Kyle Rittenhouse

[Into the Night]

The chronology of the posts shows that we've done this dance, Squawky. Like your icon, you've got nothing but repetition. I'm tire of you, so I'll just pull the rug from under your "rqaa, fallacy" BS:

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...29#post4785629

Say goodnight, Gracie.

Special pleading fallacy. Irrelevance fallacy. Argument of ignorance fallacy. Attempted proof by ignorance. No argument presented.

[Into the Night]

You forget that Taichiliberal denies these videos even exist.

[SmarterthanYou]

You forget that Taichiliberal denies these videos even exist.

his altar ego must be ana kasparian of the young turks

[SmarterthanYou]

I watch this video and I gotta say i'm actually very impressed with rittenhouses ability to be that effective, under that kind of stress, and all for being a 17 year old.........

for those claiming kyle was an 'active shooter', he had a multitude of targets that were yelling, threatening, chasing him, so why didn't he shoot until he was down on the ground and those 3 people tried to take advantage of it by killing him????

anyone else see the absolute effectiveness of killing the first few aggressors then watching the rest of the cowards scatter like cockroaches????

[Into the Night]

I watch this video and I gotta say i'm actually very impressed with rittenhouses ability to be that effective, under that kind of stress, and all for being a 17 year old.........

for those claiming kyle was an 'active shooter', he had a multitude of targets that were yelling, threatening, chasing him, so why didn't he shoot until he was down on the ground and those 3 people tried to take advantage of it by killing him????

anyone else see the absolute effectiveness of killing the first few aggressors then watching the rest of the cowards scatter like cockroaches????

[Taichiliberal]

Anyone that wants to can go look it up themselves. RQAA.

He's got nothing, dear readers.., Squawk, squawk!

[Taichiliberal]

You forget that Taichiliberal denies these videos even exist.

Again, where's the footage of the INITIAL CONTACT?

[Taichiliberal]

It figures that an alt-right coward and BS artist is your hero here. He disappeared right after Jan. 6th, then came back about 2 months later with a new icon...denouncing his years of oather/threeper screeds.

Yet he is STILL posting Lew Rockwell BS.

And again, what part of this video shows the initial point of contact? Who started it?

[Taichiliberal]

Special pleading fallacy. Irrelevance fallacy. Argument of ignorance fallacy. Attempted proof by ignorance. No argument presented.

Right, so Wisconsin law is all the fallacy blather you can muster.

You're done, Squawky. Carry on,.

[Taichiliberal]

You don't get to speak for anyone else. You only get to speak for you. Omniscience fallacy .

Already did. Argument of the stone fallacy.

Assumption of victory fallacy.

No argument presented.

Hey readers, Squawky says Wisconsin law that clearly demonstrates Rittenhouse's violation is yet another one of his neologism "fallacy".

Say goodnight, Gracie. https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...29#post4785629

[Taichiliberal]

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Squawky is babbling, dear readers. He'll NEVER admit he's wrong, like his god Cheeto Jeezus. But for the rational, objective reader, here's what Squawky is in denial of. Pay attention to section 948.60, then watch Squawky go off the deep end in denial.

WISCONSIN STATE LEGISLATURE

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/sta...tatutes/948/55

Insult fallacies. Lie. TDS. Buzzword fallacies. Psychoquackery. Special pleading fallacy. Cliche fallacy. Cherry picking fallacy.

Not the entire law, dumbass. You also seem to forget the JUDGE DISMISSED THIS CHARGE.

No cherry picking, genius.... A matter of fact. That you have a "judge" of questionable objectivity is not surprising who is essentially giving the defense it's case by saying "self defense" trumps any and all violations is unreal. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021...-kenosha-trial

One could only imagine the shrill squawks from you if it were a BLM sympathizer killing some self appointed "protector" during this past years riots and such.

You're done Squawky. Now, go figure how many more words you can add on to your "fallacy" screech. See ya next month.

[SmarterthanYou]

Again, where's the footage of the INITIAL CONTACT?

the one that shows rosenbaum chasing down rittenhouse and right before rosenbaum catches him, rittenhouse defends himself against the raging psychopath?

[Into the Night]

He's got nothing, dear readers.., Squawk, squawk!

RQAA. Attempted proof by stone.

[Into the Night]

Again, where's the footage of the INITIAL CONTACT?

RQAA.

[Into the Night]

It figures that an alt-right coward and BS artist is your hero here. He disappeared right after Jan. 6th, then came back about 2 months later with a new icon...denouncing his years of oather/threeper screeds.

Yet he is STILL posting Lew Rockwell BS.

And again, what part of this video shows the initial point of contact? Who started it?

Buzzword fallacy. Denial of history. TDS. RQAA.