Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
Your reply is not responsive.
Lower courts have single judges. In all probability the case you have suggested would be decided at that level and only on appeal would be heard by a multiple judge court, all of which is completely beside the point. The question is whether any court would decide a medical treatment question raised by conflicting expert medical opinion.
"Give pearls away and rubies but keep your fancy free."
You’re making this sound harder than it will be.
As mentioned, both sides will call their expert witnesses. Except this time, instead of all them being ‘narrative friendly’ the plaintiffs will call witnesses that oppose the idea of jabbing the immune.
The legal question is simple: what is the *compelling* scientific justification for vaccinating the already immune? The justification has to be sufficiently compelling to over ride the rights of individuals or force them to take the jab against their will.
Btw, you haven’t answered that question.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
So does that mean that other mandated vaccines as say measles are illegal and need to be dropped?
There are too many precedents regarding vaccine mandates going back a century to reverse it now
And bottom line, last I heard, something like seventy to eighty percent of the population would have to get Covid to attain natural herd immunity, at that rate, the effect on the population would be devastating.
Antibody testing is not currently recommended to determine if you are immune to COVID-19 following COVID-19 vaccination. Antibody testing should also not be used to decide if someone needs to be vaccinated. CDC’s Interim Guidelines for COVID-19 Antibody Testing provide more information on how antibody testing should be used and interpreted.
Bookmarks