ExpressLane (09-26-2021)
The stated goal behind mandatory vaccination policies is to protect against the spread of disease, meaning that the crux of any policy is immunity. The notion that a previous COVID-19 infection provides natural immunity that can be at least as good as vaccination in some people is something a judge would likely need to consider in a challenge to a mandatory policy, especially against a government actor.
“I think that a judge might reject a rule that's been issued by a body, like the U.S. Department of Labor or by a state, that has not been sufficiently thought through as it relates to the science,”
https://www.aol.com/finance/natural-...123106348.html
_________________
Thank you!
Think about that: a judge is going to have to step in and rescue science because Biden and Fauci are hell bent on jabbing every living soul when the science is clear that it’s not necessary. It may even be detrimental if it turns out we need more natural immunity in the mix to reach herd immunity.
The problem is Big Pharma pulls Fauci’s strings and Biden is everyone’s puppet, literally, so it’s Max Vax all the way, even though it’s going to cause a worker shortage in healthcare and other industries.
Sad state of affairs.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
ExpressLane (09-26-2021)
What a good judge would "reject" is the notion that a medical-science question is a subject of law. Courts should not settle this, and won't, at least not on a medical basis. It's possible on the other hand a court would hold on other grounds that an agency has overstepped its lawful authority
"Give pearls away and rubies but keep your fancy free."
Last edited by Darth Omar; 09-26-2021 at 08:59 AM.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
ExpressLane (09-26-2021), Lionfish (09-26-2021)
Darth Omar (09-26-2021)
that a long read but worth it. Notice the CDC cites a study not finding antibodies that is pre-delta while Cleveland and Israeli study are more upto date and do find such -as well as antibodies in the bones
Darth Omar (09-26-2021)
Why do you want more people to get COVID?
christiefan915 (09-26-2021), Guno צְבִי (09-26-2021)
You want people to get Covid with all its risks rather than get vaxxed? Why?
"The next step is understanding that a call to rely on “natural immunity” is, first and foremost, a call to get infected with COVID.
What many are calling “natural immunity” is just infection-mediated immunity as opposed to vaccine-mediated immunity. In addition to the risks of the acute infection—which include death—we still know little about “long COVID,” those lingering feelings of difficulty breathing, fatigue, brain fog, or a host of other symptoms that some people experience for months after infection."
https://www.thebulwark.com/what-is-natural-immunity-and-why-should-you-get-the-vaccine-even-if-you-already-had-covid/
“What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
― Charles Dickens
Cypress (09-26-2021), Guno צְבִי (09-26-2021)
Hello Darth,
The Supreme Court already ruled in favor of mandatory vaccinations in 1905:
"In Jacobson, a 7-2 majority upheld the compulsory vaccination law as a reasonable application of the state’s police powers. The decision is not only an important constitutional precedent; the majority opinion written by Justice John Marshall Harlan is also philosophical and eloquent. “There are manifold restraints to which every person is necessarily subject for the common good,” he wrote. “On any other basis, organized society could not exist with safety to its members. Society based on the rule that each one is a law unto himself would soon be confronted with disorder and anarchy.”"
Jacobson: Mandatory Vax is legal
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Cypress (09-26-2021), Guno צְבִי (09-26-2021), martin (09-26-2021)
"Give pearls away and rubies but keep your fancy free."
Guno צְבִי (09-26-2021)
For people to acquire natural immunity that means they had to acquire the disease.
It is well known that when that happens, people become contagious and also spread the disease.
That is what we need to stop doing.
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Guno צְבִי (09-26-2021)
The court uses juries to decide fact. That is consider a court decision. Juries only have power to make decisions because of the power of the court. The Judge only has power because of the power of the court. So when ones says Courts have ruled that means a ruling has come from a certain court not a specific Judge.
So me a jury has made a decision out of the authority of the court.
IMPEACH 46 FOR TREASON
Biden/Harris 2024
IT'S A NO BRAINER!
It has been done. The vaccine offers double the protection that natural immunity offers. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2...rotection.html Your odds of getting a breakthrough is much stronger if you shun the vaccine.
Guno צְבִי (09-26-2021)
Bookmarks