Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 117

Thread: Why Is There Something, Rather Than Nothing?--Sean M. Carroll

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default Why Is There Something, Rather Than Nothing?--Sean M. Carroll

    It was Leibniz, in the eighteenth century, who first explicitly asked “Why is there something rather than nothing?” in the context of discussing his Principle of Sufficient Reason (“nothing is without a ground or reason why it is”) [5]. By way of an answer, Leibniz appealed to what has become a popular strategy: God is the reason the universe exists, but God’s existence is its own reason, since God exists necessarily. (There is a parallel with Aristotle’s much earlier invocation of an unmoved mover, responsible for motion in the universe without itself being moved by anything else.)

    https://authors.library.caltech.edu/...1802.02231.pdf

    Carroll concludes that the universe is just a brute fact. Have to agree. Leibniz tried to use God as a necessary cause, but this fails.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Trump and his supporters prove that there is nothing instead of something.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to AProudLefty For This Post:

    evince (10-06-2021)

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    "It seems natural to ask why the universe exists at all. Modern physics suggests
    that the universe can exist all by itself as a self-contained system, without anything external to create or sustain it. But there might not be an absolute answer
    to why it exists. I argue that any attempt to account for the existence of something rather than nothing must ultimately bottom out in a set of brute facts; the
    universe simply is, without ultimate cause or explanation."

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    SE USA
    Posts
    1,474
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 40 Times in 35 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 10 Times in 10 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    It was Leibniz, in the eighteenth century, who first explicitly asked “Why is there something rather than nothing?” in the context of discussing his Principle of Sufficient Reason (“nothing is without a ground or reason why it is”) [5]. By way of an answer, Leibniz appealed to what has become a popular strategy: God is the reason the universe exists, but God’s existence is its own reason, since God exists necessarily. (There is a parallel with Aristotle’s much earlier invocation of an unmoved mover, responsible for motion in the universe without itself being moved by anything else.)

    https://authors.library.caltech.edu/...1802.02231.pdf

    Carroll concludes that the universe is just a brute fact. Have to agree. Leibniz tried to use God as a necessary cause, but this fails.
    It fails for one reason, the purpose of making people believe in speculation of God rather than everyone completely understanding the systematic eternal separation of biological results occupying space here now in ever changing form defined cradle to grave socially, not ancestrally configured conceived to decomposed in plain sight each reproduction is limited to adapting as timed apart since conceived to replace those added the conception.

    Simple compounding DNA.
    Every brain born has a lifetime conflict with ancestral displacement and intellectual social position within the population present. Why, life is a compounding connection between inception, conception, death, extinction life doesn't exceed what exists now.

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Being part of the existence it is impossible to apprehend non-existence. I can fathom existence, the part I cannot wrap my head around
    is complete absence of all. I can conceive of everything collapsing into a point of infinite mass, I can think of all that is spread infinitely
    throughout spacetime. I cannot begin to think about nothingness. It's my human condition.

    Since I concede my failing in this regard, I cannot even get to the OP question about why one and not the other.

    I am going to proceed on the assumption there is no great deceiver and not wonder why, but to do and die,
    as Lord Tennyson instructed is our fate.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (10-06-2021), Trumpet (10-06-2021)

  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    I have no problem conceiving nothingness, seems pretty straightforward.

    The argument by Leibniz is that God had a choice whether to create a world or not. That nothingness is inferior to something is why God made the universe lo.
    Some would argue that it logically impossible for there to be just nothingness--I don't agree.

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    I have no problem conceiving nothingness, seems pretty straightforward.

    The argument by Leibniz is that God had a choice whether to create a world or not. That nothingness is inferior to something is why God made the universe lo.
    Some would argue that it logically impossible for there to be just nothingness--I don't agree.
    Leibniz- isn't that the same asshole who made that calculus notation we had to learn in AP math class?

  10. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Leibniz- isn't that the same asshole who made that calculus notation we had to learn in AP math class?
    Yeah, that him.

  11. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Posts
    616
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 222 Times in 160 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    I have no problem conceiving nothingness, seems pretty straightforward.

    The argument by Leibniz is that God had a choice whether to create a world or not. That nothingness is inferior to something is why God made the universe lo.
    Some would argue that it logically impossible for there to be just nothingness--I don't agree.
    It's not possible to conceive of nothingness except in an abstract sense. Even empty space is still something.

  12. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,600
    Thanks
    46,752
    Thanked 68,619 Times in 51,914 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    "It seems natural to ask why the universe exists at all. Modern physics suggests
    that the universe can exist all by itself as a self-contained system, without anything external to create or sustain it. But there might not be an absolute answer
    to why it exists.
    I argue that any attempt to account for the existence of something rather than nothing must ultimately bottom out in a set of brute facts; the
    universe simply is, without ultimate cause or explanation."
    Agreed, obviously, that the Universe exists and is, for all practical purposes, stable. In the long run, it is dying like all of us.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  13. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,600
    Thanks
    46,752
    Thanked 68,619 Times in 51,914 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by American Man View Post
    It's not possible to conceive of nothingness except in an abstract sense. Even empty space is still something.
    The Universe is mostly space. Emptiness. There's nothing to measure, nothing to touch. Can't breathe it, eat it or feel it. It's deadly by the fact there's nothing there; no heat, no air, no gravity. A living human tossed into it without protection would exist in form but quickly die due to the lack of anything lie sustaining

    https://www.businessinsider.com/how-...acesuit-2017-5
    What would happen if you went to space without a spacesuit? Whatever you do, don't hold your breath! The vacuum of space will pull the air from your body. So if there's air left in your lungs, they will rupture.

    Oxygen in the rest of your body will also expand. You'll balloon up to twice your normal size, but you won't explode. Your skin is elastic enough to hold you together.

    Any exposed liquid on your body will begin to vaporize. So the surfaces of your tongue and eyes will boil. Without air in your lungs, blood will stop sending oxygen to your brain.

    You'll pass out after about 15 seconds. 90 seconds after exposure, you'll die from asphyxiation. It's also very cold in space. You'll eventually freeze solid.

    Depending on where you are in space, this will take 12-26 hours, but if you're close to a star, you'll be burnt to a crisp instead. Either way, your body will remain that way for a long time.

    Gut bacteria will start to eat you from the inside out, but not for long, so you will decompose very slowly. You could be floating in space, unchanged, for millions of years. Who knows, maybe an advanced alien race will discover you!
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  14. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by American Man View Post
    It's not possible to conceive of nothingness except in an abstract sense. Even empty space is still something.
    Nothingness is not just the absence of things in space. Where is space?

  15. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dutch Uncle View Post
    Agreed, obviously, that the Universe exists and is, for all practical purposes, stable. In the long run, it is dying like all of us.
    If the universe started out as big bang and billions of years later there is our galaxy and life--how is that stable?

  16. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,600
    Thanks
    46,752
    Thanked 68,619 Times in 51,914 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    If the universe started out as big bang and billions of years later there is our galaxy and life--how is that stable?
    Unfolding in a predictable way = stable.

    Current theories show the Universe is both expanding and accelerating in that expansion. If this is a true perception, then the Universe will die of heat death in about 22 Billion years. That's stable.

    Do you believe the Universe is truly random or does it only appear to be random because there are so many variables?

    Besides the fruitcakes and assorted nuts on JPP, who here really believes the Earth could suddenly spin off from the Sun or that the Sun would nova? The laws of physics are stable. Unchanging.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  17. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,148
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by American Man View Post
    It's not possible to conceive of nothingness except in an abstract sense. Even empty space is still something.
    You would have to prove it is logically impossible for nothingness to be a possible state of affairs.

Similar Threads

  1. Little hands strikes again?? E. Jean Carroll
    By Bill in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-25-2019, 11:07 PM
  2. Pete Carroll
    By cawacko in forum Sports, Hobbies & Pictures
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 02-10-2014, 06:36 AM
  3. Pete Carroll Baby!
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-08-2011, 07:33 PM
  4. Please God Don't Let Carroll Leave
    By cawacko in forum Sports, Hobbies & Pictures
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 01-12-2010, 08:11 PM
  5. Hitler Defends Pete Carroll
    By cawacko in forum Sports, Hobbies & Pictures
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-08-2009, 01:06 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •