If there was no fraud what's the problem?

[katzgar]

Idiot democrats seem to be worried. Thae enough is reason to proceed.

nope, a bunch of trump supporters on mobility scooters arent really a threat.

[T. A. Gardner]

Hello T. A. Gardner,



Polling for every election Trump was ever in showed he would lose the popular vote and that is exactly what happened.

Just because he won the presidency in the EC doesn't mean he 'won in a landslide,' or that the polling was incorrect, or that there was fraud.

He is quite simply the world's worst loser ever.

Polling said in 2016 the Hildabeast would win in a landslide. Trump won. Just because the predictions match the outcome doesn't mean the predictions were correct by other than chance.

[PoliTalker]

Hello T. A. Gardner,

Polling said in 2016 the Hildabeast would win in a landslide. Trump won. Just because the predictions match the outcome doesn't mean the predictions were correct by other than chance.

None of the 2016 polling referred to HRC by that derogatory term.

The polling in 2016 indicated no landslide for Hillary. It indicated a slight lead, which was diminishing as election day grew closer.

The results were very close to what the polls indicated. While Hillary won the popular vote by a margin by 3 million, (almost precisely matching the polls) the EC handed the narrow victory to her opponent.

Too bad for America.

Trump lost the popular vote in 2016, and he lost it by a larger margin in 2020.