cancel2 2022 (06-15-2021)
cancel2 2022 (06-15-2021)
The OP article has probably spawned 3-4 threads by now [because it’s so good] and I’ve yet to see a cogent response to it from the left.
Trump, is not a response. It has nothing to do with Trump. It has to do with intentionally engineering a virus so it becomes virulent towards humans. The prospect that it leaked out of lab in China is very real; and in fact, very likely.
And this *isn’t* news.
This has been known to be the case since at least January of last year when Fauci was alerted to *the distinct possibility* that the Covid virus was a product of intelligent design [I like putting it that way because that’s exactly what it would be] and not something that should occur through an evolutionary process.
That is what the expert told Fauci in an email. What did Fauci do? Did he tell his boss, the president? Nope, that would be politically inexpedient. Also, Fauci himself could be implicated because his NIH has funded GOF research on the very bat virus that caused the pandemic, in a virology lab, located in the same general vicinity as where the pandemic originated.
And in the face of these *facts* the country/the world was being told the Covid virus occurred naturally and that the lab leak theory was ‘a conspiracy theory’.
Trump, indeed.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
cancel2 2022 (06-15-2021)
Well, we have two choices.
We can pretend it doesn’t matter that the CCP is directly responsible for not only creating a virulent pathogen that killed millions *but allowing it* to be spread across the globe.
Yes, ignoring it is an option. But this will embolden the CCP. Why wouldn’t it? They will have gotten away with dropping the equivalent of a nuclear weapon on the world and the world gives a collective yawn in response, so yeah, why not try something else?
Or, we can do things like sanction them: divest from them; shut off our markets to them. There are ways to make China feel pain and there are people making well over six figures who are supposed thinking of nothing else besides these sorts of things. I’m only sufficiently equipped to judge the natural origin theory as likely bullshit.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
cancel2 2022 (06-15-2021), RB 60 (06-15-2021)
This virus has been around a long time, the fact they mutate is the hard part. Whether the Wuhan lab was working on it for knowledge and accidently released it is a valid question but the Chinese government is not big on confessing fault. It is a shame Trump was president too, as he is a fool totally out of his league.
'Coronavirus is our future | Alanna Shaikh | TEDxSMU'
https://www.ted.com/talks/alanna_sha...ure/transcript
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...us-Information
Wanna make America great, buy American owned, made in the USA, we do. AF Veteran, INFJ-A, I am not PC.
"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord make my enemies ridiculous.' And God granted it." Voltaire
cancel2 2022 (06-15-2021)
Trumpet (06-15-2021)
.
I can see why the sheeple can't get their heads around this, it requires a good understanding of science and the politics behind it all.
Contrary to the letter writers’ assertion, the idea that the virus might have escaped from a lab invoked accident, not conspiracy. It surely needed to be explored, not rejected out of hand. A defining mark of good scientists is that they go to great pains to distinguish between what they know and what they don’t know. By this criterion, the signatories of the Lancet letter were behaving as poor scientists: They were assuring the public of facts they could not know for sure were true.
It later turned out that the Lancet letter had been organized and drafted by Peter Daszak, president of the EcoHealth Alliance of New York. Daszak’s organization funded coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. If the SARS2 virus had indeed escaped from research he funded, Daszak would be potentially culpable. This acute conflict of interest was not declared to the Lancet’s readers. To the contrary, the letter concluded, “We declare no competing interests.”
Last edited by cancel2 2022; 06-15-2021 at 11:12 AM.
cancel2 2022 (06-15-2021)
Bookmarks