Will the death of R v W kill the Republicans chances?

[Concart]

yup, I agree, except it is the right to privacy from government involvement in her medical decisions.

But if the limit removes that right, then there IS NO RIGHT.

[evince]

A family has the right to pull the plug



Surely a human in which the cells reside has some rights huh

What would a Court decide about one human being used as a blood supply hooked up to another human



Should the blood supplier have the right to not be hooked up to the other human ?

[evince]

That is the only case that would be the same as the abortion issue



No matter how the situation began



Does the person being the supplier have a right to end the situation?

[evince]

If you say NO

please explain why

[Jarod]

And it effectively removes a woman's right to an abortion, if heartbeat is the measure. The heartbeat begins as early as 3 weeks, but can't be detected until six or seven weeks. By the time you can determine whether there is a heartbeat, the door is closed. If that's the measure, Roe v Wade is dead.

Not heartbeat, he said brain activity to the point of brain stem activity. Heartbeat is very subjective, some call a muscle reflex a heartbeat but its not. Its not receiving a message from the brain to beat until much later.

[Jarod]

But if the limit removes that right, then there IS NO RIGHT.

There is still a right, its just totally outweighed by the embryo.

[evince]

If you claim a cluster of cells has the same rights as a child bearing age female


When does the host have a right to end the situation?

[evince]

There is still a right, its just totally outweighed by the embryo.

So how long would a blood supply person in my example be unable to end the situation?


Only nine months after it began?


Only when the supplied person gets well or dies?


At any piont the supplier decides?

[Jarod]

But if the limit removes that right, then there IS NO RIGHT.

IF, but the right would still exist in other circumstances.

[redfish]

If the supreme court overturns row versus Wade, the Democrats and liberals and independence will be fired up for the midterms. I think Mitch McConnell is quaking in his boots in fear that he will never again be majority leader. I suspect the court is going to come down with a split decision simply limiting Roe, not killing it, but we will see.

NO, what it will do is save milions of lives (mostly black and hispanic)

[Jarod]

NO, what it will do is save milions of lives (mostly black and hispanic)

Very unlikely. Coat-hangers are very available.

[redfish]

If you claim a cluster of cells has the same rights as a child bearing age female


When does the host have a right to end the situation?

an unborn human is not a "cluster of cells" you fricken asshole.

[Truth Detector]

If the supreme court overturns row versus Wade, the Democrats and liberals and independence will be fired up for the midterms. I think Mitch McConnell is quaking in his boots in fear that he will never again be majority leader. I suspect the court is going to come down with a split decision simply limiting Roe, not killing it, but we will see.

Wrong and you seldom exhibit anything that could be mistaken for "thinking." The court is not overturning anything. They are correcting a bad decision and remanding it back to the States where the issue always belonged.

I do wish you weren't a dishonest, partisan hack. Really I do. November is going to be harsh on low IQ leftists who hate this country and race hustle.

[redfish]

Very unlikely. Coat-hangers are very available.

if you don't want a kid, don't screw, its really quite simple.

[Truth Detector]

So, Democrats and liberals will be fired up if they can not murder babies.

That's pretty much the argument from the left and the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses.