Politico: Hunter laptop evidence all valid

[Nordberg]

One of the clearest examples is this:

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c48201...osecutor-fired

Biden got the top prosecutor in Ukraine fired over his investigating Burisma and Hunter and replaced by an incompetent, unqualified, and thoroughly corrupt one that dropped the case. Biden used a billion in foreign aid as leverage to get that done. A clear case of quid pro quo made even more clear by Bagman's laptop and the Biden crime family's partners in "business."

If Trump had done that he would have ended up in prison, or at a minimum actually convicted after impeachment. That's how obvious that case is. Biden bragged about it because he's a fucking retard who didn't realize he was giving himself up.

He did not. Burisma was being investigated for ignoring environmental regulations before they gave Hunter the job. 2 years of right-wing certainty and not a scrap of fact or evidence to back it up. This is a clear case of desperately wanting to believe a myth.

[T. A. Gardner]

He did not. Burisma was being investigated for ignoring environmental regulations before they gave Hunter the job. 2 years of right-wing certainty and not a scrap of fact or evidence to back it up. This is a clear case of desperately wanting to believe a myth.

If that's true, why is it any of Biden's business in an official capacity as Vice President to tell another country how to handle their internal affairs? That is what the prosecutor was doing. It had nothing directly to do with US interests whatsoever so why threaten to withhold foreign aid until he, specifically, is fired and replaced by someone acceptable to Biden.

[Nordberg]

If that's true, why is it any of Biden's business in an official capacity as Vice President to tell another country how to handle their internal affairs? That is what the prosecutor was doing. It had nothing directly to do with US interests whatsoever so why threaten to withhold foreign aid until he, specifically, is fired and replaced by someone acceptable to Biden.

It is true. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN1WC1LV You are being suckered by the right again. can you not see it?

[T. A. Gardner]

It is true. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN1WC1LV You are being suckered by the right again. can you not see it?

Doesn't change what I asked. Why would Biden get involved then? Why would he in his official capacity give a shit about what the Ukraine was doing internally? It is none of the US's business. Why would he want this specific prosecutor in Ukraine--the only time he's ever done something like that--fired instantly and immediately?

[Nordberg]

Doesn't change what I asked. Why would Biden get involved then? Why would he in his official capacity give a shit about what the Ukraine was doing internally? It is none of the US's business. Why would he want this specific prosecutor in Ukraine--the only time he's ever done something like that--fired instantly and immediately?

Joe had no power to do anything and no reason to. Burisma was being investigated for things Hunter had nothing to do with before he even got the job. Trump pushed the Ukraine to announce an investigation to help him win the election in America, It is a rt wing fabrication.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-h...-idUSKBN1WX1P7
I do not know why I keep giving you evidence showing the entire Burisma thing is fake, You rightys will never change your mind.

[T. A. Gardner]

Joe had no power to do anything and no reason to. Burisma was being investigated for things Hunter had nothing to do with before he even got the job. Trump pushed the Ukraine to announce an investigation to help him win the election in America, It is a rt wing fabrication.

Biden clearly told Ukraine, fire the prosecutor or you don't get a billion dollars in aid. That's absolutely clear and true. Ukraine fired the prosecutor and replaced him with a criminal, corrupt, incompetent (the guy didn't even have a law degree!) political hack and the Burisma investigation was dropped. That happened. It happened because Biden wanted it to and used US foreign aid money as the leverage to make it happen.

Again, what business was it of Biden's in his official capacity as Vice President to muck in the internal affairs of another nation?

[Nordberg]

Righys are hooked on lies and cannot get the hook out. https://www.factcheck.org/2020/10/tr...n-and-ukraine/ It is all a lie and TA will never accept he was wrong for swallowing the bait.

[T. A. Gardner]

Righys are hooked on lies and cannot get the hook out. https://www.factcheck.org/2020/10/tr...n-and-ukraine/ It is all a lie and TA will never accept he was wrong for swallowing the bait.

What in my post #51 is a "lie?" Which part is a false narrative? Relying on an op ed written by a group with a serious political slant to the Left that favors Democrats is scant proof on its own of anything.

One might note that that article never mentions who replaced Shokin and is mostly--about 80%--about what Trump said on this issue. I never mentioned Trump, or anything Trump said. Since the article otherwise is very short on facts about what happened other than Shokin being replaced after Biden used a billion in foreign aid money as a lever (a quid pro quo), it really doesn't prove anything about what I've asked. Not a single thing.

[Nordberg]

If that's true, why is it any of Biden's business in an official capacity as Vice President to tell another country how to handle their internal affairs? That is what the prosecutor was doing. It had nothing directly to do with US interests whatsoever so why threaten to withhold foreign aid until he, specifically, is fired and replaced by someone acceptable to Biden.

He was speaking for an accumulated fund that was earmarked to help Ukraine. The problem is the guy who was going to run it was as corrupt as you can get. Biden said they would not give the money if he was running it. The other countries that pitched in were happy he did it.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...or/5991434002/

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

He did not. Burisma was being investigated for ignoring environmental regulations before they gave Hunter the job. 2 years of right-wing certainty and not a scrap of fact or evidence to back it up. This is a clear case of desperately wanting to believe a myth.

Yes he did.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

He was speaking for an accumulated fund that was earmarked to help Ukraine. The problem is the guy who was going to run it was as corrupt as you can get. Biden said they would not give the money if he was running it. The other countries that pitched in were happy he did it.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...or/5991434002/

And that guy was investigating Hunter.

Stop being an idiot.

[MAGA MAN]

Why do JPP libs want to protect this pedophile?

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

Why do JPP libs want to protect this pedophile?

They're shitty human beings.

[Concart]

It is true. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN1WC1LV You are being suckered by the right again. can you not see it?

LOL, what Vice President, as a representative of the United States, and speaking with the backing of our allies and the IMF, would challenge corruption in another country?

T.A. Gardner is a fucking moron, along with being a Nazi.

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

LOL, what Vice President, as a representative of the United States, and speaking with the backing of our allies and the IMF, would challenge corruption in another country?

T.A. Gardner is a fucking moron, along with being a Nazi.

Don't call names just because you're in the bag for corrupt bidens.