Does anyone really believe the camera guy William Bryan murdered Arbery??

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Incorrect. he knew they were going to block him and do "something" with him. It just wound up being murder. He was involved in the planning and the blocking. he took videos to show his buddies how they fucked up some black guy.

No - bryan took videos to prove the white guys did not break any laws. And the video shows that. But it didn't matter. The press intimidated they jury into saying guilty.

[Flash]

You saying all juries should be sequestered? How else can you stop them from reading about the trial?

You don't need to sequester all, just those with a lot of emotion and media attention. Change of venue can also help.

The courts have overturned convictions due to publicity that could have unfairly biased the jury.

[Text Drivers are Killers]

You don't need to sequester all, just those with a lot of emotion and media attention. Change of venue can also help.

The courts have overturned convictions due to publicity that could have unfairly biased the jury.

The courts will overturn this one too but not for that reason. It's because the judge erred when he said the defendants could not talk about the criminal past of thug arbery!! Made no sense and you have to figure someone got to the judge. There are no honest judges in america.

[Flash]

The courts will overturn this one too but not for that reason. It's because the judge erred when he said the defendants could not talk about the criminal past of thug arbery!! Made no sense and you have to figure someone got to the judge. There are no honest judges in america.

That is usually standard. The person's past behavior is no proof of his conduct in the case being tried and only serves to bias the jury against the person (usually the defendant). They can only bring it up to rebut his testimony.

[Text Drivers are Killers]

That is usually standard. The person's past behavior is no proof of his conduct in the case being tried and only serves to bias the jury against the person (usually the defendant). They can only bring it up to rebut his testimony.

But not in this case. The defense was trying to show that the mcmichaels were making a citizens arrest because they thought arbery had just stolen something. The fact that arbery had a criminal past for stealing was very pertinent.

[Nordberg]

No - bryan took videos to prove the white guys did not break any laws. And the video shows that. But it didn't matter. The press intimidated they jury into saying guilty.

I can not believe how delusional you are.
Is a getaway driver guilty of robbing a bank?

[NiftyNiblick]

If the camera guy immediately used his footage to turn in the other two, he would have walked as a hero.

But, as we all know, stupid is as stupid does.
He acted as though he was with them, which he was.
Now the clown is fucked. Fuck him.

[Flash]

But not in this case. The defense was trying to show that the mcmichaels were making a citizens arrest because they thought arbery had just stolen something. The fact that arbery had a criminal past for stealing was very pertinent.

They had no evidence or probable cause he had stolen anything and were not aware of his criminal record. So those things were not pertinent in this case. They have to inform the suspect they are making a citizen's arrest according to the court testimony. Arbery had reason to fear for his life when being chased by three men with a shot gun.

[Text Drivers are Killers]

They had no evidence or probable cause he had stolen anything and were not aware of his criminal record.

They were aware of his criminal record. It was common knowledge arbery was a thug and thief. He's black ain't he? THINK

[Text Drivers are Killers]

I can not believe how delusional you are.
Is a getaway driver guilty of robbing a bank?

I'd say yes to that because he knew that was part of the deal. But is the getaway driver guilty of murder if one of the bank robbers kill someone??? THINK

[Flash]

They were aware of his criminal record. It was common knowledge arbery was a thug and thief. He's black ain't he? THINK

"Common knowledge" means nothing legally. Even if aware of his criminal record they had no evidence he had committed a crime because he didn't. You can't arrest somebody for their past record. They should have called the cops and let them investigate.

[Flash]

I'd say yes to that because he knew that was part of the deal. But is the getaway driver guilty of murder if one of the bank robbers kill someone??? THINK

In most states yes.

[Gondwanaland]

So what felony did bryan commit?

False imprisonment when he used his truck to hit and try to 'cage in' Arbery. Aggravated assault when he hit him with said truck. Both felonies.

[Gondwanaland]

They were aware of his criminal record. It was common knowledge arbery was a thug and thief. He's black ain't he? THINK

1. no, it was not common knowledge.
2. Someone having a past criminal record does not give you the right to chase them down and try to harm them on the street if you see them
3. What does his skin color have to do with anything, you racist fuck?