Notice, the slavish Democrat can only comprehend something being accurate or true if some perceived authority tells them it is okay to think that thought, while the conservative does not need anyone else's permission to think for themselves and can demonstrate on their own whose assertions are accurate and honest versus otherwise.
kill children import hostile immigrants.jpg
Maddow's target audience is 25-45 year old women who don't follow politics. Her opening segment is horribly redundant, and is always much better when someone sits in for her. For those of us who just want facts, sans affect, she's unbearable.
As an interviewer, she's one of the best. She's the polar opposite of Chis Matthews, who used to use guests as props to be asked questions only to be interrupted the moment they attempted to answer.
Maddow asks pertinent questions, and allows her guests the ability to articulate their response without interruption. She begins by asking what she got wrong, if anything, in the introduction.
I typically don't watch due to the aforementioned redundancy. As far as facts, any claims of overt lying in nonsense. She has run with breaking stories, only to offer retractions immediately if developments bear out a different set of facts.
Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.
It's a good thing too, with how much she gets wrong and lies about.
And the answer is always every part of everything.
Nope, she absolutely DOES flat-out lie (in addition to her always hilariously wrong predictions). This whole thread is BASED on a lawsuit over her intentionally lying to smear OANN News as being paid by Russia.
Maddow Tells Viewers Taxes Going Up (80 Percent Of Taxpayers Actually Get A Tax Cut)
Rachel Maddow’s 17 Most Audacious and Paranoid Russia Hoax Lies
Lies, Damned Lies, & Rachel Maddow
Relax or if you can't relax shove your personal insults up your ass. If you "have news and OPINIONS at the same time", by definition you're not a news show. A new shows has news without opinions. Even Maddow would say her show isn't a "news" show and I imagine that is what her lawyers argued though not in the crass terms employed by our hopeless thread starter. She's a television version of a newspaper columnist. MSNBC does not have even one straight news program. It does have the most balanced and intelligent discussion format, better than CNN's in my opinion and a world better than FOX's.
Last edited by martin; 06-24-2021 at 07:38 AM.
"Give pearls away and rubies but keep your fancy free."
artichoke (06-24-2021)
In theory, but NEVER in practice.
Well, yeah. They tried to put a positive spin on saying she shouldn't be held accountable for outright slander as a fake news "journalist," but everyone got what was being admitted to.
Yes, you can hear a nutjob racist debate a Marxist and a moderate Democrat. You know, all sides of the story covered.
What a crack-smoker.
you are wrong, dumbass. name any well known newscaster who DID NOT OPINE FROM TIME TO TIME, along with the straight news reporting. stupid fuck. hell, you could read the news if the words were not too tough....from edward r. murrow to cronkite to rather to maddow, incredibly informed dedicated journalists who also commented on the news when they felt the need. of course maddow is way more opinionated on air than the other guys, cable news has changed that aspect, but SHE STILL DOES NOT LIE LIKE THE STUPID FUCK FOX TALKING HEADS AND THAT WAS THE POINT, BOY.
Wow, alert the media. LOL, what a dumb fucking thread. Of course it isn't news. No one ever claimed it was.
I had no idea this would turn into this.
watch world burn.jpg
Bookmarks