Page 10 of 26 FirstFirst ... 6789101112131420 ... LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 379

Thread: WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE POST 2020 ELECTION FORSENIC AUDITS PROVE BIDEN CHEATED

  1. #136 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    136,604
    Thanks
    46,753
    Thanked 68,628 Times in 51,918 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,506 Times in 2,463 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dachshund View Post
    I would like to know what people here predict will happen after the hand-counted, FORSENIC audits of the November, 2020, Presidential election results in the critical "Swing States" of: Arizona; Pennsylvania; Michigan; Wisconsin, etc; objectively prove that Biden is an illegitimate/unconstitutional POTUS ?...
    Dear fucking idiot Q boy



    It’s not possible


    There was no cheating by Biden


    Fuck you very much
    The wiener dog is a Bogan Aussie. TBH, I'm impressed that he can log on and type a post. Most cannot.

    There's a reason why Americans can have almost any Aussie chick if they think the American can get them away from Aussie men.
    God bless America and those who defend our Constitution.

    "Hatred is a failure of imagination" - Graham Greene, "The Power and the Glory"

  2. #137 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,578
    Thanks
    18,197
    Thanked 15,614 Times in 10,679 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 617 Times in 606 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    let's start at the beginning. There are people here who said they were in Q and others that showed they agreed with its"philosophy". Deal with facts. It will not be painful.
    WHO? I MEAN, IF IT'S PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE...WHO?
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  3. #138 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,841
    Thanks
    30,532
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    Good call. This is also called the Bulverism fallacy.
    "The atmosphere is among the factors that determines the Earth's atmosphere." --ZenMode
    "Donald has failed in almost every endeavor he has attempted. " --floridafan
    "Abortion is not a moral issue. " --BidenPresident
    "Propaganda can also be factual." --Flash
    "Even after being vaccinated, you shed virus particles." --Jerome
    "no slavery is forcing another into labor" -archives
    "Evs are much safer from fires" -- Nordberg
    "Abortion has killed no one." -- LurchAddams

  4. #139 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    WHO? I MEAN, IF IT'S PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE...WHO?
    Will you understand if he can't explain?

  5. #140 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,534
    Thanks
    65,163
    Thanked 38,094 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dachshund View Post
    Lawsuits against the 2020 election result were taken to 60 Federal Courts, NOT ONE of them looked at the merits of the cases. They were ALL dismissed on procedural grounds because the Judges were too frightened to do the right thing. FACT.

    Same for the US Supreme Court. Chief Justice Roberts - a gutless cocksucker - punted the "State of Texas vs Pennsylvania, etc." lawsuit because he knew if it were examined on its merits, it would overturn the 2020 election result, and he peed his pants at the thought of what might happen to him in consequence.


    Dachshund
    The suits are crap and the judges know it.

    Definition of Motion to Dismiss

    Noun

    1. A motion filed by either party in a lawsuit asking the court to throw out part of the case, or the case in its entirety.


    Reasons for Filing a Motion to Dismiss


    A Motion to Dismiss is often filed with the court at the earliest stages of the lawsuit, typically before either party has conducted their discovery. This is done when the defendant believes a claim in the lawsuit is legally invalid, or there are legitimate grounds for throwing the case out of court. When a Motion to Dismiss is filed, information supporting the grounds for dismissal must be included in the motion. There are different reasons for filing a Motion to Dismiss, many of which revolve around the following legal deficiencies:

    Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction


    The court in which the lawsuit was filed does not have jurisdiction, or the authority, to rule on the matter at hand. For example, a suit requesting enforcement of a child support order cannot be heard in small claims court.

    Lack of Personal Jurisdiction


    The court does not have the authority to rule on matters that affect one or all of the parties. For example, if Bob is in a car accident in Florida, and the other party involved in the accident files a lawsuit in California, the court would not be able to hear the case.

    Improper Venue


    The court, or “venue,” in which the matter has been fined is the wrong court to hear the case. For example, Amanda’s accountant, Charlie, siphoned money out of her account for his personal use. Charlie is charged with the crime of embezzlement in criminal court. Amanda wants to sue Charlie for her financial losses, but the criminal court cannot hear that part of the case, as it is not the proper venue. Amanda must file a lawsuit in civil court for damages related to the crime.

    Failure to State a Claim for Which Relief Can be Granted


    If the plaintiff fails to provide sufficient facts to, if taken on face value as being true, indicate that the defendant violated a law, or caused harm or loss due to negligence, he has failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted. In other words, if the complaint does not clearly say what the defendant did wrong, the court cannot grant any form of relief, and so the case does not need to be heard. For example, there is a company policy that employees greet one another in a friendly manner at work. Joe files a lawsuit claiming that Bob failed to say hello in passing. Bob can file a Motion to Dismiss, as failing to greet another person is not illegal, therefore there is no claim for which relief can be granted.

    https://legaldictionary.net/motion-to-dismiss/


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  6. #141 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    The suits are crap and the judges know it.
    So you say.

  7. #142 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,534
    Thanks
    65,163
    Thanked 38,094 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion View Post
    So you say.
    Yep, me and the sixty judges.

     
    And you, too.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  8. #143 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,534
    Thanks
    65,163
    Thanked 38,094 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    The "Audits" are not being conducted by honest people. Nothing will be done.

    If objective audits were conducted that proved such a thing, still nothing would be done with relation to Biden being president, because he became president by the Constitutional process of Congress certifying him as President. What might happen in such an unlikely case is a lot of new voting restrictions and hopefully some arrests. Are audits going on in Pennsylvania; Michigan; Wisconsin, etc?
    Not in PA. They're still trying.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  9. #144 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,534
    Thanks
    65,163
    Thanked 38,094 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by katzgar View Post
    the problem with you being a moron is you are a moron. When the judge asked trumps lawyer if the case had merit none answered in the affirmative, if they lied and said yes and the case turned out to be BS as they were the lawyer would be disbarred. Holy crap why is being a moron ro important to you?
    ^ And this is the money quote. Those lawyers aren't dumb enough to lose their livelihoods over trump.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to christiefan915 For This Post:

    katzgar (06-16-2021)

  11. #145 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,534
    Thanks
    65,163
    Thanked 38,094 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drummie123 View Post
    Nothing will happen as long as the "Swamp" remains undrained.
    So trump didn't drain the swamp as he promised.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to christiefan915 For This Post:

    katzgar (06-16-2021)

  13. #146 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    Yep, me and the sixty judges.
    Is that so?

    LINK

  14. #147 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    trump
    .

  15. #148 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    107,358
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    DEMOCRATS like to claim that "Trump lost all the legal cases".

    Let’s take a look.

    The majority of the lawsuits were about constitutional issues, mail in ballot deadlines, insufficient poll observers, etc.

    The most important of the fraud lawsuits was Texas v Pennsylvania.

    That wasn't lost - it was rejected due to a lack of standing.

    Pirkle v. Wolf was withdrawn.

    Metcalfe v. Wolf wasn't heard because of a technicality. Supposedly the deadline to file a Class ll lawsuit had passed.

    In Michigan, Bally v. Whitmer was withdrawn after the judge denied a request for an independent audit.

    King vs. Whitmer was denied a hearing because it was "too late" with the comment that the “ship has sailed.”

    Feehan v. Wisconsin was denied a hearing due to a lack of standing.

    Trump v. Hobbs was dropped because Arizona finished counting their votes before the case could be heard.

    Bowyer v. Ducey was rejected due to a lack of standing.

    Burk v. Ducey was dismissed due to “lack of standing and the failure to file a timely verified election contest.”

    Pearson v. Kemp was dismissed as moot because the court lacked jurisdiction.

    Wood v. Raffensberger was denied for a lack of standing and because it was filed too late.

    None of these cases were rejected on merit or evidential grounds.

    These cases were rejected or withdrawn for procedural reasons, time constraints, etc. Not one was "lost".

    Every state had to certify their results by December 8th.

    On December 14th the Electoral College had to vote.

    On January 5th Congress had to certify the results.

    Of all this would have been fine, except that the DEMOCRATS extra-legally extended balloting way past the statutory limits in key states - by design.

    That left very short timeframes to gather evidence, file suits, and then argue it before (mainly hostile) courts. Multiple state elections had to be challenged to overturn the results.

    SCOTUS refused to get involved.

    So here we are, and now that the dust has settled, DEMOCRATS refuse to allow a second look.

  16. #149 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,534
    Thanks
    65,163
    Thanked 38,094 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drummie123 View Post
    If the mainstream media has greater influence and has more networks and newspapers and reporters and resources than the patriotic RW media ...

    And if it is proven the mainstream media lied and obscured and spun their coverage of Trump to report 96% negatively about him ...

    And you eschew* the RW media and only consume the mainstream media news ...

    But, because the mainstream media pervades our society and culture to the point where it is almost impossible to avoid, even RW'ers know what they are saying ...

    So, who do you think has a more accurate grasp of what's going on and how well Trump presided vs how creepy Biden is?

    * es•chew ĕs-choo͞′►
    transitive verb To avoid using, accepting, participating in, or partaking of:
    I believe Faux News is mainstream media.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  17. #150 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    5,093
    Thanks
    1,079
    Thanked 673 Times in 582 Posts
    Groans
    80
    Groaned 28 Times in 25 Posts
    Blog Entries
    66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    I believe Faux News is mainstream media.
    And that's why someone claiming to get a complete or even an adequate picture of the news about Trump or of the current news of the world by asserting that they watch msm AND FOX news is likely under-nourished informationally and unaware of what they are missing.

    Therefore, they are in no position to tell us anything but their own description of what the elephant looks like from their limited perspective.



    The parable of the blind men and an elephant originated in the ancient Indian subcontinent, from where it has been widely diffused. It is a story of a group of blind men who have never come across an elephant before and who learn and conceptualize what the elephant is like by touching it. Each blind man feels a different part of the elephant's body, but only one part, such as the side or the tusk.
    The Left will cause Government of the people, by the people, for the people, to perish from the Earth.

    Trump is mankind's last hope to preserve Liberty.



    MAGA

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Drummie123 For This Post:

    artichoke (06-15-2021)

Similar Threads

  1. Pedodent Biden's latest CONSPIRACY THEORY - Russians meddled in 2020 election
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-17-2021, 08:45 PM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-08-2020, 11:44 PM
  3. How did Joe Biden did it Wide coalition powered win in 2020 election
    By Guno צְבִי in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-08-2020, 08:25 AM
  4. KAMALA HARRIS CONFIRMED AS BIDEN'S RUNNING MATE FOR NOVEMBER ELECTION 2020
    By Dachshynddawg in forum Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories Forum
    Replies: 124
    Last Post: 08-05-2020, 05:44 AM
  5. Replies: 83
    Last Post: 08-01-2020, 07:08 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •