Members banned from this thread: archives, Jade Dragon, Charoite and Trumpet |
cancel2 2022 (07-31-2021)
cancel2 2022 (07-31-2021)
AProudLefty (07-31-2021), moon (08-01-2021)
cancel2 2022 (07-31-2021)
moon (08-01-2021)
Last edited by cancel2 2022; 07-31-2021 at 05:34 PM.
cancel2 2022 (07-31-2021)
Oh look!!!!! The original article mentioned them!!!
Ahead of each major IPCC report, the world’s climate modeling centers run a set of scenarios for the future, calculating how different global emissions paths will alter the climate. These raw results, compiled in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), then feed directly into the IPCC report. The results live on as other scientists use them to assess the impacts of climate change, insurance companies and financial institutions forecast effects on economies and infrastructure, and economists calculate the true cost of carbon emissions, says Jean-François Lamarque, a lead climate modeler at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and CMIP’s new director. “This is not an ivory tower type of exercise.”
GASP!!!! TAKE A LOOK AT THIS!!!!
But as climate scientists face this alarming reality, the climate models that help them project the future have grown a little too alarmist. Many of the world’s leading models are now projecting warming rates that most scientists, including the modelmakers themselves, believe are implausibly fast. In advance of the U.N. report, scientists have scrambled to understand what went wrong and how to turn the models, which in other respects are more powerful and trustworthy than their predecessors, into useful guidance for policymakers. “It’s become clear over the last year or so that we can’t avoid this,” says Gavin Schmidt, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
Do you honestly think you know better than them? What are your credentials?
cancel2 2022 (07-31-2021)
Why does thus guy keep giving me groans? Why cannot he debate with me like a normal guy?
cancel2 2022 (07-31-2021)
Bookmarks