Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 57 of 57

Thread: Can they deny the 1st Amendment right for hate speech felons?

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    87,043
    Thanks
    35,071
    Thanked 21,785 Times in 17,104 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,344 Times in 2,263 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    No cognitive dissonance. Has any governmental entity tried to restrict those videos? It might be constitutional if they did.

    But, it doesn't fit any of the guidelines allowing government to restrict our freedoms. Something offensive isn't justification for restricting our rights.

    Quit watching that stuff. That is why they make it available.
    Huh?

  2. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,913
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,761 Times in 4,510 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Huh?
    Quit watching videos of cutting off people's heads.

  3. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    87,043
    Thanks
    35,071
    Thanked 21,785 Times in 17,104 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,344 Times in 2,263 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    Quit watching videos of cutting off people's heads.
    Why? The SCOTUS deems that it's my right.

  4. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,913
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,761 Times in 4,510 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Why? The SCOTUS deems that it's my right.
    In poor taste...

  5. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,668
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 19,305 Times in 13,426 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 843 Times in 802 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Why? The SCOTUS deems that it's my right.
    Snuff films are generally illegal everywhere...

  6. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    87,043
    Thanks
    35,071
    Thanked 21,785 Times in 17,104 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,344 Times in 2,263 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    Snuff films are generally illegal everywhere...
    Those are generally fake. They cannot confirm they are real. I've seen plenty of them. Watch the movie 8mm.

  7. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    38,668
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 19,305 Times in 13,426 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 843 Times in 802 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Those are generally fake. They cannot confirm they are real. I've seen plenty of them. Watch the movie 8mm.

  8. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    87,043
    Thanks
    35,071
    Thanked 21,785 Times in 17,104 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,344 Times in 2,263 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    Yeppers. I've seen the worst of the worst videos. Are they real? You tell me.

    No clue why he brought up CP.

    As to the CP videos, why are the worst of the worst videos given a pass?

    Remember it's on Flash. Not me.

  9. #54 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    Shall not be infringed applies to your right to keep and bear arms. If I have a revolver that is an arm I keep and bear. Shall not be infringed does not say any type of arms.

    But, more seriously, I am going by state and federal laws that regulate firearms.

    Just as the Constitution allows reasonable restrictions on free speech, free press, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, protection against search and seizure...the same reasonable restrictions apply to firearms.
    there are numerous writings from the founders that make it very clear that congress had no authority over the arms of the people. That is what was recognized and ratified. the Constitution doesn't allow for those reasonable regulations, the courts made excuses to allow such things to happen
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

  10. #55 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,913
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,761 Times in 4,510 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by T. A. Gardner View Post
    Snuff films are generally illegal everywhere...
    True. There is still a big market in fake snuff films sold as real.

  11. #56 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,913
    Thanks
    1,067
    Thanked 5,761 Times in 4,510 Posts
    Groans
    297
    Groaned 185 Times in 181 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SmarterthanYou View Post
    there are numerous writings from the founders that make it very clear that congress had no authority over the arms of the people. That is what was recognized and ratified. the Constitution doesn't allow for those reasonable regulations, the courts made excuses to allow such things to happen
    Most gun regulations were at the state level which was not affected by the Bill of Rights.

  12. #57 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    61,597
    Thanks
    1,041
    Thanked 3,617 Times in 2,816 Posts
    Groans
    1,008
    Groaned 1,328 Times in 1,225 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    Most gun regulations were at the state level which was not affected by the Bill of Rights.
    true......and before the 14th Amendment, that was perfectly fine.......but we the people ratified the 14th Amendment which forces 'shall not be infringed' upon the states.........
    A sad commentary on we, as a people, and our viewpoint of our freedom can be summed up like this. We have liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, yet those very people look at Constitutionalists as radical and extreme.................so those liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans must believe that the constitution is radical and extreme.

Similar Threads

  1. Hate Crime & Hate Speech Ethics Were Invented By Socialists
    By Flanders in forum Religion, Philosophy, and Ethics
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-29-2019, 10:15 AM
  2. Hate speech
    By Evmetro in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 06-20-2018, 05:57 AM
  3. The slippery slope Liberals walk: Actually, hate speech is protected speech
    By Truth Detector in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-20-2017, 01:39 PM
  4. Portland mayor - "Hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment"
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-01-2017, 01:09 AM
  5. liberals hate first amendment
    By SmarterthanYou in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 221
    Last Post: 06-10-2009, 09:31 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •