Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567
Results 91 to 99 of 99

Thread: Hydroxychloroquine is effective for COVID remediation

  1. #91 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Bullshit, Trump didn't recommend the drug as a possible treatment for Covid but as the life saver against Covid, as if he suddenly he found the magical cure that was going to save us all from the dreaded virus, and for that he was "dragged"
    what?
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN23M2UO
    President Donald Trump said on Monday other countries had provided great reports on the effectiveness of malaria drug hydroxychloroquine for treatment of the deadly coronavirus,

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    ExpressLane (06-15-2021)

  3. #92 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NiftyNiblick View Post
    Despite this breaking "news,'
    bleach is still the recommended prescription for trumpanzee mutants.

    Another ignorant cunt!

    On COVID-19, Donald Trump said that “maybe if you drank bleach you may be okay.”

    Joe Biden said President Donald Trump told Americans that drinking bleach could help combat the coronavirus, but that’s not correct.

    Trump did not explicitly recommend ingesting a disinfectant like bleach. But he did express interest in exploring whether disinfectants could be applied to the site of a coronavirus infection inside the body, such as the lungs.

    Responding to confusion over Trump’s comments, the maker of Lysol said in a statement that "under no circumstance" should its products be used in the human body.
    https://www.politifact.com/factcheck...d-coronavirus/
    Last edited by cancel2 2022; 06-15-2021 at 09:26 AM.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to cancel2 2022 For This Post:

    ExpressLane (06-15-2021)

  5. #93 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    almost all the studies were HCQ by itself and the dosages varied and the time frame was too late for hospitalization.
    it has to be given early, and it's best with D3/Zpak
    Early hydroxychloroquine but not chloroquine use reduces ICU admission in COVID-19 patients
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...01971220321755

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (06-15-2021), ExpressLane (06-15-2021)

  7. #94 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,923
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,835 Times in 17,266 Posts
    Groans
    5,349
    Groaned 4,601 Times in 4,278 Posts

    Default

    Rights are arguing hydroxy due to tribalism. They never want to admit what a joke Trump was. To accept the science shows Trump was wasting time and money. https://medcitynews.com/2020/08/why-...-for-covid-19/ That is the fact rightys refuse to face.

  8. #95 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    SEE?? THEY'RE STILL LYING ABOUT IT....^^^^^^^^^
    doesnt matter.
    there are too many studies where the early use combined with other cohorts shows relief from cytokine storm
    It's almost like they sabotaged the use by poor clinical application
    it helps prevent early viral replication. and it needs support from zinc, D3 etc

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    ExpressLane (06-15-2021)

  10. #96 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    52,794
    Thanks
    13,341
    Thanked 22,579 Times in 15,814 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,951 Times in 1,862 Posts

    Default

    When this inexpensive oral medication is given very early in the course of illness, before the virus has had time to multiply beyond control, it has shown to be highly effective, especially when given in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc.

    On May 27, I published an article in the American Journal of Epidemiology (AJE) entitled, "Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk COVID-19 Patients that Should be Ramped-Up Immediately as Key to the Pandemic Crisis." That article, published in the world's leading epidemiology journal, analyzed five studies, demonstrating clear-cut and significant benefits to treated patients, plus other very large studies that showed the medication safety.

    Physicians who have been using these medications in the face of widespread skepticism have been truly heroic. They have done what the science shows is best for their patients, often at great personal risk. I myself know of two doctors who have saved the lives of hundreds of patients with these medications, but are now fighting state medical boards to save their licenses and reputations. The cases against them are completely without scientific merit.
    Newsweek Newsletter sign-up >

    Since publication of my May 27 article, seven more studies have demonstrated similar benefit. In a lengthy follow-up letter, also published by AJE, I discuss these seven studies and renew my call for the immediate early use of hydroxychloroquine in high-risk patients
    These seven studies include: an additional 400 high-risk patients treated by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, with zero deaths; four studies totaling almost 500 high-risk patients treated in nursing homes and clinics across the U.S., with no deaths; a controlled trial of more than 700 high-risk patients in Brazil, with significantly reduced risk of hospitalization and two deaths among 334 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine; and another study of 398 matched patients in France, also with significantly reduced hospitalization risk. Since my letter was published, even more doctors have reported to me their completely successful use.

    Beyond these studies of individual patients, we have seen what happens in large populations when these drugs are used. These have been "natural experiments." In the northern Brazil state of Pará, COVID-19 deaths were increasing exponentially. On April 6, the public hospital network purchased 75,000 doses of azithromycin and 90,000 doses of hydroxychloroquine. Over the next few weeks, authorities began distributing these medications to infected individuals. Even though new cases continued to occur, on May 22 the death rate started to plummet and is now about one-eighth what it was at the peak.

    First, as all know, the medication has become highly politicized. For many, it is viewed as a marker of political identity, on both sides of the political spectrum. Nobody needs me to remind them that this is not how medicine should proceed. We must judge this medication strictly on the science. When doctors graduate from medical school, they formally promise to make the health and life of the patient their first consideration, without biases of race, religion, nationality, social standing—or political affiliation. Lives must come first.

    Second, the drug has not been used properly in many studies. Hydroxychloroquine has shown major success when used early in high-risk people but, as one would expect for an antiviral, much less success when used late in the disease course. Even so, it has demonstrated significant benefit in large hospital studies in Michigan and New York City when started within the first 24 to 48 hours after admission.

    In fact, as inexpensive, oral and widely available medications, and a nutritional supplement, the combination of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin or doxycycline, and zinc are well-suited for early treatment in the outpatient setting. The combination should be prescribed in high-risk patients immediately upon clinical suspicion of COVID-19 disease, without waiting for results of testing. Delays in waiting before starting the medications can reduce their efficacy.

    Third, concerns have been raised by the FDA and others about risks of cardiac arrhythmia, especially when hydroxychloroquine is given in combination with azithromycin. The FDA based its comments on data in its FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. This reporting system captured up to a thousand cases of arrhythmias attributed to hydroxychloroquine use. In fact, the number is likely higher than that, since the reporting system, which requires physicians or patients to initiate contact with the FDA, appreciably undercounts drug side effects.

    But what the FDA did not announce is that these adverse events were generated from tens of millions of patient uses of hydroxychloroquine for long periods of time, often for the chronic treatment of lupus or rheumatoid arthritis. Even if the true rates of arrhythmia are ten-fold higher than those reported, the harms would be minuscule compared to the mortality occurring right now in inadequately treated high-risk COVID-19 patients.

    This fact is proven by an Oxford University study of more than 320,000 older patients taking both hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, who had arrhythmia excess death rates of less than 9/100,000 users, as I discuss in my May 27 paper cited above. A new paper in the American Journal of Medicine by established cardiologists around the world fully agrees with this.
    https://www.newsweek.com/key-defeati...pinion-1519535

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    ExpressLane (06-15-2021)

  12. #97 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    42,192
    Thanks
    27,017
    Thanked 20,184 Times in 14,718 Posts
    Groans
    1,437
    Groaned 952 Times in 936 Posts
    Blog Entries
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Primavera View Post
    They don't care if they lie.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to ExpressLane For This Post:

    cancel2 2022 (06-15-2021)

  14. #98 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,923
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 24,835 Times in 17,266 Posts
    Groans
    5,349
    Groaned 4,601 Times in 4,278 Posts

    Default

    Hydroxy does not work, it causes more deaths. https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipelin...0/09/hard-data I know, it is a scientific study, so it does not count to rightys.

  15. The Following User Groans At Nordberg For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (06-15-2021)

  16. #99 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    28,403
    Thanks
    26,104
    Thanked 11,856 Times in 8,415 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,290 Times in 2,172 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Primavera View Post
    You're an incredibly stupid person even for a Californicator.
    You're not called the Lord of Cretins for nothing.
    Lock Him Up

Similar Threads

  1. New Study: HCQ Protocol ‘Effective’ Against COVID-19
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 12-10-2020, 06:55 AM
  2. Pfizer says Covid-19 Vaccine is 90% effective... Stocks LOVE it.
    By Damocles in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 139
    Last Post: 11-18-2020, 04:38 AM
  3. Hydroxychloroquine would you take it you were critical with COVID 19
    By ExpressLane in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 04-07-2020, 03:15 AM
  4. Hydroxychloroquine proven effective for COVID 19 by new Chinese study
    By ExpressLane in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 04-06-2020, 04:45 PM
  5. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-02-2020, 03:06 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •