Members banned from this thread: BRUTALITOPS, Minister of Truth, The Anonymous, cancel2 2022, PostmodernProphet, Legion, Truth Detector, Niche Political Commentor, Superfreak, volsrock, Yurt, Earl, Lord Yurt, OG Yurt, serenity, Yakuda and ParachuteAdams |
This is how bad our western biases are.
I went to Wikipedia's entry on natural law, in which there is extensive discussion on the development of intellectual thought on natural law, from the Greeks, to the Romans, to the Christian scholastics, to the Enlightenment Age thinkers.
Not a single mention of Zhu Xi or any other Neo-Confucian scholar who were exactly on the same track with their concept of a universal morality embedded in the natural order, a concept they called Li.
evince (10-09-2021)
Cypress (10-08-2021), evince (10-09-2021), ThatOwlWoman (10-08-2021)
evince (10-09-2021)
Order in a Confucian context just means to have good and proper relationships.
That meaning is obviously fluid, and means something different in the year 2021 than it did in 1144. There was more heirarchy in relationships a thousand years ago
To me, once one strips away anachronistic thinking, the overall philosophy is as valid today as it was a thousand years ago
evince (10-09-2021), Matt Dillon (10-08-2021), ThatOwlWoman (10-08-2021)
evince (10-09-2021), ThatOwlWoman (10-08-2021)
evince (10-09-2021), Matt Dillon (10-08-2021)
Bookmarks