Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 44 of 44

Thread: What is philosophy? Philosophy is an applied science.

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    11,740
    Thanks
    2,319
    Thanked 2,327 Times in 1,987 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 184 Times in 174 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    Where did Plato talk about "true science?"
    The Republic, I can't remember which chapter. Plato shows why man-made laws should come from reason instead of religion. Plato believes reason is the only/best science. It starts to make sense once you understand precognition, the ability to do the calculations in your mind to make an educated guess. Plato didn't realize that engineers and architects also see things in their mind before they build it.

  2. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,212
    Thanks
    35,762
    Thanked 50,717 Times in 27,347 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by goat View Post
    The translation of Plato used the words 'true science'. Plato's disdain for architecture and engineering gave me a negative view of Plato until I got to The Apology. Confronting human nature is an art in itself. Betrayal became the utmost of sins with an honest look at human behavior. A dialogue written some 2400 years ago.
    "Science" is derived from a Latin word, and has only been used since the 18th century to represent the kind of experimental inductive logic Francis Bacon advocated at the dawn of the scientific age.

    Plato did not speak Latin and did not use the word science.

    It is obviously an artifact of bad translation, and the only reason I nitpick it is because my cousin is a professional interpreter and translator.

    The Greeks were not doing experimental science.

    Plato would written in lexicon appropriate for ancient Greece, aka philosophia and episteme, or other Greek analogs for knowlege and natural philosophy.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    evince (06-22-2021)

  4. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,905
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post

    The Greeks were not doing experimental science.

    Aristotle was. Parts of Animals clearly documents dissecting animals.

  5. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,212
    Thanks
    35,762
    Thanked 50,717 Times in 27,347 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    Aristotle was. Parts of Animals clearly documents dissecting animals.
    That's true. He was doing a kind of investigation of the natural world that Plato had no interest in.

    But also a lot of Aristotle's speculations about the natural world was based on deductive reasoning, rather than experimental induction.

    That is how Galileo disproved Aristotelian physics -- Galileo actually did experiments proving the mechanics of Aristotle wrong

  6. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,527
    Thanks
    72,464
    Thanked 35,774 Times in 27,248 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Love of wisdom


    I love that


    To me philosophy is a search for truth and reality


    You apply all known facts and then look for the impact on humans of our current knowledge and try to understand and convey that impact on what’s best for mankind and the physical world that is our home


    It requires a love of mankind and knowledge applied to create a more perfect world

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    Cypress (06-22-2021)

  8. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,905
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    That's true. He was doing a kind of investigation of the natural world that Plato had no interest in.

    But also a lot of Aristotle's speculations about the natural world was based on deductive reasoning, rather than experimental induction.

    That is how Galileo disproved Aristotelian physics -- Galileo actually did experiments proving the mechanics of Aristotle wrong

    Aristotle did not consider math to be the proper method of describing nature.

  9. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,527
    Thanks
    72,464
    Thanked 35,774 Times in 27,248 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Artists were known to dissect animals and even corpses


    So they could represent what they truely look like with that knowledge


    Knowing where bone and muscles actually were and how they connected


    Even the thickness of skin could help them represent the human form more accurately

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to evince For This Post:

    Cypress (06-22-2021)

  11. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,212
    Thanks
    35,762
    Thanked 50,717 Times in 27,347 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    Love of wisdom


    I love that


    To me philosophy is a search for truth and reality


    You apply all known facts and then look for the impact on humans of our current knowledge and try to understand and convey that impact on what’s best for mankind and the physical world that is our home


    It requires a love of mankind and knowledge applied to create a more perfect world
    If I had to choose an ancient language to learn, it would be Greek not Latin.

    The heritage of western civilization goes back to Greek -- religion, literature, philosophy.

    I have always appreciated that you are a philosophically-thinking person

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Cypress For This Post:

    evince (06-22-2021)

  13. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,527
    Thanks
    72,464
    Thanked 35,774 Times in 27,248 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    I trust for the most part the scholars who came after to be honest in their attempts to pass it down to us


    But like any other human endeavor read as many human takes as one can to more clearly suss it out


    Love of knowledge

  14. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,527
    Thanks
    72,464
    Thanked 35,774 Times in 27,248 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,590 Times in 18,179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by goat View Post
    Plato's Socrates said philosophy is the only true science. This was made in comparison to architecture, engineering, and art.
    https://web.maths.unsw.edu.au/~jim/irv.pdf


    Aristotle’s take

  15. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,905
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default Why do you view aesthetics as so central to philosophy?

    MILLGRAM: Leverage. Aesthetics has been ghettoized. If you look back a couple hundred years, if you look at people who are strong all-around philosophers, they knew they had to have views in aesthetics because they would need those views for something else. Kant had to have views in aesthetics to make sure he’d gotten the first Critique right. Schopenhauer had to have views in aesthetics. Nietzche had to have views in aesthetics. Hume had to have views in aesthetics.

    https://conversationswithtyler.com/e...ijah-millgram/

  16. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,212
    Thanks
    35,762
    Thanked 50,717 Times in 27,347 Posts
    Groans
    22
    Groaned 2,977 Times in 2,694 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BidenPresident View Post
    Aristotle did not consider math to be the proper method of describing nature.
    Right, he did not share Plato's reverence for mathematics and geometry.

    I think the natural philosophy Aristotle was doing was mostly just observation and deductive speculation.

    That is why the physics of Aristotle crumbled into irrelevance almost immediately when the experimental science of Galileo was brought to bear in the investigation of mechanics and motion.

  17. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Posts
    53,905
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 15,989 Times in 11,516 Posts
    Groans
    873
    Groaned 2,459 Times in 2,200 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    Right, he did not share Plato's reverence for mathematics and geometry.

    I think the natural philosophy Aristotle was doing was mostly just observation and deductive speculation.

    That is why the physics of Aristotle crumbled into irrelevance almost immediately when the experimental science of Galileo was brought to bear in the investigation of mechanics and motion.

    Aristotle did empirical biology. Galileo's physics were all math based. That is the difference from Aristotle.

  18. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    11,740
    Thanks
    2,319
    Thanked 2,327 Times in 1,987 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 184 Times in 174 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cypress View Post
    "Science" is derived from a Latin word, and has only been used since the 18th century to represent the kind of experimental inductive logic Francis Bacon advocated at the dawn of the scientific age.

    Plato did not speak Latin and did not use the word science.

    It is obviously an artifact of bad translation, and the only reason I nitpick it is because my cousin is a professional interpreter and translator.

    The Greeks were not doing experimental science.

    Plato would written in lexicon appropriate for ancient Greece, aka philosophia and episteme, or other Greek analogs for knowlege and natural philosophy.
    Where would we be without english translations? Plato saw reason as a science in the english version of Republic. He somewhat proves it in Apology where he takes a deep dive into human behavior.

    The Greeks were pretty good at mathematics and engineering hundreds of years before Plato. My thread on hunter-gatherers shows that humans were engineering more than 12,000 years ago. They didn't call it science even though there's evidence of astronomy.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-15-2022, 06:03 PM
  2. Philosophy of science
    By Cypress in forum Religion, Philosophy, and Ethics
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 03-19-2021, 07:57 AM
  3. First Kill The Philosophy
    By Flanders in forum Religion, Philosophy, and Ethics
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-26-2020, 11:45 AM
  4. Philosophy and Religion?!!
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-18-2013, 05:48 AM
  5. The philosophy of WM
    By FUCK THE POLICE in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-26-2008, 04:25 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •