Science magazine blows the whistle on climate model failure

[cancel2 2022]

So no answer? It's just them blowing hot air? That's what I thought.

All this is about is adjusting the models to forecast more accurately.

That's what science does.

Man you're truly moronic, you just don't have a clue.

[cancel2 2022]

Ice cores?

Ice is not a rock!

[AProudLefty]

Man you're truly moronic, you just don't have a clue.

No clue about what? The original article is about correcting the climate change model.

Of course there are errors in models. That is nothing new.

[AProudLefty]

Ice is not a rock!

Did he say that?

[Hawkeye10]

Ice is not a rock!

Given some of the definitions of geology that are out there the composition of sheets of ice might qualify.

[AProudLefty]

Given some of the definitions of geology that are out there the composition of sheets of ice might qualify.

He doesn't understand that.

[cancel2 2022]

No clue about what? The original article is about correcting the climate change model.

Of course there are errors in models. That is nothing new.

I'm sorry but you are so moronic it's painful. Go and do some basic research ffs. Read up on CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate models, why Gavin Schmidt is so alarmed and what Representative Concentration Pathways are, there's a good boy.

[AProudLefty]

I'm sorry but you so moronic it's painful. Go and do some basic research ffs. Read up on CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate models

Those models are mentioned in the very article that was referred to by the article you linked.

[Hawkeye10]

He doesn't understand that.

I had the smarts to deploy Google.

[AProudLefty]

Stop asking stupid questions! Do you even know who Gavin Schmidt is or what CMIP 6 models are?

Oh look!!!!! The original article mentioned them!!!

Ahead of each major IPCC report, the world’s climate modeling centers run a set of scenarios for the future, calculating how different global emissions paths will alter the climate. These raw results, compiled in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), then feed directly into the IPCC report. The results live on as other scientists use them to assess the impacts of climate change, insurance companies and financial institutions forecast effects on economies and infrastructure, and economists calculate the true cost of carbon emissions, says Jean-François Lamarque, a lead climate modeler at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and CMIP’s new director. “This is not an ivory tower type of exercise.”

GASP!!!! TAKE A LOOK AT THIS!!!!


But as climate scientists face this alarming reality, the climate models that help them project the future have grown a little too alarmist. Many of the world’s leading models are now projecting warming rates that most scientists, including the modelmakers themselves, believe are implausibly fast. In advance of the U.N. report, scientists have scrambled to understand what went wrong and how to turn the models, which in other respects are more powerful and trustworthy than their predecessors, into useful guidance for policymakers. “It’s become clear over the last year or so that we can’t avoid this,” says Gavin Schmidt, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

Do you honestly think you know better than them? What are your credentials?

[AProudLefty]

Why does thus guy keep giving me groans? Why cannot he debate with me like a normal guy?

[cancel2 2022]

I had the smarts to deploy Google.

I have no desire to discuss the difference between glaciology and geology. It's peripheral to the main topic anyway, stick to that!

[Hawkeye10]

I have no desire to discuss the difference between glaciology and geology. It's peripheral to the main topic anyway, stick to that!

I dont work for you Pal.

[cancel2 2022]

I dont work for you Pal.

Lol

[Hawkeye10]

Lol

Respect my sovereignty!

Any fan of Douglas Murray ( who has been on FIRE! lately) should have no problem with this.