Freedom of speech vs Technology

[BattleofHodow]

What are your thoughts on the Katyn massacre. Where the ruskies killed around 22,000 Polish POW's. The Nazis never did that shit with their prisoners. Really piss people off around here. (Or just about anywhere) Say that Hitler was actually the good guy. Sure, he invaded Poland. But what you're not allowed to know is that he had good reason to. Because ethnic Germans were being murdered in Poland. Either by pissed off Polish jews or Russian agents wanting to provoke Germany into invading. Which they could then join in on.

Who are the Polish Jews that provoked Nazi Germany!?

Herschel Grynszpan!?

While he was the son of Polish Jews he waa born in Germany.

Certainly his assassination didn't warrant violence against Poland or Jews for that matter.

Not that I support Grynszpan either.

[antiall]

Reagan's support for outpaced military spending far beyond the USSR & increased aid to Afghanistan rebels certainly seemed to help deprive Soviets of morale to make them less hopeful & entrenched to debt.

As for the USA similar applies.
Reagan promoted Amnesty, the end of the fairness doctrine & tolerance of Globalist free trade.

Unfortunately every USA president since has done next to nothing on those issues either.

Democrat and republican are just two different sides of the same corrupt coin.

[antiall]

DEMOCRATS

Democrats and republicans.

[The Anonymous]

Democrats and republicans.

Correct. Think both parties have you in their best interest?

[evince]

Reagan destroyed the USSR abruptly.
Reagan destroyed the USA in a much more slow & painful way.

Gorbachev changed the USSR

NOT Ronny

[evince]

Democrat and republican are just two different sides of the same corrupt coin.

Fuck off idiot


The Democratic Party has to keep saving us from the Republican Party asshole

[evince]

I wouldn't say Reagan destroyed the USSR. But he was good at slowly destroying the U.S. Though all republicans do that.

They have since Nixon




The Democratic Party keeps saving us

[Poor Richard Saunders]

There was a time in the U.S. where the concept of freedom of speech meant something. At one time we had something called the freedom of the press. It was considered to be the Fourth Estate. Which went along with the Executive, Judicial and Legislative branches of government. And generally considered to be the equal of the other three in importance. But it would seem that our new technology has put a stake through the heart of that idea. Because of technology we now have places for people to communicate electronically. For instance, in forums like this. But because they label themselves as "private entities," freedom of speech has no place. There is one forum out there where I can see why. Because the truth to some extent is allowed to be spoken there, the place is practically a ghost town. Maybe if all the forums were the same, instead of a place for the self deluded to hide in and speak to each other, that would be different.

Another blow against freedom of speech happen during the Reagan administration. There used to be a thing in the media called the fairness doctrine. Where two sides to any issue were given equal time. But Reagan killed that. I wonder how the incidents with george floyd or ahmaud arbery (for instance) would have been handled if the fairness doctrine was still in place. Is it time we were honest and took the image of George Washington off the dollar bill?

Attachment 21373

The fairness doctrine applied to broadcast media because the government owns the airwaves and sells it for use by those types of media. No other media was subject to the fairness doctrine and it didn't mean that flat earthers had to be given equal time. It was related to political issues. In these days of internet and cable news, the fairness doctrine would be just as dead if Reagan hadn't killed it since those sources would not be subject to the fairness doctrine.

[antiall]

We have all the free speech outlets we ever had plus thousands of new ones due to technology. Plus, the courts have expanded our free speech through interpretation. If you think you are being limited by one site go to 100 others.

An interesting hallucination. Apart from the one I mentioned, there is no forum out there that allows freedom of speech. At least not that I have found. Neither is it allowed on facebook or twitter. The only way you can have freedom of speech electronically is if you're talking to somebody on the telephone. And even then, the NSA monitors that. As for the "law," it is a joke too. Part of the reason is that jury's are a joke.

[evince]

Correct. Think both parties have you in their best interest?

The Democratic Party keeps saving us idiot

[AProudLefty]

An interesting hallucination. Apart from the one I mentioned, there is no forum out there that allows freedom of speech. At least not that I have found. Neither is it allowed on facebook or twitter. The only way you can have freedom of speech electronically is if you're talking to somebody on the telephone. And even then, the NSA monitors that. As for the "law," it is a joke too. Part of the reason is that jury's are a joke.

[Hoosier Daddy]

Democrat and republican are just two different sides of the same corrupt coin.

and you are a stupid shit clown who cannot tell right from wrong. what a dumbass piece of shit you are. read their platforms, read the laws they have passed and the ones they have fought so hard to keep from passing. you are an idiot. go to your room.

[antiall]

Actually the real ethnic slaughters weren't by Poles prior to WW2.

But, by Soviets & Nazi Germany against Poles.

Like the 1937-1938 Polish Operation of the NKVD against the Polish minority in Stalinist Russia.
Or
Operation Tannenberg starting in August of 1939 against Polish minorities in Germany.

Katyn Massacre was terrible but was dwarfed by Wola Massacre by Nazi Germany or Wolyn Massacre by Ukrainian Stefan Bandera supporters.

Try making some sense when you write. I never said anything about any ethnic slaughters by Poles prior to WW II. And as for WW II itself, just about everything you've been taught about it is a LIE. I could tell you some truth. And provide proof. But seeing how it would only get me banned, what's the point.

[BidenPresident]

We have all the free speech outlets we ever had plus thousands of new ones due to technology. Plus, the courts have expanded our free speech through interpretation. If you think you are being limited by one site go to 100 others.

Everyone in the world has free speech. A meaningless concept.

[Hoosier Daddy]

An interesting hallucination. Apart from the one I mentioned, there is no forum out there that allows freedom of speech. At least not that I have found. Neither is it allowed on facebook or twitter. The only way you can have freedom of speech electronically is if you're talking to somebody on the telephone. And even then, the NSA monitors that. As for the "law," it is a joke too. Part of the reason is that jury's are a joke.

what a paranoid sissy you are. as if the NSA monitors everybody's phone calls. you have freedom of speech in your house, in your front yard, all you want. but not in the public square. you cannot threaten to kill people, you cannot yell fire in a crowded restaurant, you cannot slander people publicly, or threaten them and otherwise be a threat TO OTHER PEOPLE. and only an idiot believes you can say whatever you want at work and not get fired or say whatever you want on social media platform and get banned if it is objectionable to the ones who run it. quit being a chickenshit bitch.