Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 109

Thread: WSJ editorial board slams Fauci, media and calls for congressional investigation

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default WSJ editorial board slams Fauci, media and calls for congressional investigation

    The U.S. knows something about the research conducted at the WIV, because American taxpayer dollars helped fund it. This was the crux of last week’s dispute between Sen. Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci, who had cast doubt on the lab-leak hypothesis in the past. In their latest bout, the Kentucky Senator accused Dr. Fauci of lying to Congress, a federal crime, when he said this year that the National Institutes of Health had never funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan. The exchange descended into shouting.

    The reality is complicated. The NIH gave almost $600,000 to the WIV through a nonprofit over several years to study bat coronaviruses. Mr. Paul cited a 2017 paper from WIV researchers that included experiments combining parts of viruses to study how to better infect human cells. But Dr. Fauci said the project was “judged by qualified staff up and down the chain as not being gain-of-function.”

    This might be technically true, as a 2014 federal government definition describes such research as that which “increase the ability of infectious agents to cause disease by enhancing its pathogenicity or by increasing its transmissibility.” But some scientists think the government definition is too limited and can allow de facto gain-of-function research to bypass safety protocols. Rutgers molecular biologist Richard Ebright says the NIH-funded work “was—unequivocally—gain-of-function research.”

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/anthony...bshare_twitter
    ______________

    Rand Paul was right, of course. Engineering a virus to where it is able to infect human cells IS gain of function research.

    But look at the Fauci definition of GOF research: “increase the ability of infectious agents to cause disease by enhancing its pathogenicity or by increasing its transmissibility.

    If your brain has a logical bent to it, you might recognize that as a distinction without a difference and at least one [uncompromised] and respected molecular biologist would agree with you. If you add a widget to a mouse trap so that it traps chickens, the mouse trap has *gained function*.

    In principle, the definition of GOF is that ridiculously straightforward. Similarly, when virologists add a spike protein that enables a non-transmissible virus to enter human cells—and become at least theoretically transmissible, THAT is GOF research.

    Clearly, the government definition of GOF was ‘engineered’ to provide cover [in the form of plausible deniability] for Fauci and some others who have been collaborating with Chinese virologists on *gain of function research* for years. And they did this in spite of an Obama era ban on GOF research. Did Dr. Baric or other virologists teach Chinese virologists any lab techniques? Did they share gene splicing technology with them?

    No wonder they wanted to bury the lab origin theory. This stinks.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  2. The Following User Groans At Darth Omar For This Awful Post:

    Hoosier Daddy (07-26-2021)

  3. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    dukkha (07-26-2021), ExpressLane (07-26-2021), Grumpy (07-27-2021)

  4. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,889
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Wow, right wing newspaper does not like Democrats!

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Good luck with that.

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    Wow, right wing newspaper does not like Democrats!
    This is the WSJ calling for a congressional investigation. That might get some attention.

    Btw, what does it have to do with democrats?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    ExpressLane (07-26-2021), Grumpy (07-27-2021)

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Good luck with that.
    Right lol?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,889
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    This is the WSJ calling for a congressional investigation. That might get some attention.

    Btw, what does it have to do with democrats?
    Nothing, you are right. Just because GOP has been attacking Fauci is irrelevant.

  10. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    Nothing, you are right. Just because GOP has been attacking Fauci is irrelevant.
    Fauci is some sort of unapproachable demi-god?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    ExpressLane (07-26-2021)

  12. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,889
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Fauci is some sort of unapproachable demi-god?
    No. Just freaking obvious.

  13. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Btw, what does it have to do with democrats?


    Uh, you hate them and it motivates every keystroke you have ever made maybe?

  14. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    22,864
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 15,405 Times in 9,440 Posts
    Groans
    101
    Groaned 1,894 Times in 1,783 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    FDS.

  15. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Fauci is some sort of unapproachable demi-god?

    Considering present company, yes.

  16. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    The U.S. knows something about the research conducted at the WIV, because American taxpayer dollars helped fund it. This was the crux of last week’s dispute between Sen. Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci, who had cast doubt on the lab-leak hypothesis in the past. In their latest bout, the Kentucky Senator accused Dr. Fauci of lying to Congress, a federal crime, when he said this year that the National Institutes of Health had never funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan. The exchange descended into shouting.

    The reality is complicated. The NIH gave almost $600,000 to the WIV through a nonprofit over several years to study bat coronaviruses. Mr. Paul cited a 2017 paper from WIV researchers that included experiments combining parts of viruses to study how to better infect human cells. But Dr. Fauci said the project was “judged by qualified staff up and down the chain as not being gain-of-function.”

    This might be technically true, as a 2014 federal government definition describes such research as that which “increase the ability of infectious agents to cause disease by enhancing its pathogenicity or by increasing its transmissibility.” But some scientists think the government definition is too limited and can allow de facto gain-of-function research to bypass safety protocols. Rutgers molecular biologist Richard Ebright says the NIH-funded work “was—unequivocally—gain-of-function research.”

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/anthony...bshare_twitter
    ______________

    Rand Paul was right, of course. Engineering a virus to where it is able to infect human cells IS gain of function research.

    But look at the Fauci definition of GOF research: “increase the ability of infectious agents to cause disease by enhancing its pathogenicity or by increasing its transmissibility.

    If your brain has a logical bent to it, you might recognize that as a distinction without a difference and at least one [uncompromised] and respected molecular biologist would agree with you. If you add a widget to a mouse trap so that it traps chickens, the mouse trap has *gained function*.

    In principle, the definition of GOF is that ridiculously straightforward. Similarly, when virologists add a spike protein that enables a non-transmissible virus to enter human cells—and become at least theoretically transmissible, THAT is GOF research.

    Clearly, the government definition of GOF was ‘engineered’ to provide cover [in the form of plausible deniability] for Fauci and some others who have been collaborating with Chinese virologists on *gain of function research* for years. And they did this in spite of an Obama era ban on GOF research. Did Dr. Baric or other virologists teach Chinese virologists any lab techniques? Did they share gene splicing technology with them?

    No wonder they wanted to bury the lab origin theory. This stinks.
    so who wrote the regs? it's obviously GOF, it's obviously written as you correct state to give plausible deniability

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    ExpressLane (07-26-2021)

  18. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    This is the WSJ calling for a congressional investigation. That might get some attention.
    lol.. no.
    All Pelosi wants to investigate is 1/6 by her stacked committee narrative (guess what are going to be the conclusions?)
    without ANY looking at why the Capitol had no reserve security that day - despite numerous warning
    ~~

    But stuff like a PANDEMIC funded by the NIH in cooperation with the CCP??
    who cares about such niceties?

  19. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    so who wrote the regs? it's obviously GOF, it's obviously written as you correct state to give plausible deniability
    It was probably written shortly after the prohibition was put in under Obama. I don’t know why else they would be motivated to define it so narrowly. But this is the WSJ and not Revolver News. It should get the attention of Congress and/or *force* the media to report on it instead of defending Fauci.

    Maybe.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  20. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Thought experiment Darth.

    If you knew (I mean metaphysical certitude-God in your ear knowledge) that attending college would make people more intelligent, wealthy and more liberal, would you oppose funding it?

    I think your party needs people to be stupid and has sourced them and is nearing tap out levels. The (gold rush) 49rs are named that for a reason. It did not go on for decades.
    When will you people get right with the world?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 82
    Last Post: 04-30-2020, 07:35 AM
  2. Boston Globe Editorial Board: Trump 'Has Blood On His Hands'
    By Cinnabar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-02-2020, 12:46 PM
  3. NYT editorial board member: 'Kill More Men,' 'F*ck The Police'.
    By volsrock in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-04-2018, 09:45 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-06-2017, 06:52 AM
  5. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-21-2017, 09:44 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •