And now we have Tuesday’s mass shooting,

[evince]

there are over 20 thousand different state and federal gun laws on the books right now.........and you want MORE????? how about 'no'.

You Q people are not the American majority

[SmarterthanYou]

Almost all of those laws are aimed at the end user.

For gun laws to be effective, they have to be aimed at the manufacturers and sellers.

There needs to be a restriction on how many guns can be manufactured and sold in this country as well as the number and type that can be owned.

so, like the anti machine gun laws, you only want the wealthy and elite to have guns.....is that because you trust in them more than your fellow american?

[SmarterthanYou]

You Q people are not the American majority

good thing we're talking about another demographic........

[SmarterthanYou]

Nope. I want people to qualify for gun ownership. They should be tested and regulated. They are not. Most angry rightys would not qualify.

and while we're at it, we can implement a poll tax and literacy test for voting.......we know who wouldn't qualify for that, don't we?

[Nomad]

so, like the anti machine gun laws, you only want the wealthy and elite to have guns.....is that because you trust in them more than your fellow american?

The law should apply equally across the board.

[SmarterthanYou]

The law should apply equally across the board.

should, but we already know they don't and never will.........but you prefer tyranny of the wealthy over freedom of the people

[Old Trapper]

It's not because of the things you mentioned. The fact is the ONLY way to PREVENT mass shootings is complete confiscation of guns and the prohibition of manufacturing.

That is a lie. We did not need such rules in the past, just in the past 20 years, and it is getting worse as more guns are available, and more capable of shooting 100 rounds in seconds..

BTW, a "mass shooting" is defined as four or more killed, or wounded.

[Yakuda]

Two things, first, every mass shooting has three common variables; the shooter, the place, and the gun. We can never know who the next shooter will be. We can do out best to defend the most vulnerable locations, but can’t cover them all. However the one variable we can control is that which makes it all possible, the weapon. If one is serious on addressing mass shootings access to the gun is where they start

Secondly, confiscation of guns has never been an actual policy on regulation, no one is coming to grab your whatever, and your vehicle is also registered, but you don’t just register it once, and just registering a vehicle isn’t all one does to keep and operate a vehicle

Thanks. I have no major disagreement except with your view on confiscation.

Would you consider answering the question I posed please?

[Old Trapper]

should, but we already know they don't and never will.........but you prefer tyranny of the wealthy over freedom of the people

That is a dumb ass comment considering all of the bennies your kind prefer to give to the wealthy, especially the White ones, while depriving the poor of even a living wage.

[Wolverine]

Almost all of those laws are aimed at the end user.

For gun laws to be effective, they have to be aimed at the manufacturers and sellers.

There needs to be a restriction on how many guns can be manufactured and sold in this country as well as the number and type that can be owned.

Freedom says up yours!

[Micawber]

It's deplorable.

[Wolverine]

They can keep their gun


We can grandfather it in


You already own one legally then you can keep it



When it leaves your hands it goes to the government and they pay you for it and then melt it the fuck down


You can not give it away to anyone


No one can inherit it from you


No one can buy it from you


Again

If you are done with owning the gun the government pays you for it


It then belongs to them

And they melt it the fuck down



If a gun changes hands out side of this both the seller and the new possessor are in big trouble

You invite tyranny sheep!

[Yakuda]

That is a lie. We did not need such rules in the past, just in the past 20 years, and it is getting worse as more guns are available, and more capable of shooting 100 rounds in seconds..

BTW, a "mass shooting" is defined as four or more killed, or wounded.

Prove it's a lie.

I believe it's 3 in the same place. Do should my 5 round .38 special revolver be outlawed since I could kill 5 people in one place?

[Nordberg]

and while we're at it, we can implement a poll tax and literacy test for voting.......we know who wouldn't qualify for that, don't we?

I bet you thought that made sense. We do have strict rules for driving. Let's start with similar rules for guns. We have laws and rules and enforcement to make driving safer. We sell guns at millions of stores and street corners. People should show a need for guns and qualify with testing. They should have a license and it should have to be renewed regularly.
Car manufacturers are continuously making them safer. Gun manufacturers are making guns more deadly. 300 mass shootings in 6 months is simply wrong and we should stop them.

[Wolverine]

I bet you thought that made sense. We do have strict rules for driving. Let's start with similar rules for guns. We have laws and rules and enforcement to make driving safer. We sell guns at millions of stores and street corners. People should show a need for guns and qualify with testing. They should have a license and it should have to be renewed regularly.
Car manufacturers are continuously making them safer. Gun manufacturers are making guns more deadly. 300 mass shootings in 6 months is simply wrong and we should stop them.

Freedom says up yours!