Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 97

Thread: Eisenhower's Holocaust.

  1. #61 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    164
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    Absolutely! I was happy to stomp him into the dirt for his lies, bullshit, and conspiracy theories...
    Oh, is that what you call parroting history written by the victors? How about "stomping" your way through the link in post #14.

  2. #62 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    164
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Guille View Post
    cultsmasher you're an idiot but on this topic Gardner isn't any better than you so I say have at it! Except you've been banned...again...so I guess it ain't happenin.
    Your sock accusation aside, what do you think the real story is.

  3. #63 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,585
    Thanks
    46,734
    Thanked 68,590 Times in 51,902 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fortify View Post
    Your sock accusation aside, what do you think the real story is.
    Dear Fucktified, chainbreak was, indeed, a sock for cultsmasher.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  4. #64 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,029
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,918 Times in 13,188 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 832 Times in 791 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fortify View Post
    Oh, is that what you call parroting history written by the victors? How about "stomping" your way through the link in post #14.
    I did read it. James Bacque, the 'historian' cited throughout the article almost singularly, has been repeatedly proved wrong on almost everything he's written.

    James Bacque’s book Other Losses caused a scandal when it was first published thirty years ago. Bacque alleges that General Eisenhower intentionally caused the deaths by starvation or exposure of around a million German prisoners of war held in Western internment camps briefly after the Second World War.

    After the book’s publication, a group of academic historians held a symposium at the University of New Orleans to review it. They came to the unanimous conclusion that the book was seriously flawed: documents are misread, evidence against the author’s conclusions is presented in a misleading fashion or hidden in footnotes, the statistics (a key argument for Bacque’s allegations) are hopelessly inaccurate, there are innumerable errors of fact and figures, and the major historical source is simply ignored. The texts of interviews of people involved in looking after German prisoners are actually falsified.
    https://positionpapers.ie/2019/06/ja...y-flawed-book/

    The claim to about 1 million German POW’s who died at the the allied camps
    was presented in a book by Canadian James Bacque, a novelist who has
    absolutely no credentials or reputation as a historian. Some comments
    on the work were made by Prof. Stephen Ambrose, director of the Eisenhower
    Center at the University of New-Orleans (a thorough refutation appears
    in the NYT, Feb. 24, 1991). Ambrose does admit that there was mistreatment
    of German POW’s in the spring and summer of 1945, but adds:

    “When scholars do the necessary research, they will find Mr. Bacque’s
    work to be worse than worthless. It is seriously – nay, spectacularly –
    flawed in its most fundamental aspects”
    . For example, Bacque’s
    extrapolation of one million deaths is based on on a typographical error
    in a single army medical report. Ambrose wrote “[Bacque] arrived at
    his most basic conclusion, a death rate at all camps of 30 percent, by
    dividing the 21,000 deaths by the 70,000 prisoners [listed in the
    report]… all other figures in the document make it clear that that the
    correct number of the prisoners was 700,000. This would make the death
    rate not 30 percent but 3 percent”.
    https://www.nizkor.org/bacque-1-bacque-james/

    Even on this site Bacque has been refuted:

    https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=8614

    In this book, James Bacque analyzes recently declassified KGB archives of Post-World War II figures to reach the conclusion that Eisenhower and the Western Allies maliciously starved 9.3 million German expellees, POWs and civilians simply out of indignation and subsequently initiated an immense cover-up. Bacque claims that the Allies accomplished this enormous act of vengeance through the disruption of agriculture and manufacturing, intentional prevention of food deliveries and the implementation of "unnecessary" squalid conditions in the inmate camps. Bacque, while providing absolutely no concrete evidence of bodies, utilizes subjective oral histories and a perplexing array of figures to selectively extrapolate statistics while accusing the Americans and the British of being inherently "warlike" people and predisposed to violence. Bacque emphasizes the gravity of German POW maltreatment and praises Herbert Hoover for his humanitarian efforts in helping initiate a worldwide food campaign that allegedly helped save 800 million people. Bacque also asserts that this perceived mass murder of Germans is the longest running "big lie" perpetuated by historians and governments alike.
    https://marcuse.faculty.history.ucsb...997Coon08z.htm

    So, while I took the time to read most of that tripe in the link in post #14, it was virtually a complete waste of my time.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to T. A. Gardner For This Post:

    Taichiliberal (05-15-2022)

  6. #65 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    20,801
    Thanks
    5,108
    Thanked 5,632 Times in 4,084 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,357 Times in 1,282 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fortify View Post


    Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
    No, he just got his ass handed to him and left in humiliation. My contribution was Post #8.



    Nice hallucination. In many ways. If the link in post #1 didn't do it for you, check out the one in post #14.
    You are having a nice hallucination, bunky. You go from one documented liar to a discredited hack in the never ending circle jerk of Nazi apologist/revisionists. But reality and decent research will always be your undoing:


    - The problem for Bacque is that he cannot read most of this massive and exciting new scholarship because he does not read German. He also does not read Russian. So the claims of his exhaustive research in the "KGB archives" (which to our knowledge are only restrictively open to researchers!) should be taken with a big grain of salt. Many stories have surfaced about Russian archives opening their holdings selectively to those who are willing to pay for it. Bacque's second volume, Crimes and Mercies, was first published in German by Ullstein in Berlin (a publishing house well aware of the popularity of revisionist scholarship among German veteran circles). A panel of scholars gathered at the annual German Studies Association meeting in Salt Lake City in October 1999 and found the charges of Crimes and Mercies even more extravagant and pig-headed than those proffered in Other Losses. Here Bacque was construing a vast conspiracy about many millions of German refugees perishing in Germany at the end of the war as a result of Allied neglect. The GSA papers were never published, however, since the business of refuting Bacque's claims again and again and in detail gives more credence to his wild conspiracy history. Trying to revive the debate now is yet another attempt by him to gain acceptability in the scholarly community.

    - The mountain of evidence has been building that Bacque's charge of the "missing million" supposedly perishing in the American (and French) POW camps in Germany and France is based on completely faulty interpretation of statistical data. There was never any serious disagreement that the German POWs were treated badly by the U.S. Army and suffered egregiously in these camps in the first weeks after the end of the war. That the chaos of the war's end would also produce potentially mismatches and errors in record keeping should surprise no one either. But there was NO AMERICAN POLICY to starve them to death as Bacque asserts and NO COVER UP either after the war. No question about it, there were individual American camp guards who took revenge on German POWs based on their hatred of the Nazis.


    https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/1266
    During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.

    George Orwell

  7. #66 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    2,734
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 98 Times in 94 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 41 Times in 39 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fortify View Post
    It isn't necessary. Go to the first page. Post #1. You will see the original thread and who posted it. He was stopped. As you can see by the word "banned." There is also a link in it to click on. If that doesn't do it for you, go to post #14. There is an even better link for you to click on. Find out about Eisenhower's holocaust. Keep in mind that there was no holocaust against the jews.
    While it appears from many that the Holocaust never happened have to wonder why McHeil's Navy attacked a US Naval Hospital stealing & burning a US Constitution in 1971 as if it was a continuation of Nazi Germany's Kristallnacht which obviously was part of the Catholic Church bartering Jewish Holocaust deaths for Islam oil prior to Mengele "Angel of Death" baptize thine eyes by urinations concentration camp medical care that has been continued with those burning Bush's Arab "death to the infidels" health care plan Federal Lynching KKK churchstate of hate fiefdom of thieving National Archives purchased US Constitutions - old glories presented by Ike to Holocaust survivors for business excellence & Israel hand scribed old testaments arsonists. It's no wonder those crooks on Capital Hill in Nazington, Diatribe of Christiananality pedophilia under color of law malfeasance interpretation of "one nation under God with equal justice under law" tradition of thieving Eisenhower presented old glorys over decades has the same value in their "man is God" Peter Principle pyramid scheme as Islam fabricated human reproduction medical pseudoscience virgin Mary misnomer immaculate son of Allah Jesus the Christ conception to perpetuate Christian suicidal super ego sociopsychopathilogical homicidal human farming just as Russia's rootin' tootin' Putin fabricated Ukraine Nazis misnomer.

  8. #67 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    164
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    I did read it. James Bacque, the 'historian' cited throughout the article almost singularly, has been repeatedly proved wrong on almost everything he's written.


    https://positionpapers.ie/2019/06/ja...y-flawed-book/


    https://www.nizkor.org/bacque-1-bacque-james/

    Even on this site Bacque has been refuted:

    https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=8614


    https://marcuse.faculty.history.ucsb...997Coon08z.htm

    So, while I took the time to read most of that tripe in the link in post #14, it was virtually a complete waste of my time.
    So, the truth is a waste of your time. Interesting. Luckily for you, dead men tell no tales. Maybe this one will interest you.
    https://allthatsinteresting.com/rheinwiesenlager

    There is much to reference here.
    http://whale.to/b/starvation_of_germans.html

    Or maybe this might interest you.
    https://prepareforchange.net/2019/07...ed-after-wwii/


    Like it or not, allied forces were no angels. Though for the winning side, the allies and the U.S. in particular, no effort was spared in making them appear to be angels. Would you expect different? Anybody who can fool people into believing that there was a jewish holocaust and fool them into believing anything.

  9. #68 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    164
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
    You are having a nice hallucination, bunky. You go from one documented liar to a discredited hack in the never ending circle jerk of Nazi apologist/revisionists. But reality and decent research will always be your undoing:


    - The problem for Bacque is that he cannot read most of this massive and exciting new scholarship because he does not read German. He also does not read Russian. So the claims of his exhaustive research in the "KGB archives" (which to our knowledge are only restrictively open to researchers!) should be taken with a big grain of salt. Many stories have surfaced about Russian archives opening their holdings selectively to those who are willing to pay for it. Bacque's second volume, Crimes and Mercies, was first published in German by Ullstein in Berlin (a publishing house well aware of the popularity of revisionist scholarship among German veteran circles). A panel of scholars gathered at the annual German Studies Association meeting in Salt Lake City in October 1999 and found the charges of Crimes and Mercies even more extravagant and pig-headed than those proffered in Other Losses. Here Bacque was construing a vast conspiracy about many millions of German refugees perishing in Germany at the end of the war as a result of Allied neglect. The GSA papers were never published, however, since the business of refuting Bacque's claims again and again and in detail gives more credence to his wild conspiracy history. Trying to revive the debate now is yet another attempt by him to gain acceptability in the scholarly community.

    - The mountain of evidence has been building that Bacque's charge of the "missing million" supposedly perishing in the American (and French) POW camps in Germany and France is based on completely faulty interpretation of statistical data. There was never any serious disagreement that the German POWs were treated badly by the U.S. Army and suffered egregiously in these camps in the first weeks after the end of the war. That the chaos of the war's end would also produce potentially mismatches and errors in record keeping should surprise no one either. But there was NO AMERICAN POLICY to starve them to death as Bacque asserts and NO COVER UP either after the war. No question about it, there were individual American camp guards who took revenge on German POWs based on their hatred of the Nazis.


    https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/1266
    He didn't read German? Neither can I. But there are programs out there that can translate any document into English. And he was far from the only one to speak of such things. That aside, there were many documents that were destroyed about what went on after the war. And like it or not, Eisenhower did indeed have many German prisoners classified as Disarmed Enemy Forces to get around any protections of them under the Geneva Convention Protections. In post #67 I posted some links. Check them out.

  10. #69 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,029
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,918 Times in 13,188 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 832 Times in 791 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fortify View Post
    So, the truth is a waste of your time. Interesting. Luckily for you, dead men tell no tales. Maybe this one will interest you.
    https://allthatsinteresting.com/rheinwiesenlager

    There is much to reference here.
    http://whale.to/b/starvation_of_germans.html

    Or maybe this might interest you.
    https://prepareforchange.net/2019/07...ed-after-wwii/


    Like it or not, allied forces were no angels. Though for the winning side, the allies and the U.S. in particular, no effort was spared in making them appear to be angels. Would you expect different? Anybody who can fool people into believing that there was a jewish holocaust and fool them into believing anything.
    All that almost entirely single sources back to Bacque. Repetition proves nothing.

  11. #70 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Posts
    164
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    All that almost entirely single sources back to Bacque. Repetition proves nothing.
    You sure seem to have a bug up your ass when it comes to "Other Losses" by James Bacque. For all the trouble people apparently went through to try and prove him wrong, it almost certainly means that he was right. And from what I was reading, there were MANY other sources besides him.

  12. #71 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,029
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 18,918 Times in 13,188 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 832 Times in 791 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fortify View Post
    You sure seem to have a bug up your ass when it comes to "Other Losses" by James Bacque. For all the trouble people apparently went through to try and prove him wrong, it almost certainly means that he was right. And from what I was reading, there were MANY other sources besides him.
    Argumentum ad nauseam in the form of a gambler's fallacy. If there are "MANY other sources" so far you have failed to show any of them.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to T. A. Gardner For This Post:

    Taichiliberal (05-17-2022)

  14. #72 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    20,801
    Thanks
    5,108
    Thanked 5,632 Times in 4,084 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,357 Times in 1,282 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fortify View Post

    Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
    You are having a nice hallucination, bunky. You go from one documented liar to a discredited hack in the never ending circle jerk of Nazi apologist/revisionists. But reality and decent research will always be your undoing:


    - The problem for Bacque is that he cannot read most of this massive and exciting new scholarship because he does not read German. He also does not read Russian. So the claims of his exhaustive research in the "KGB archives" (which to our knowledge are only restrictively open to researchers!) should be taken with a big grain of salt. Many stories have surfaced about Russian archives opening their holdings selectively to those who are willing to pay for it. Bacque's second volume, Crimes and Mercies, was first published in German by Ullstein in Berlin (a publishing house well aware of the popularity of revisionist scholarship among German veteran circles). A panel of scholars gathered at the annual German Studies Association meeting in Salt Lake City in October 1999 and found the charges of Crimes and Mercies even more extravagant and pig-headed than those proffered in Other Losses. Here Bacque was construing a vast conspiracy about many millions of German refugees perishing in Germany at the end of the war as a result of Allied neglect. The GSA papers were never published, however, since the business of refuting Bacque's claims again and again and in detail gives more credence to his wild conspiracy history. Trying to revive the debate now is yet another attempt by him to gain acceptability in the scholarly community.

    - The mountain of evidence has been building that Bacque's charge of the "missing million" supposedly perishing in the American (and French) POW camps in Germany and France is based on completely faulty interpretation of statistical data. There was never any serious disagreement that the German POWs were treated badly by the U.S. Army and suffered egregiously in these camps in the first weeks after the end of the war. That the chaos of the war's end would also produce potentially mismatches and errors in record keeping should surprise no one either. But there was NO AMERICAN POLICY to starve them to death as Bacque asserts and NO COVER UP either after the war. No question about it, there were individual American camp guards who took revenge on German POWs based on their hatred of the Nazis.

    https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/1266



    He didn't read German? Neither can I. But there are programs out there that can translate any document into English. And he was far from the only one to speak of such things. That aside, there were many documents that were destroyed about what went on after the war. And like it or not, Eisenhower did indeed have many German prisoners classified as Disarmed Enemy Forces to get around any protections of them under the Geneva Convention Protections. In post #67 I posted some links. Check them out.
    Possibly for Germany, but newsflash for ya, genius.....the info in question wasn't just checked out like a library....your boy did his research in Russia on the premises, and it's highly unlikely that they gifted him with a translator because he just asked.

    And another eye opener for you; just because you've got a group of people who believe in something doesn't make it true. That is a common misconception in revisionism. As for your additional links, you could have saved yourself the trouble if you had read the following in my response, "...
    - The mountain of evidence has been building that Bacque's charge of the "missing million" supposedly perishing in the American (and French) POW camps in Germany and France is based on completely faulty interpretation of statistical data. There was never any serious disagreement that the German POWs were treated badly by the U.S. Army and suffered egregiously in these camps in the first weeks after the end of the war. That the chaos of the war's end would also produce potentially mismatches and errors in record keeping should surprise no one either. But there was NO AMERICAN POLICY to starve them to death as Bacque asserts and NO COVER UP either after the war. No question about it, there were individual American camp guards who took revenge on German POWs based on their hatred of the Nazis."


    My links plus Post#65 offers enough academic analysis to cast more than serious doubt as to Bacque's accuracy. You're entitled to your own beliefs, but not to your own facts.
    During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.

    George Orwell

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Taichiliberal For This Post:

    christiefan915 (05-20-2022)

  16. #73 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    20,801
    Thanks
    5,108
    Thanked 5,632 Times in 4,084 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,357 Times in 1,282 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fortify View Post
    You sure seem to have a bug up your ass when it comes to "Other Losses" by James Bacque. For all the trouble people apparently went through to try and prove him wrong, it almost certainly means that he was right. And from what I was reading, there were MANY other sources besides him.
    A fantastic display of convoluted logic on your part....if there are numerous people who present evidence that a person is wrong, then he must be right?

    You do realize how stupid that is, right?
    During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.

    George Orwell

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Taichiliberal For This Post:

    christiefan915 (05-20-2022)

  18. #74 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    8,281
    Thanks
    1,421
    Thanked 2,597 Times in 1,937 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 661 Times in 608 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chainbreak View Post
    I was having an interesting time in my thread, "The holocaust never happened. Deal with it." But being an apparently forbidden topic, it went away. And TA Gardner was getting ready to unleash a can of military history whoopass on me. That would have been funny. Sorry I missed it. But I have some real history for you all. I wonder how long it will last.

    https://rense.com/general46/germ.htm
    You as a rancid troll and your bullshit site amounts to a turd compared to President Dwight D. Eisenhower's, legacy, and you want to know way? Well here are the reasons why versus your trolling gutter bs:

    President Dwight D. Eisenhower as a lawfully elected POTUS:

    Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower (born David Dwight Eisenhower; /ˈaɪzənhaʊ.ər/; October 14, 1890 – March 28, 1969) was an American military officer and statesman who served as the 34th president of the United States from 1953 to 1961. During World War II, he served as Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force in Europe, and achieved the five-star rank of General of the Army. He planned and supervised the invasion of North Africa in Operation Torch in 1942–1943 and the invasion of Normandy from the Western Front in 1944–1945.

    Eisenhower was born into a large family of mostly Pennsylvania Dutch ancestry in Denison, Texas, and raised in Abilene, Kansas. His family had a strong religious background, and his mother became a Jehovah's Witness. Eisenhower, however, belonged to no organized church until 1952. He graduated from West Point in 1915 and later married Mamie Doud, with whom he had two sons. During World War I, he was denied a request to serve in Europe and instead commanded a unit that trained tank crews. Following the war, he served under various generals and was promoted to the rank of brigadier general in 1941. After the United States entered World War II, Eisenhower oversaw the invasions of North Africa and Sicily before supervising the invasions of France and Germany. After the war, he served as Army Chief of Staff (1945–1948), as president of Columbia University (1948–1953) and as the first Supreme Commander of NATO (1951–1952).

    In 1952, Eisenhower entered the presidential race as a Republican to block the isolationist foreign policies of Senator Robert A. Taft, who opposed NATO and wanted no foreign entanglements. Eisenhower won that election and the 1956 election in landslides, both times defeating Adlai Stevenson II. Eisenhower's main goals in office were to contain the spread of communism and reduce federal deficits. In 1953, he considered using nuclear weapons to end the Korean War, and may have threatened China with nuclear attack if an armistice was not reached quickly. China did agree and an armistice resulted which remains in effect. His New Look policy of nuclear deterrence prioritized inexpensive nuclear weapons while reducing funding for expensive Army divisions. He continued Harry S. Truman's policy of recognizing Taiwan as the legitimate government of China, and he won congressional approval of the Formosa Resolution. His administration provided major aid to help the French fight off Vietnamese Communists in the First Indochina War. After the French left, he gave strong financial support to the new state of South Vietnam. He supported regime-changing military coups in Iran and Guatemala orchestrated by his own administration. During the Suez Crisis of 1956, he condemned the Israeli, British, and French invasion of Egypt, and he forced them to withdraw. He also condemned the Soviet invasion during the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 but took no action. After the Soviet Union launched Sputnik in 1957, Eisenhower authorized the establishment of NASA, which led to the Space Race. He deployed 15,000 soldiers during the 1958 Lebanon crisis. Near the end of his term, he failed to set up a summit meeting with the Soviets when a U.S. spy plane was shot down over the Soviet Union. He approved the Bay of Pigs Invasion, which was left to John F. Kennedy to carry out."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower

  19. #75 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    2,734
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 98 Times in 94 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 41 Times in 39 Posts

    Default

    Default
    Quote Originally Posted by chainbreak View Post
    I was having an interesting time in my thread, "The holocaust never happened. Deal with it." But being an apparently forbidden topic, it went away. And TA Gardner was getting ready to unleash a can of military history whoopass on me. That would have been funny. Sorry I missed it. But I have some real history for you all. I wonder how long it will last.]QUOTE

    https://rense.com/general46/germ.htm
    Quote Originally Posted by gemini104104 View Post
    You as a rancid troll and your bullshit site amounts to a turd compared to President Dwight D. Eisenhower's, legacy, and you want to know way? Well here are the reasons why versus your trolling gutter bs:

    President Dwight D. Eisenhower as a lawfully elected POTUS:

    Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower (born David Dwight Eisenhower; /ˈaɪzənhaʊ.ər/; October 14, 1890 – March 28, 1969) was an American military officer and statesman who served as the 34th president of the United States from 1953 to 1961. During World War II, he served as Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force in Europe, and achieved the five-star rank of General of the Army. He planned and supervised the invasion of North Africa in Operation Torch in 1942–1943 and the invasion of Normandy from the Western Front in 1944–1945.

    Eisenhower was born into a large family of mostly Pennsylvania Dutch ancestry in Denison, Texas, and raised in Abilene, Kansas. His family had a strong religious background, and his mother became a Jehovah's Witness. Eisenhower, however, belonged to no organized church until 1952. He graduated from West Point in 1915 and later married Mamie Doud, with whom he had two sons. During World War I, he was denied a request to serve in Europe and instead commanded a unit that trained tank crews. Following the war, he served under various generals and was promoted to the rank of brigadier general in 1941. After the United States entered World War II, Eisenhower oversaw the invasions of North Africa and Sicily before supervising the invasions of France and Germany. After the war, he served as Army Chief of Staff (1945–1948), as president of Columbia University (1948–1953) and as the first Supreme Commander of NATO (1951–1952).

    In 1952, Eisenhower entered the presidential race as a Republican to block the isolationist foreign policies of Senator Robert A. Taft, who opposed NATO and wanted no foreign entanglements. Eisenhower won that election and the 1956 election in landslides, both times defeating Adlai Stevenson II. Eisenhower's main goals in office were to contain the spread of communism and reduce federal deficits. In 1953, he considered using nuclear weapons to end the Korean War, and may have threatened China with nuclear attack if an armistice was not reached quickly. China did agree and an armistice resulted which remains in effect. His New Look policy of nuclear deterrence prioritized inexpensive nuclear weapons while reducing funding for expensive Army divisions. He continued Harry S. Truman's policy of recognizing Taiwan as the legitimate government of China, and he won congressional approval of the Formosa Resolution. His administration provided major aid to help the French fight off Vietnamese Communists in the First Indochina War. After the French left, he gave strong financial support to the new state of South Vietnam. He supported regime-changing military coups in Iran and Guatemala orchestrated by his own administration. During the Suez Crisis of 1956, he condemned the Israeli, British, and French invasion of Egypt, and he forced them to withdraw. He also condemned the Soviet invasion during the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 but took no action. After the Soviet Union launched Sputnik in 1957, Eisenhower authorized the establishment of NASA, which led to the Space Race. He deployed 15,000 soldiers during the 1958 Lebanon crisis. Near the end of his term, he failed to set up a summit meeting with the Soviets when a U.S. spy plane was shot down over the Soviet Union. He approved the Bay of Pigs Invasion, which was left to John F. Kennedy to carry out."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower
    Obviously one of Byrd's KKK West Nazi Germany Virginia & the Federal Lynching KKK churchstate of hate fiefdoms's Chirstiananality pedophilia man is God diatribe where "Eisenhower is still a war criminal".

Similar Threads

  1. Obama Ain’t No Eisenhower
    By Flanders in forum Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories Forum
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 12-09-2020, 08:38 AM
  2. Eisenhower was a Republican
    By katzgar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-13-2020, 06:41 AM
  3. Eisenhower On Syria; History
    By Anti-Party in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-05-2013, 11:59 AM
  4. An Eisenhower Quote
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 03-18-2012, 07:22 AM
  5. Is Obama and Eisenhower or a Reagan?
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-05-2008, 08:47 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •