Alabama cop w/restraining order gets his gun back and kills his 31 y/o wife with it

[Nomad]

WHO GAVE HIM THE GUN BACK???

The people he worked for.... the police.

[volsrock]

The people he worked for.... the police.

So he broke the law by having a gun..and u think another gun law would have stopped him?

[Nomad]

So he broke the law by having a gun..and u think another gun law would have stopped him?

Read the fucking article, idiot.

He was a cop. He assaulted his wife by shooting her in the arm and wounding her. He had his gun taken away, a restraining order paced against him and was facing pending assault charges, but they eventually gave him his gun back which he later on used to kill his wife with.

Having a gun in the house increases the chances that someone is going to get shot with it.

Doesn't take a genius to figure it out, but if you're a moron you probably won't get it.

And since you and your gun-goober buddies don't get it, I guess we know what that makes you all.

[Grumpy]

.
Man gets his gun back nine months after domestic altercation and uses it to shoot and kill his wife

Hmmm ... a restraining order ... had it for two years ... calling her his wife ... hmmm

I would believe 'ex' or 'former' ... but not just 'wife'. Now if she was indeed STILL his wife ... then the cause of 'the argument' needs to be investigated. "Husbands that come home early kill wives".

[volsrock]

Read the fucking article, idiot.

He was a cop. He assaulted his wife by shooting her in the arm and wounding her. He had his gun taken away, a restraining order paced against him and was facing pending assault charges, but they eventually gave him his gun back which he later on used to kill his wife with.

Having a gun in the house increases the chances that someone is going to get shot with it.

Doesn't take a genius to figure it out, but if you're a moron you probably won't get it.

And since you and your gun-goober buddies don't get it, I guess we know what that makes you all.

I have a gun in the house for 40 years its not shot anyone!

My Dad has for 60 years his gun not shot anyone

I have a friend had one in house also for 30 years not shot anyone..but a car did hit and kill his daughter

[Sirthinksalot]

Tell us again about how having a gun in the home makes people more safe than less safe, gun goobers...

Do you think he could have killed her in some other way if he didn't have a gun? I'm guessing yes.

[volsrock]

Read the fucking article, idiot.

He was a cop. He assaulted his wife by shooting her in the arm and wounding her. He had his gun taken away, a restraining order paced against him and was facing pending assault charges, but they eventually gave him his gun back which he later on used to kill his wife with.

Having a gun in the house increases the chances that someone is going to get shot with it.

Doesn't take a genius to figure it out, but if you're a moron you probably won't get it.

And since you and your gun-goober buddies don't get it, I guess we know what that makes you all.

Getting into a car increases the chances that u will die

So do u get into cars?

[Nomad]

I have a gun in the house for 40 years its not shot anyone!

My Dad has for 60 years his gun not shot anyone

I have a friend had one in house also for 30 years not shot anyone..but a car did hit and kill his daughter

Anecdotal evidence means nothing.

Statistically you are several times more likely to shoot or get shot by someone with a gun in your house or in your car or in your possession.

Anyone with a normal degree of intelligence ought to be able to put that together.

[Nomad]

Do you think he could have killed her in some other way if he didn't have a gun? I'm guessing yes.

He could have, but would he have?

The point remains that guns are the #1 weapon of choice used in violent crimes.

Without guns, the violent crime rate would drop like a stone.

Wouldn't go away completely, but it would be a fraction of what it is now.

[Nomad]

Getting into a car increases the chances that u will die

So do u get into cars?

Cars are a necessary part of modern life that people must use to get around and do the things they need to do.

Guns are not necessary for anything but committing mayhem.

With cars, the operator can minimize his or her chances of injury or death by obeying traffic laws, driving with caution and wearing seat belts.

Not even close to the same thing.

[Grumpy]

He could have, but would he have?

Like I said in my previous post ... it depends on what "the argument" was about

[volsrock]

Anecdotal evidence means nothing.

Statistically you are several times more likely to shoot or get shot by someone with a gun in your house or in your car or in your possession.

Anyone with a normal degree of intelligence ought to be able to put that together.

Lifetime odds of death for selected causes, United States, 2019

Gun assault 1 in 289


Car Crash 1 in 107

Fall 1 in 106

https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/all-inju...odds-of-dying/


So dont get in a car or get out of bed...greater chance that will kill u than a gun!

[Sirthinksalot]

He could have, but would he have?

The point remains that guns are the #1 weapon of choice used in violent crimes.

Without guns, the violent crime rate would drop like a stone.

Wouldn't go away completely, but it would be a fraction of what it is now.

Without criminals it would go down farther and faster.

[volsrock]

According to the CDC, about 14,500 Americans were murdered with guns in 2017. More than half were young black men killed in metro BLUE areas, which has been the pattern for at least the last five years, data shows.

young black males are around 4% of the population and are committing more than half of all murders


we have a black culture and blue city problem

[Grumpy]

Lifetime odds of death for selected causes, United States, 2019

Gun assault 1 in 289

Car Crash 1 in 107

Fall 1 in 106

https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/all-inju...odds-of-dying/

So dont get in a car or get out of bed...greater chance that will kill u than a gun!

YOU AND YOUR DAMNED FACTS