Originally Posted by
Flash
It didn't change the Constitution. The 9th, 1st, 3rd, 4th, and 5th amendments are parts of the document.
Do you not believe one of the rights retained by the people in the 9th amendment includes a right to privacy? I'm surprised you would accept such a coercive government that it could invade our privacy.
The Court did create a "right to privacy" that does not exist in the Constitution in the Griswold ruling. But, in answering your question, the Court also implied that if science ever determined that life begins at conception, not birth, or at "quickening", then the ruling of Roe would be invalid. Science has long proven that life, growth of cells, begins at conception. So, since it has been proven that life has occurred, what is the exception to be now for killing that unborn life? Then too, where is the "right to privacy" found in any of the Amendments you cite?
"2Timothy 3 "But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away"
Bookmarks