Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 30

Thread: SCOTUS thumps 'tards again. You'll take your vaccine and like it! We MANDATE YOU, Ha!

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default SCOTUS thumps 'tards again. You'll take your vaccine and like it! We MANDATE YOU, Ha!



    Barrett rejected the students' emergency request without offering any explanation and without referring the matter to the full court for review. The decision marks an early test of vaccine mandates during a period of surging infections and hospitalizations caused by the Delta variant of the coronavirus.

    Eight students sued in June, contending the mandate violates their right to "bodily integrity" and due process under the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment.

    In a legal filing, they told the justices the university "is treating its students as children who cannot be trusted to make mature decisions." Lower courts had rejected the students' request for an injunction while litigation continues.

    Beginning this fall, the university requires that students be vaccinated unless they qualify for a religious or medical exemption. Those granted exceptions would be required to wear face masks and be tested twice weekly.

    COVID-19 vaccines have become a political flashpoint in the United States as the highly contagious Delta variant has slammed states with lower vaccination rates.

    Hundreds of colleges and universities have mandated the COVID-19 vaccine, as have some private employers. The students' case presents one of the first challenges to the legality of these mandates.

    In July, U.S. District Court Judge Damon Leichty in South Bend, Indiana, sided with the school, finding the policy "isn't forced vaccination." On Aug. 2 the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also rebuffed the students, noting that vaccine requirements are common

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    evince (08-12-2021), Whythink (08-12-2021)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,665
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,624 Times in 21,487 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post


    Barrett rejected the students' emergency request without offering any explanation and without referring the matter to the full court for review. The decision marks an early test of vaccine mandates during a period of surging infections and hospitalizations caused by the Delta variant of the coronavirus.

    Eight students sued in June, contending the mandate violates their right to "bodily integrity" and due process under the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment.

    In a legal filing, they told the justices the university "is treating its students as children who cannot be trusted to make mature decisions." Lower courts had rejected the students' request for an injunction while litigation continues.

    Beginning this fall, the university requires that students be vaccinated unless they qualify for a religious or medical exemption. Those granted exceptions would be required to wear face masks and be tested twice weekly.

    COVID-19 vaccines have become a political flashpoint in the United States as the highly contagious Delta variant has slammed states with lower vaccination rates.

    Hundreds of colleges and universities have mandated the COVID-19 vaccine, as have some private employers. The students' case presents one of the first challenges to the legality of these mandates.

    In July, U.S. District Court Judge Damon Leichty in South Bend, Indiana, sided with the school, finding the policy "isn't forced vaccination." On Aug. 2 the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also rebuffed the students, noting that vaccine requirements are common
    This Barrett might be a reasonable judge.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    evince (08-12-2021)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    We can jab you a little now....or bigly later


    image-281.jpg

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    evince (08-12-2021)

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Apparently both "lawyers" on here are not capable of reading that applied to colleges. Not the rest of the country. And is not the last word in this. You poor dumb fake fucks.

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Just take online courses. Problem solved.

  10. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    She may actually care about the American people
    The judiciary, top to bottom, is the coequal branch most insulated from political pressures.
    Therefore they have more of a penchant to actually do the right thing. Of course advancement
    requires politics, but still, less so than the other branches.

    So when the right sees their conservative judiciary, so removed from political pressures, not doing what they want so often, you'd think
    they might deduce that they are WAY THE FUCK OFF THE RESERVATION in moral terms.

    I guess they are that dumb or don't care.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    evince (08-12-2021)

  12. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Apparently both "lawyers" on here are not capable of reading that applied to colleges. Not the rest of the country. And is not the last word in this. You poor dumb fake fucks.
    Yeap

    They can insist on masking at public colleges

  13. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Just take online courses. Problem solved.
    Good point

  14. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    93,665
    Thanks
    9,767
    Thanked 33,624 Times in 21,487 Posts
    Groans
    290
    Groaned 5,632 Times in 5,140 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    The judiciary, top to bottom, is the coequal branch most insulated from political pressures.
    Therefore they have more of a penchant to actually do the right thing. Of course advancement
    requires politics, but still, less so than the other branches.

    So when the right judiciary, removed from political pressures sees conservatives not doing what they want so often, you'd think
    they might eventually see that they are WAY THE FUCK OFF THE RESERVATION in moral terms.

    I guess they are that dumb or don't care.
    That’s the beauty of a lifetime appointment.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Jarod For This Post:

    evince (08-12-2021)

  16. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    The judiciary, top to bottom, is the coequal branch most insulated from political pressures.
    Therefore they have more of a penchant to actually do the right thing. Of course advancement
    requires politics, but still, less so than the other branches.

    So when the right sees their conservative judiciary, so removed from political pressures, not doing what they want so often, you'd think
    they might deduce that they are WAY THE FUCK OFF THE RESERVATION in moral terms.

    I guess they are that dumb or don't care.


    Russo bot holes


    Let’s not forget the FBI said it’s being done folks


    Putin got a great return on that practice


    You can bet he tripled down on the plan

  17. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    86,919
    Thanks
    35,051
    Thanked 21,761 Times in 17,091 Posts
    Groans
    985
    Groaned 2,342 Times in 2,261 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
    Good point
    I love OpenCourseWare.

    There are plenty of courses that you can pay and earn degrees online. My friend did that.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to AProudLefty For This Post:

    evince (08-12-2021)

  19. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    Yeap

    They can insist on masking at public colleges
    What makes that IDIOT sailor think I'm not aware of exactly what the court held.
    Fucking moron.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    evince (08-12-2021)

  21. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  22. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    40,213
    Thanks
    14,475
    Thanked 23,679 Times in 16,485 Posts
    Groans
    23
    Groaned 585 Times in 561 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    I love OpenCourseWare.

    There are plenty of courses that you can pay and earn degrees online. My friend did that.
    One really does not learn shit on campuses today anyway. That will be the future.

Similar Threads

  1. Very lengthy list of SCOTUS decisions overturned by later SCOTUS
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-11-2018, 07:24 PM
  2. So thumps base thinks he and the gop are winning?
    By Guno צְבִי in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-01-2018, 07:56 PM
  3. Will the 1% abandon the Tea-tards?
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-27-2011, 07:13 PM
  4. Tea-tards get it all twisted
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-07-2011, 11:50 AM
  5. More Email from the 'tards at the RNC
    By Adam Weinberg in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-27-2007, 08:18 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •