Members banned from this thread: BRUTALITOPS, Minister of Truth, The Anonymous, cancel2 2022, PostmodernProphet, Legion, Truth Detector, Niche Political Commentor, Superfreak, volsrock, Yurt, Earl, Lord Yurt, OG Yurt and Yakuda


Page 2 of 29 FirstFirst 12345612 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 433

Thread: The God Equation

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,152
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    I'm at Peace with NOT being able to prove there is or is not a 'God/Gods'.

    We are able to 'prove' to ourselves that Evolution is real. That we all came from single-cell organisms millions of years ago.
    But ... we are UNABLE to create 'Life'. With all our Computers and Technology, we are unable to create the simplest Life Form.

    Soooo ... anything is possible.
    Like the Scientist once said "If we find out the Seven Dwarfs are running the Universe, we'll let you know".
    OK. Sounds good to me, I've got other stuff to do.
    I did not ask about your psychological state. Like I said, agnostics merely assert without proof.

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    I did not ask about your psychological state. Like I said, agnostics merely assert without proof.
    You seem to be unable to understand the definition of 'Agnostic'.

    Are YOU able to 'PROVE' there is/is not 'God/Gods'?

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,783
    Thanks
    35,467
    Thanked 50,284 Times in 27,093 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Cy: "The ability to prove is different from the ability to know."
    Jack: If you can 'prove' it, then you are able to 'know' it.

    Cy: "Outside of the creation science nutjobs, most theologians, Bishops, and intelligent laity realize that God cannot be proven through reason or scientific experimentation. But they still believe."
    Jack: Yeah. That's called 'Belief'. I can 'believe' the Moon is made out of green cheese, doesn't mean it is.
    So we agree that the conclusion that God can neither be proven or disproven applies not only to agnostics, but also to intelligent religious people.

    Proof itself is a tricky word because virtually all the knowledge we have is based on proofs which are provisional in nature.

    The ones that worry me are the Creation Science Museum nutjobs, who seem to genuinely believe that the scientific method can somehow be used to validate the historicity of the stories in the Torah.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    evince (09-15-2021), Jack (09-15-2021)

  5. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,152
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    You seem to be unable to understand the definition of 'Agnostic'.

    Are YOU able to 'PROVE' there is/is not 'God/Gods'?
    Are you able to prove it is undecidable?

  6. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    So we agree that the conclusion that God can neither be proven or disproven applies not only to agnostics, but also to intelligent religious people.

    Proof itself is a tricky word because virtually all the knowledge we have is based on proofs which are provisional in nature.

    The ones that worry me are the Creation Science Museum nutjobs, who seem to genuinely believe that the scientific method can somehow be used to validate the historicity of the stories in the Torah.

    Cy: "So we agree that the conclusion that God can neither be proven or disproven applies not only to agnostics, but also to intelligent religious people."
    Jack: I know what 'Agnostic' means. I have no idea what 'intelligent religious people' believe.

    The 'Stories' in the Bible may or may not be true, but it is a good insight of the Ancient Peoples of the Middle East.
    There seems to be a Babylonian influence. The Code of Hammurabi is an example.

    "Modern scholars responded to the Code with admiration, at its perceived fairness and respect for the rule of law, and at the complexity of Old Babylonian society. There was also much discussion of its influence on the Mosaic Law. Scholars quickly identified lex talionis, the "eye for an eye" principle, as underlying the two collections. Debate among Assyriologists has since centred around several aspects of the Code: its purpose, its underlying principles, its language, and its relation to earlier and later law collections."
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_Hammurabi

    The 'Epic of Gilgamesh' is another.

    "Gilgamesh observes that Utnapishtim seems no different from himself, and asks him how he obtained his immortality. Utnapishtim explains that the gods decided to send a great flood. To save Utnapishtim the god Enki told him to build a boat. He gave him precise dimensions, and it was sealed with pitch and bitumen. His entire family went aboard together with his craftsmen and "all the animals of the field". A violent storm then arose which caused the terrified gods to retreat to the heavens. Ishtar lamented the wholesale destruction of humanity, and the other gods wept beside her. The storm lasted six days and nights, after which "all the human beings turned to clay". Utnapishtim weeps when he sees the destruction. His boat lodges on a mountain, and he releases a dove, a swallow, and a raven. When the raven fails to return, he opens the ark and frees its inhabitants. Utnapishtim offers a sacrifice to the gods, who smell the sweet savor and gather around. Ishtar vows that just as she will never forget the brilliant necklace that hangs around her neck, she will always remember this time. When Enlil arrives, angry that there are survivors, she condemns him for instigating the flood. Enki also castigates him for sending a disproportionate punishment. Enlil blesses Utnapishtim and his wife, and rewards them with eternal life. This account largely matches the flood story that concludes the Epic of Atra-Hasis.[26]"
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_of_Gilgamesh

  7. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    Are you able to prove it is undecidable?
    Anything is 'decidable'. Like, I've decided the Sun God is the True God.

  8. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,152
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Anything is 'decidable'. Like, I've decided the Sun God is the True God.
    you're an unintelligent buffoon

  9. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    you're an unintelligent buffoon
    Sorry. I've decided the Sun God is real and everyone else is wrong.

  10. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    you're an unintelligent buffoon
    Oh. And you are a Poo Poo Head!

  11. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    57,783
    Thanks
    35,467
    Thanked 50,284 Times in 27,093 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,975 Times in 2,692 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Cy: "So we agree that the conclusion that God can neither be proven or disproven applies not only to agnostics, but also to intelligent religious people."
    Jack: I know what 'Agnostic' means. I have no idea what 'intelligent religious people' believe.

    The 'Stories' in the Bible may or may not be true, but it is a good insight of the Ancient Peoples of the Middle East.
    There seems to be a Babylonian influence. The Code of Hammurabi is an example.

    "Modern scholars responded to the Code with admiration, at its perceived fairness and respect for the rule of law, and at the complexity of Old Babylonian society. There was also much discussion of its influence on the Mosaic Law. Scholars quickly identified lex talionis, the "eye for an eye" principle, as underlying the two collections. Debate among Assyriologists has since centred around several aspects of the Code: its purpose, its underlying principles, its language, and its relation to earlier and later law collections."
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_Hammurabi

    The 'Epic of Gilgamesh' is another.

    "Gilgamesh observes that Utnapishtim seems no different from himself, and asks him how he obtained his immortality. Utnapishtim explains that the gods decided to send a great flood. To save Utnapishtim the god Enki told him to build a boat. He gave him precise dimensions, and it was sealed with pitch and bitumen. His entire family went aboard together with his craftsmen and "all the animals of the field". A violent storm then arose which caused the terrified gods to retreat to the heavens. Ishtar lamented the wholesale destruction of humanity, and the other gods wept beside her. The storm lasted six days and nights, after which "all the human beings turned to clay". Utnapishtim weeps when he sees the destruction. His boat lodges on a mountain, and he releases a dove, a swallow, and a raven. When the raven fails to return, he opens the ark and frees its inhabitants. Utnapishtim offers a sacrifice to the gods, who smell the sweet savor and gather around. Ishtar vows that just as she will never forget the brilliant necklace that hangs around her neck, she will always remember this time. When Enlil arrives, angry that there are survivors, she condemns him for instigating the flood. Enki also castigates him for sending a disproportionate punishment. Enlil blesses Utnapishtim and his wife, and rewards them with eternal life. This account largely matches the flood story that concludes the Epic of Atra-Hasis.[26]"
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epic_of_Gilgamesh
    The stories in Torah are Jewish stories, not Christian.

    There appears to be some scholarly consensus that when the Jewish people were conquered by the Assyrians and the neo-Babylonians and forcibly brought to Babylon as slaves, etc. they were probably exposed to a lot of the Mesopotamian and Zoroastrian mythology, which ultimately filtered its way back into Genesis and the rest of Torah.

  12. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    The stories in Torah are Jewish stories, not Christian.

    There appears to be some scholarly consensus that when the Jewish people were conquered by the Assyrians and the neo-Babylonians and forcibly brought to Babylon as slaves, etc. they were probably exposed to a lot of the Mesopotamian and Zoroastrian mythology, which ultimately filtered its way back into Genesis and the rest of Torah.
    Yeah. Or maybe since the Code of Hammurabi and the Epic of Gilgamesh (along with Zoroaster) pre-date Judaism, maybe these and others influenced the Bible (Old and New Testament).

    "As in the Biblical story of Adam and Eve, the snake in the Epic of Gilgamesh is a symbol of trickery and deception. Near the end of his long journeys, Gilgamesh has finally acquired the secret to everlasting life (a plant that restores youth). But almost as soon as Gilgamesh has the plant, a snake steals it while he’s bathing and sneaks off with it into the water. Like in the Hebrew Bible, the serpent is a kind of “trickster figure,” and an obstacle between humanity and its prideful desire for everlasting life (which, like Gilgamesh, Adam and Eve lose after contact with a snake)."
    https://www.litcharts.com/lit/the-ep...bols/the-snake

  13. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    The stories in Torah are Jewish stories, not Christian.

    There appears to be some scholarly consensus that when the Jewish people were conquered by the Assyrians and the neo-Babylonians and forcibly brought to Babylon as slaves, etc. they were probably exposed to a lot of the Mesopotamian and Zoroastrian mythology, which ultimately filtered its way back into Genesis and the rest of Torah.
    "This wasn't the story of Noah and the ark, though, and this wasn't the book of Genesis in the Hebrew Bible (known to Christians as the Old Testament). What Smith had discovered was only one chapter in a sprawling Mesopotamian tale now known as the Epic of Gilgamesh, first written in 1,800 B.C.E., around 1,000 years before the Hebrew Bible."
    https://history.howstuffworks.com/hi.../gilgamesh.htm

  14. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    The stories in Torah are Jewish stories, not Christian.

    There appears to be some scholarly consensus that when the Jewish people were conquered by the Assyrians and the neo-Babylonians and forcibly brought to Babylon as slaves, etc. they were probably exposed to a lot of the Mesopotamian and Zoroastrian mythology, which ultimately filtered its way back into Genesis and the rest of Torah.
    "Zoroastrianism is an ancient Persian religion that may have originated as early as 4,000 years ago. Arguably the world’s first monotheistic faith, it’s one of the oldest religions still in existence. "
    https://www.history.com/topics/religion/zoroastrianism

    "Some scholars say that tenets of Zoroastrianism helped to shape the major Abrahamic religions—including Judaism, Christianity and Islam—through the influence of the Persian Empire.

    Zoroastrian concepts, including the idea of a single god, heaven, hell and a day of judgment, may have been first introduced to the Jewish community of Babylonia, where people from the Kingdom of Judea had been living in captivity for decades."

  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jack For This Post:

    Cypress (09-15-2021), evince (09-15-2021)

  16. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    My one nit pick is the boldness of calling it string theory.

    It cannot be experimentally tested at this point, so it technically does not reach the threshold of a theory.

    At this time, it is more of a creative idea supported by some elegant mathematics.

    It’s a musicians look at life


    You look at the instrument and know all the music lies within


    You just have to caress it into being

    How you touch the string and at what intervals


    I love string theory

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    Cypress (09-15-2021)

  18. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NiftyNiblick View Post
    You win a swimming race. [Not a great move, but you didn't know.]
    You're born.
    You live a life where the rewards will unlikely be adequate compensation for the travails.
    Then you die, no longer existing or destined to exist again.

    One can either be burning with desire to understand all of this,
    or at the opposite extreme, one might be glad to get it over with.

    I think that the very smartest among us could possibly be the ones who train their thoughts on more fun subjects.
    Or not. What the fuck do I know?
    I'm going with random confluence and then thinking about food and golf.


    A wise man once said “fuck it, fight it……it’s all the same”


    Translation: No matter what your reaction to something is you still have to deal with it as it came to you

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-02-2016, 07:17 PM
  2. Media misses half the equation.
    By Jarod in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 05-02-2008, 11:55 AM
  3. An excellent equation
    By TheHighbrow in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 07-04-2007, 10:04 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •