Talmud indicate that prior to 40 days of gestation, the fetus has an even more limited legal status, with one Talmudic authority (Yevamot 69b) asserting that prior to 40 days the fetus is “mere water.” Elsewhere, the Talmud indicates that the ancient rabbis regarded a fetus as part of its mother throughout the pregnancy, dependent fully on her for its life — a view that echoes the position that women should be free to make decisions concerning their own bodies.

[volsrock]

Want to end abortion?



All men are forcibly altered


Sound fair?

Women get tubes tied

[Hoosier Daddy]

So, do you have the right to HARM a pre-viable baby?


In 2018, the Supreme Court ruled that the fetus' had a inherent constitutionally protected right is the right to be born

IN IRELAND, DUMBFUCK.

The Supreme Court has issued a landmark ruling that the unborn has no constitutional rights beyond the right to life contained in the Eighth Amendment.

In a keenly awaited judgment, the seven member court unanimously rejected a High Court ruling which found the unborn had other rights under the Constitution and was considered a child, with rights the State is expected to vindicate.

However, it upheld a finding by High Court judge Mr Justice Richard Humphreys that the Justice Minister was required to consider the prospective constitutional rights of the unborn when considering whether or not to deport their parent.

The ruling will remove much uncertainty ahead of the referendum the Government plans to hold in May to remove Article 40.3.3, better known as the Eighth Amendment, and to allow the Oireachtas to legislate to regulate the termination of pregnancy.

Delivering judgment in Limerick, Chief Justice Frank Clarke said it was the unanimous view of the court that the unborn does not have rights outside the right to life in the Eighth Amendment. It also found that the unborn was not considered to be a child for the purposes of Article 42A of the constitution, introduced with the passing of the children's rights referendum in 2012.

https://www.independent.ie/irish-new...-36682055.html

[archives]

”Does a mother have a right to ingest drugs and harm a pre-viable baby? Can the state bring child neglect charges against the mother?

It is a stupid question, wasn't Thomas' opening question, and didn't terrify anyone, in fact, it was dismissively answered and procedures quickly moved on to Justice Robert's questions

[Cinnabar]

Both should have rights.

SAVE THE FETUS/SCREW THE CHILD