Members banned from this thread: BRUTALITOPS, Minister of Truth, The Anonymous, cancel2 2022, PostmodernProphet, Legion, Truth Detector, Niche Political Commentor, Superfreak, volsrock, Yurt, Lord Yurt, OG Yurt, Yakuda and jakemax


Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 53 of 53

Thread: Bertrand Russell vs. John-Paul Sartre

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,786
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post

    For two thousand years, western philosophers have been generally interested in religion and religious thinking, whether positive or negative.
    Almost always negative. Often contemptuous.

  2. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,786
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Goethe was contemptuous of religion: "If a man has neither art nor science, let him have religion."

  3. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,172
    Thanks
    35,729
    Thanked 50,676 Times in 27,321 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    Since Cypress is going to make personal attacks on me, as usual, let me say this.

    Very few philosophers in any era were religious and cared about religion. Cypress lies about this because he is a religious fundamentalist.
    I have made no personal attacks on you. You will be hard pressed to identify anything in this thread a reasonable person would consider a personal attack on you.

  4. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,786
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    I have made no personal attacks on you. You will be hard pressed to identify anything in this thread a reasonable person would consider a personal attack on you.
    uh huh. And most people think I am a genius.....

  5. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,172
    Thanks
    35,729
    Thanked 50,676 Times in 27,321 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    And historians have been interested in genocide. So what.
    Okay, so now you agree with me that western philosophical history has widely been interested in, cared about, concerned with (take your pick) religion and religious thinking. Obviously because it is a substantial part of the human experience.

    That is what I said hours ago.

    Carry on.

  6. #51 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,786
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Okay, so now you agree with me that western philosophical history has widely been interested in, cared about, concerned with (take your pick) religion and religious thinking. Obviously because it is a substantial part of the human experience.

    That is what I said hours ago.

    Carry on.

    You're really dumb.

    You are a perfect example that religion makes people stupid.

  7. #52 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,172
    Thanks
    35,729
    Thanked 50,676 Times in 27,321 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    You're really dumb.

    You are a perfect example that religion makes people stupid.
    You can only expect me to respond to words you actually write.

    You should have said most prominent modern era philosophers are skeptical, or even hostile to religion.

    I would not have disagreed with that.

    If you want to revise what you wrote, let me know.

    You wrote that the history of philosophy doesn't care about, not interested in religion.

    That is categorically incorrect.

  8. #53 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,172
    Thanks
    35,729
    Thanked 50,676 Times in 27,321 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default The Russell-Sarte Tribunal

    Having a public forum to excoriate the morality of the U.S. war in Vietnam is fine. USA should be held to a higher standard. But these kangaroo courts would have more credibility if they took the crimes against humanity of the Soviet and Maoist regimes more seriously.

    The Russell-Sarte Tribunal

    The Russell Tribunal, also known as the International War Crimes Tribunal, Russell-Sartre Tribunal, or Stockholm Tribunal, was a private People's Tribunal organised in 1966 by Bertrand Russell, British philosopher and Nobel Prize winner, and hosted by French philosopher and writer Jean-Paul Sartre...The tribunal investigated and evaluated American foreign policy and military intervention in Vietnam


    Wikipedia

Similar Threads

  1. 1975 - Confirmation of Justice John Paul Stevens took 19 DAYS!!!
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-20-2020, 11:49 PM
  2. Justice John Paul Stevens
    By katzgar in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-05-2018, 06:59 AM
  3. Bertrand Russell - Message to Future Generations
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 10-22-2017, 06:22 AM
  4. John Stewart Rips Rand Paul
    By Mott the Hoople in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-13-2013, 11:47 AM
  5. Rand Paul Filibusters John Brennan Nomination
    By Heyzobo4u in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-06-2013, 03:58 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •