Not legally but anti-abortion people think it is immoral and therefore oppose it. If they want to make laws against it that is their political choice (within the limits of Roe). It doesn't matter if their opposition is based strictly on religion as long as the law itself does not address religion.
I have many opinions too, but I don't seek to shove them down the throats of other people and deprive them of their own personal freedom. For instance, I think tats might be pretty art, but they are (IMO) grossly disfiguring to the human body. Ditto for body piercings. Yet somehow I manage not to go picket in front of tattoo parlors and harangue those who go in to get decorated or punctured. Abortion ppl need to worry about their own bodies and keep their opinions off of other ppl's.
"Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain
AProudLefty (12-01-2021)
Why are two rapists sitting on the SCOTUS? That is the question.
BLUEXITA Modest Proposal For Separating Blue States From Red
Dear Red-State Trump Voter,
Let’s face it, guys: We’re done.
It is a tragedy that so much of the work that so many men and women toiled at for so long to make this a better country, and a better world, has been thrown away, leaving us all in such needless peril.
This is why our separation in all but name is necessary.
https://newrepublic.com/article/1409...mp-red-america
ThatOwlWoman (12-01-2021)
Agreed. But laws can prohibit abortion whether you call it murder or not. In some states shooting a pregnant woman and killing her child is a type of murder. The law can define murder however it chooses.
"The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."
Bookmarks