Ok, so if what the right wing media says is true and the 2020 election was fraudulent

[Joe Capitalist]

If there was illegal activity that took place to make Biden the winner, how do you explain all of the judges (many Trump-appointed) throwing out all of Trump's lawsuits? Wouldn't the judges have to be complicit in the crime? If the right is saying there was massive fraud in the 2020 election, then that would have to include the Trump-appointed judges as well and they are also guilty. Correct?

Stephanos Bibas, was appointed by President Donald Trump.
"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so," Bibas wrote. "Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here. Trump’s Campaign's claims have no merit."

[zappasguitar]

If there was illegal activity that took place to make Biden the winner, how do you explain all of the judges (many Trump-appointed) throwing out all of Trump's lawsuits? Wouldn't the judges have to be complicit in the crime? If the right is saying there was massive fraud in the 2020 election, then that would have to include the Trump-appointed judges as well and they are also guilty. Correct?

Stephanos Bibas, was appointed by President Donald Trump.
"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so," Bibas wrote. "Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here. Trump’s Campaign's claims have no merit."

The latest GOP talking point is that if only the Judges had EXAMINED the information, they'd have agreed to hear the Trump team's case.

Of course that's just more nonsensical BS.

The judges DID examine the information and found, like you cited, that the Trump Campaign's claims have no merit.

[Joe Capitalist]

The latest GOP talking point is that if only the Judges had EXAMINED the information, they'd have agreed to hear the Trump team's case.

Of course that's just more nonsensical BS.

The judges DID examine the information and found, like you cited, that the Trump Campaign's claims have no merit.

Now Trump is floating the idea that the Judges were 'afraid' to take on the case. As if judges can pick and choose their cases and if they don't like one, they can just turn it down. You think the TrumpTards will swallow that one like they swallowed the Clorox?

[Jarod]

If there was illegal activity that took place to make Biden the winner, how do you explain all of the judges (many Trump-appointed) throwing out all of Trump's lawsuits? Wouldn't the judges have to be complicit in the crime? If the right is saying there was massive fraud in the 2020 election, then that would have to include the Trump-appointed judges as well and they are also guilty. Correct?

Stephanos Bibas, was appointed by President Donald Trump.
"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so," Bibas wrote. "Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here. Trump’s Campaign's claims have no merit."

All liberal judges, even the ones Trump appointed.

[Truth Detector]

Ok, so if what the right wing media says is true and the 2020 election was fraudulent

OK, so if the election was as clean as a freshly fallen snow, why all the flailing, conniptions and attacks over doing a thorough audit?

You know how people who are lying or hiding something they get angry and lash out at anyone who doubts them? That pretty much sums up the media and Party of the Jackass when it comes to this Biden MIRACLE.

A guy who hid in his basement half the time, couldn't fill an elementary school, lacked any energy or enthusiasm, garners the highest participation and vote count in the history of the Republic. Now that is quite the feat.

[Truth Detector]

The latest GOP talking point is that if only the Judges had EXAMINED the information, they'd have agreed to hear the Trump team's case.

Of course that's just more nonsensical BS.

The judges DID examine the information and found, like you cited, that the Trump Campaign's claims have no merit.

The judges prevented any thorough audits of any voting machines. What are they afraid of? Why all the obstruction, attacks and flailing? If the election is above board, let's all make sure to everyone's satisfaction.

But alas, we know why there is so much angst, flailing and attacking.

[AProudLefty]

OK, so if the election was as clean as a freshly fallen snow, why all the flailing, conniptions and attacks over doing a thorough audit?

You know how people who are lying or hiding something they get angry and lash out at anyone who doubts them? That pretty much sums up the media and Party of the Jackass when it comes to this Biden MIRACLE.

A guy who hid in his basement half the time, couldn't fill an elementary school, lacked any energy or enthusiasm, garners the highest participation and vote count in the history of the Republic. Now that is quite the feat.

Why all the flailing, conniptions and attacks over the election fraud hoax?

They know that the election was clean and they refuse to accept it. See 1/6 as an example, Turd Digester.

[Truth Detector]

Now Trump is floating the idea that the Judges were 'afraid' to take on the case. As if judges can pick and choose their cases and if they don't like one, they can just turn it down. You think the TrumpTards will swallow that one like they swallowed the Clorox?

The Democratic Party of the Jackass, their constituents and the media seem terribly afraid of any thorough investigations. Why is that?

[T. A. Gardner]

If there was illegal activity that took place to make Biden the winner, how do you explain all of the judges (many Trump-appointed) throwing out all of Trump's lawsuits? Wouldn't the judges have to be complicit in the crime? If the right is saying there was massive fraud in the 2020 election, then that would have to include the Trump-appointed judges as well and they are also guilty. Correct?

Stephanos Bibas, was appointed by President Donald Trump.
"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so," Bibas wrote. "Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here. Trump’s Campaign's claims have no merit."

Actually, your argument here is a sweeping generalization using a propositional fallacy. For example, there are many reasons Trump's lawsuits could be thrown out for from technicalities like lack of standing, or improper filing, to being poorly constructed. There could also be bias on the part of some of the judges.

Second, the presence or absence of fraud doesn't hinge solely on what the courts decide. That too is part of your sweeping generalization.

I think you need to make a better case here.

Oh, I'll add that nothing in the above is an argument for or against their being fraud in the last presidential election.

[Truth Detector]

All liberal judges, even the ones Trump appointed.

Trump appointments?????!!!!!

[AProudLefty]

Actually, your argument here is a sweeping generalization using a propositional fallacy. For example, there are many reasons Trump's lawsuits could be thrown out for from technicalities like lack of standing, or improper filing, to being poorly constructed. There could also be bias on the part of some of the judges.

Second, the presence or absence of fraud doesn't hinge solely on what the courts decide. That too is part of your sweeping generalization.

I think you need to make a better case here.

Oh, I'll add that nothing in the above is an argument for or against their being fraud in the last presidential election.

LOL. That's a pretty good defense.

[Truth Detector]

Why all the flailing, conniptions and attacks over the election fraud hoax?

So you think election fraud is A OK and don't think it should be investigated?

They know that the election was clean and they refuse to accept it.

Really ass clown? Because you say so? Dunce. It was a MIRACLE don'tyaknow.

See 1/6 as an example, Turd Digester.

January 6th events are a direct result of a significant portion of the voting public believing it wasn't an honest election dumbass.

Were you dropped on your head as a child? There has to be something to explain your mental illness.

[AProudLefty]

So you think election fraud is A OK and don't think it should be investigated?

No the election fraud is not okay and of course it should be investigated.

Really ass clown? Because you say so? Dunce. It was a MIRACLE don'tyaknow.

And yet no evidence of election fraud so far. How do YOU know it was an election fraud?

January 6th events are a direct result of a significant portion of the voting public believing it wasn't an honest election dumbass.

That was my point, dumbfuck.

Were you dropped on your head as a child? There has to be something to explain your mental illness.

IRONY!!!

[Joe Capitalist]

No the election fraud is not okay and of course it should be investigated.
And yet no evidence of election fraud so far. How do YOU know it was an election fraud?
That was my point, dumbfuck.
IRONY!!!

So I guess Turd Digester's point is since so many uneducated, gullible, naive people believe it and raided the Capitol because of it, then it must be true.

[Grokmaster]

If there was illegal activity that took place to make Biden the winner, how do you explain all of the judges (many Trump-appointed) throwing out all of Trump's lawsuits? Wouldn't the judges have to be complicit in the crime? If the right is saying there was massive fraud in the 2020 election, then that would have to include the Trump-appointed judges as well and they are also guilty. Correct?

Stephanos Bibas, was appointed by President Donald Trump.
"Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so," Bibas wrote. "Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here. Trump’s Campaign's claims have no merit."

READ ARTICLE II of the CONSTITUTION ,THEN REVIEW ALL THE ELECTION LAWS ANDS STANDARDS CHANGED BY STATE EXECUTIVE BRANCHES, BY FIAT, INSTEAD OF THE LEGISLATURE.


HAVE ONE OF THE INTELLIGENT ,HONEST GROWNUPS EXPLAIN IT TO YOU....