The American dream is over

[Legion]

Anyone who can defend 89 percent turnout in Wisconsin, or 138,000 votes magically appearing in Biden’s column when none appeared for President Trump in Michigan, or Republican observers being barred from the room when votes were counted in Pennsylvania, Michigan, or Nevada, or mail-in ballots continuing to be accepted after deadlines set by state legislatures in multiple states, without recognizing the corruption of the process inherent in these tactics, is either brazenly dishonest or a drooling simpleton.

You would see such tactics and you would rub your eyes in disbelief. How can Americans sanction such Third World behavior? you ask.

Power.

That’s why.

A Biden regime makes the man in the White House beholden to these people who invested so much in so manifestly unfit a candidate, and it puts an end to the time of an effort that would devolve that power from the elites to the middle class.

For that, anything is justified.

What’s more, though, is it’s a free shot.

Nobody paid a price for rigging the 1960 election.

Nobody paid a price for attempting to steal the 2000 election.

Nobody has paid for the Russia hoax, for the Clinton Foundation scam or Hillary’s emails, or for what’s on Hunter Biden’s laptop.

We’re talking about some of the most monumental scandals in American history, all of which completely dwarf Watergate, and yet there have never been, and will never be, consequences.

And when there are no consequences to corruption, the corruption grows.

Does anyone expect that the malefactors of political power will suffer?

How can you?

And because of that, how can you not expect they’ll just be back in 2024 with even more brazen, aggressive tactics to "elect" someone just as odious, if not more, than Biden?

What’s worst about this is we already know how it ends.


https://spectator.org/democrats-steal-election/

[Yakuda]

Anyone who can defend 89 percent turnout in Wisconsin, or 138,000 votes magically appearing in Biden’s column when none appeared for President Trump in Michigan, or Republican observers being barred from the room when votes were counted in Pennsylvania, Michigan, or Nevada, or mail-in ballots continuing to be accepted after deadlines set by state legislatures in multiple states, without recognizing the corruption of the process inherent in these tactics, is either brazenly dishonest or a drooling simpleton.

You would see such tactics and you would rub your eyes in disbelief. How can Americans sanction such Third World behavior? you ask.

Power.

That’s why.

A Biden regime makes the man in the White House beholden to these people who invested so much in so manifestly unfit a candidate, and it puts an end to the time of an effort that would devolve that power from the elites to the middle class.

For that, anything is justified.

What’s more, though, is it’s a free shot.

Nobody paid a price for rigging the 1960 election.

Nobody paid a price for attempting to steal the 2000 election.

Nobody has paid for the Russia hoax, for the Clinton Foundation scam or Hillary’s emails, or for what’s on Hunter Biden’s laptop.

We’re talking about some of the most monumental scandals in American history, all of which completely dwarf Watergate, and yet there have never been, and will never be, consequences.

And when there are no consequences to corruption, the corruption grows.

Does anyone expect that the malefactors of political power will suffer?

How can you?

And because of that, how can you not expect they’ll just be back in 2024 with even more brazen, aggressive tactics to "elect" someone just as odious, if not more, than Biden?

What’s worst about this is we already know how it ends.


https://spectator.org/democrats-steal-election/

There is no way that leftists can explain this stuff away. That's why they have been so angry with anyone who questions the results. Why would anyone who did something legitimately be so opposed to people investigating what happened? The fact is the fucking weasels stole the fucking election. Anyone with a connected brain stem can see that. Fuck Stevie Wonder can see it.

[Legion]

Have you heard about this?

While other election law changes have prompted thunderous press releases and high-profile hand-wringing, these laws have received much less attention.

In 2020, a tax-exempt charitable foundation operated by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan provided hundreds of millions of dollars for local election administration.

As a nonprofit, a 501(c)(3) under the IRS code, the foundation cannot spend money on partisan political activities.

But in 2017, Chan and Zuckerberg hired David Plouffe, who was Obama’s campaign manager in 2008, to lead what Zuckerberg described in a news release as the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative’s “policy and advocacy effort.”

In October 2019, as the presidential campaigns were heating up, Plouffe scaled back to a part-time role to make more time for other endeavors, including a book he was writing, later published in March 2020.

The title of the book? “A Citizen’s Guide to Beating Donald Trump.”

While it’s completely legal for foundation money to be spent on non-partisan voter education and get-out-the-vote efforts, in this case, the foundation’s money appears to have been targeted to one team’s voters.

Campaign spending in federal elections is limited by federal law and regulated by the Federal Election Commission.

States have similar laws that limit and regulate campaign spending.

This includes the money that campaigns spend on costly get-out-the-vote efforts aimed at turning out the voters who are likely to be on the campaign’s team, and not on the other campaign’s team.

In 2020, the Chan-Zuckerberg foundation gave $350 million to a nonprofit organization called the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which distributed it to about 2,500 jurisdictions in nearly every state.

There were tight conditions on the use of the cash. For example, in Arizona’s Coconino County, the Board of Supervisors was told in a memo that the grant from CTCL would provide “additional capacity to increase voter education efforts.”

But not everywhere.

The Associated Press reported that nine of Arizona’s fifteen counties – Apache, Coconino, Graham, La Paz, Maricopa, Navajo, Pima, Pinal and Yuma – received grants from the Center for Tech and Civic Life.

Of the six counties that received no foundation money – Cochise, Gila, Greenlee, Mohave, Santa Cruz and Yavapai – only one, lightly populated Santa Cruz, was carried by Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

The others went overwhelmingly for Donald Trump. He carried Mohave (the state’s 6th largest county) by a margin of 73.7% to 22.2% and Yavapai (4th largest) 63.4% to 32%. No Chan-Zuckerberg money was spent by CTCL to get-out-the-vote in those jurisdictions.

A study by the Foundation for Government Accountability reported that in Pennsylvania, CTCL distributed $22 million of private money for the 2020 election, and “counties won by Biden in 2020 received an average of $4.99 Zuckerbucks per registered voter".



https://www.bollyinside.com/news/keep-private-money-out-of-election-administration-daily-bulletin

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Thank God we woke up from our 4 year nightmare.

Now if only Legion could learn how to tell fact from fiction, but that is just an American dream on my part that I'm sure will never be over.

Fact - 89% of voters didn't vote in Wisconsin. Voter turnout was about 71.4% https://elections.wi.gov/elections-v...istics/turnout
Fact - When data is entered, it is entered one piece of data at a time. When Trump vote increased, Biden's vote didn't because of the way data entry works.
Fact - Disruptive persons were barred from being in the counting rooms. Republican observers were not banned. https://www.freep.com/story/news/loc...cf/6190533002/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisond...h=4028e52f6e30
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...-ballot-count/

[Legion]

Fact - 89% of voters didn't vote in Wisconsin. Voter turnout was about 71.4% https://elections.wi.gov/elections-v...istics/turnout
Fact - When data is entered, it is entered one piece of data at a time. When Trump vote increased, Biden's vote didn't because of the way data entry works.
Fact - Disruptive persons were barred from being in the counting rooms. Republican observers were not banned. https://www.freep.com/story/news/loc...cf/6190533002/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisond...h=4028e52f6e30
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...-ballot-count/

Check your "facts".

[evince]

Anyone who can defend 89 percent turnout in Wisconsin, or 138,000 votes magically appearing in Biden’s column when none appeared for President Trump in Michigan, or Republican observers being barred from the room when votes were counted in Pennsylvania, Michigan, or Nevada, or mail-in ballots continuing to be accepted after deadlines set by state legislatures in multiple states, without recognizing the corruption of the process inherent in these tactics, is either brazenly dishonest or a drooling simpleton.

You would see such tactics and you would rub your eyes in disbelief. How can Americans sanction such Third World behavior? you ask.

Power.

That’s why.

A Biden regime makes the man in the White House beholden to these people who invested so much in so manifestly unfit a candidate, and it puts an end to the time of an effort that would devolve that power from the elites to the middle class.

For that, anything is justified.

What’s more, though, is it’s a free shot.

Nobody paid a price for rigging the 1960 election.

Nobody paid a price for attempting to steal the 2000 election.

Nobody has paid for the Russia hoax, for the Clinton Foundation scam or Hillary’s emails, or for what’s on Hunter Biden’s laptop.

We’re talking about some of the most monumental scandals in American history, all of which completely dwarf Watergate, and yet there have never been, and will never be, consequences.

And when there are no consequences to corruption, the corruption grows.

Does anyone expect that the malefactors of political power will suffer?

How can you?

And because of that, how can you not expect they’ll just be back in 2024 with even more brazen, aggressive tactics to "elect" someone just as odious, if not more, than Biden?

What’s worst about this is we already know how it ends.


https://spectator.org/democrats-steal-election/

Yeap it ends with you insane cult idiots shutting the hell up and becoming trump memorabilia addicts

Then your purchases make Barron Trump wealthy

He then donates large sums to liberal causes because it turns out he didn’t inherit the sociopathic gene so strong in the family


He even sends his criminal family members gift baskets to there prison cells

[evince]

Check your "facts".

Get some facts

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Check your "facts".

I did. You should check yours.

Let's start with your claim of 89% turnout in Wisconsin. Provide a source that would confirm that.
I provided a source disputing it.

[evince]

Have you heard about this?

While other election law changes have prompted thunderous press releases and high-profile hand-wringing, these laws have received much less attention.

In 2020, a tax-exempt charitable foundation operated by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan provided hundreds of millions of dollars for local election administration.

As a nonprofit, a 501(c)(3) under the IRS code, the foundation cannot spend money on partisan political activities.

But in 2017, Chan and Zuckerberg hired David Plouffe, who was Obama’s campaign manager in 2008, to lead what Zuckerberg described in a news release as the Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative’s “policy and advocacy effort.”

In October 2019, as the presidential campaigns were heating up, Plouffe scaled back to a part-time role to make more time for other endeavors, including a book he was writing, later published in March 2020.

The title of the book? “A Citizen’s Guide to Beating Donald Trump.”

While it’s completely legal for foundation money to be spent on non-partisan voter education and get-out-the-vote efforts, in this case, the foundation’s money appears to have been targeted to one team’s voters.

Campaign spending in federal elections is limited by federal law and regulated by the Federal Election Commission.

States have similar laws that limit and regulate campaign spending.

This includes the money that campaigns spend on costly get-out-the-vote efforts aimed at turning out the voters who are likely to be on the campaign’s team, and not on the other campaign’s team.

In 2020, the Chan-Zuckerberg foundation gave $350 million to a nonprofit organization called the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which distributed it to about 2,500 jurisdictions in nearly every state.

There were tight conditions on the use of the cash. For example, in Arizona’s Coconino County, the Board of Supervisors was told in a memo that the grant from CTCL would provide “additional capacity to increase voter education efforts.”

But not everywhere.

The Associated Press reported that nine of Arizona’s fifteen counties – Apache, Coconino, Graham, La Paz, Maricopa, Navajo, Pima, Pinal and Yuma – received grants from the Center for Tech and Civic Life.

Of the six counties that received no foundation money – Cochise, Gila, Greenlee, Mohave, Santa Cruz and Yavapai – only one, lightly populated Santa Cruz, was carried by Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

The others went overwhelmingly for Donald Trump. He carried Mohave (the state’s 6th largest county) by a margin of 73.7% to 22.2% and Yavapai (4th largest) 63.4% to 32%. No Chan-Zuckerberg money was spent by CTCL to get-out-the-vote in those jurisdictions.

A study by the Foundation for Government Accountability reported that in Pennsylvania, CTCL distributed $22 million of private money for the 2020 election, and “counties won by Biden in 2020 received an average of $4.99 Zuckerbucks per registered voter".



https://www.bollyinside.com/news/keep-private-money-out-of-election-administration-daily-bulletin

BOLLYWOOD INSIDER


BEJEBUS DUDE

[evince]

There is no way that leftists can explain this stuff away. That's why they have been so angry with anyone who questions the results. Why would anyone who did something legitimately be so opposed to people investigating what happened? The fact is the fucking weasels stole the fucking election. Anyone with a connected brain stem can see that. Fuck Stevie Wonder can see it.

Then file more court cases


Every judge heaved as crap the trump filings about the election already


Dozens of cases

Even trump appointed judges

Crap is crap

Like you brain case contents

[Concart]

So leave. Bye!

[Whythink]

Anyone who can defend 89 percent turnout in Wisconsin, or 138,000 votes magically appearing in Biden’s column when none appeared for President Trump in Michigan, or Republican observers being barred from the room when votes were counted in Pennsylvania, Michigan, or Nevada, or mail-in ballots continuing to be accepted after deadlines set by state legislatures in multiple states, without recognizing the corruption of the process inherent in these tactics, is either brazenly dishonest or a drooling simpleton.

You would see such tactics and you would rub your eyes in disbelief. How can Americans sanction such Third World behavior? you ask.

Power.

That’s why.

A Biden regime makes the man in the White House beholden to these people who invested so much in so manifestly unfit a candidate, and it puts an end to the time of an effort that would devolve that power from the elites to the middle class.

For that, anything is justified.

What’s more, though, is it’s a free shot.

Nobody paid a price for rigging the 1960 election.

Nobody paid a price for attempting to steal the 2000 election.

Nobody has paid for the Russia hoax, for the Clinton Foundation scam or Hillary’s emails, or for what’s on Hunter Biden’s laptop.

We’re talking about some of the most monumental scandals in American history, all of which completely dwarf Watergate, and yet there have never been, and will never be, consequences.

And when there are no consequences to corruption, the corruption grows.

Does anyone expect that the malefactors of political power will suffer?

How can you?

And because of that, how can you not expect they’ll just be back in 2024 with even more brazen, aggressive tactics to "elect" someone just as odious, if not more, than Biden?

What’s worst about this is we already know how it ends.


https://spectator.org/democrats-steal-election/

Lol

[RB 60]

Yeap it ends with you insane cult idiots shutting the hell up and becoming trump memorabilia addicts

Then your purchases make Barron Trump wealthy

He then donates large sums to liberal causes because it turns out he didn’t inherit the sociopathic gene so strong in the family


He even sends his criminal family members gift baskets to there prison cells

[Legion]

Desh is a typing chimp.

[Legion]

I did.

Did you?