ASU is in a state where open carry of a firearm is legal, concealed carry of a firearm is legal, where people bring tanks and machineguns to the range for target practice, and somebody other than students from California going to ASU where the cost of living is so much lower that paying out-of-state tuition is a net reduction in cost, cares Rittenhouse is going there? Not damn likely.
Another day in Arizona at the gun range...
I thought he was only 17.....
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
anonymoose (11-29-2021), Into the Night (11-29-2021)
Into the Night (11-29-2021)
Isaiah 6:5
“Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”
ASU--at least in Arizona--has the reputation of being a mostly "party school" full of chowder-headed liberal arts majors and trust fund babies who are mostly there to play frisbee golf in December and for the cheap beer and takillya... It's often called AS Who?
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.
Rittenhouse - charged with murder and acquitted.
OJ - charged with murder and acquitted.
They look pretty similar to me.
Rittenhouse - charged with murder and acquitted.
Sandman - filmed in DC with a Native American - accused of mocking him.
They don't look that similar.
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid."
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."
Someone build those retarded/progressives a safe space! And, then, maybe teach them some basic law at some point during their four years...
"It [the draft] is duty rather than slavery. I part with the author on the caviler idea that individual freedom (whatever that may be to the person) leads to nirvana, anyone older that 12 knows that is BS."
-(Midcan5)
"Allow me to masturbate my patriotism furiously and publicly at this opportunity."
-(Ib1yysguy)
"There is no 'equal opportunity' today unless the government makes it so."
-(apple0154 )
"abortion is not killing Its birth control"
-(Desh)
Into the Night (11-29-2021)
Was OJ defending himself from Ron and Nicole? Why are progs so fucking retarded?
Chief Spreading Bull should be mocked. By everyone. I would have laughed so hard at the clown. The Sandman somehow maintained his composure. I guess you could accuse him of having no sense of humour.
"It [the draft] is duty rather than slavery. I part with the author on the caviler idea that individual freedom (whatever that may be to the person) leads to nirvana, anyone older that 12 knows that is BS."
-(Midcan5)
"Allow me to masturbate my patriotism furiously and publicly at this opportunity."
-(Ib1yysguy)
"There is no 'equal opportunity' today unless the government makes it so."
-(apple0154 )
"abortion is not killing Its birth control"
-(Desh)
Is that so?
A slander per se claim does not require that the plaintiff prove special damages.
This is because slander per se claims involve categories of defamatory statements that are presumed to be damaging to the plaintiff. While the categories may change a little from state to state, and evolve over the years, one of the most common slander per se categories is imputing criminal conduct to the plaintiff.
If the defamatory statement falls into the category of libel, the plaintiff only needs to prove the essential elements, i.e. 1) the defendant published a defamatory statement about the plaintiff and 2) other people were exposed to the statement.
There are no additional requirements because the law presumes that once the publication of a defamatory statement has been made in written or other formats, the statement will remain in the public sphere for a long time and continue to do harm.
Once the plaintiff has successfully proved defamation, "general damages" are presumed.
The plaintiff is not simply limited to damages reflecting his or her economic losses, but the mental anguish and other emotional distress that the law presumes to result from having your reputation harmed.
Depending on what the plaintiff proves about the defendant's intentions, and the type of defendant, punitive damages may also be awarded to the plaintiff.
https://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/civil-litigation/defamation-libel-slander.html
Bookmarks