no worries (06-15-2021)
WHy you lying bastard. YOU TOOK THE CNN AND NYT REPORTS OUT OF CONTEXT!
THERE IS NO UPDATE ON hydroxychloroquine THAT HAS CHANGED. And if you had of posted the OPed in it's entirety, instead of just one sentence from the oped that plays into your narrative, you would have understood that the OPed was not about giving hydroxychloroquine a go.
What CNN and the NYT were trying to point out was these small studies are not acceptable and were not truthful- YOU FUCKING NUMBNUTSCOMPOOT!
NICE TRY MORON! BUT YOU FAIL!
THIS IS MISINFORMATION AND TAKING WHAT THE MEDIA SAYS AND MANIPULATING IT FOR PROPAGANDA and RHETORIC- FAKE NEWS!
NOW HERE IS THE TRUTH.......................ONCE AND FOR FUCKING ALL!
This report is dated Thursday, March 25, 2021
https://www.cochrane.org/news/chloro...ting-infection
Last edited by Geeko Sportivo; 06-14-2021 at 01:49 PM.
no worries (06-15-2021)
Translation: You fail to comprehend what you read, ask the same question over and over, and over again, until people get sick of going in circles with your reading comprehension issues, and then you falsely accuse them of avoiding the subject.
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #2
Trying to blatantly pretend away already established facts. This is invalid and childish.
Wow.
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #2
Trying to blatantly pretend away already established facts. This is invalid and childish.
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #2
Trying to blatantly pretend away already established facts. This is invalid and childish.
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #2
Trying to blatantly pretend away already established facts. This is invalid and childish.
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #2
Trying to blatantly pretend away already established facts. This is invalid and childish.
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1
Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:
-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).
-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.
-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?
-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.
-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.
Yes, attacking the debater instead of their argument, which is exactly what your entire "counterpoint" here is centered on, is an ad hominem fallacy, even if you resort to blind denial about this as well.
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #2
Trying to blatantly pretend away already established facts. This is invalid and childish.
1) Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1
Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:
-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).
-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.
-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?
-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.
-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.
2) When the outcome is literally mathematically impossible, that IS the proof that something else happened. Things that are proven, are not lies, genius.
3) The only way one Democrats can cheat is if Republicans helped them steal the election...from Republicans? Seriously. That's what you're going with?
This blatantly stupid falsehood stands on its own two feet as a glaring testament to your garbage logic.
Hint: You don't just get to pretend away facts and proof with mindless, baseless deflection and "make up whatever I feel like" story hour.
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1
Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:
-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).
-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.
-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?
-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.
-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.
Asked and answered a hundred times now.
Trying to deny what was already answered. This is invalid and childish.
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #4
Asked and answered a hundred times now.
Trying to deny what was already answered. This is invalid and childish.
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #4
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1 and #4.
For the record, since this has been lied about like a hundred times now by someone who seems to think they can just overwhelm people with a thousand spam posts per minute all repeating the same already addressed falsehoods, endlessly accusing them of not responding no matter how many times they respond...
Here is the answer I have given a hundred fucking times that this illiterate liar continuously spams the living shit out of this page with false accusations of going unaddressed:
-No one used the hydroxychloroquine supplies in Oklahoma, obviously, because Democrats lied about it and convinced everyone it was poison knowing full well that it was the cure...hence the entire point of the thread, dumb-ass.
(This is your cue to change the subject with 50 more posts and then start accusing me of never having addressed this again)
-The evidence that CNN and the NY Times now admit they lied this entire time and mass murdered thousands of people.
CNN: "Their study of 2,541 hospitalized patients found that those given hydroxychloroquine were much less likely to die."
NY Times admits hydro works.jpg
(This is your cue to change the subject with 50 more posts and then start accusing me of never having addressed this again)
-The evidence that we knew this the entire time and were screaming it from the rooftops while we were being crucified by the book-burning anti-science Democrat cult for deviating from the herd:
A New Study Shows, Again, That Hydroxychloroquine Works
Study finds hydroxychloroquine helped coronavirus patients survive better
Thousands of Doctors: Yes, Hydroxychloroquine Works Against Wuhan Coronavirus
Yale epidemiologist says hydroxychloroquine could save up to 100K lives if used for coronavirus
"Thousands of doctors admit Hydroxychloroquine works quickly and effectively against COVID, and that they would prescribe it for their own family members, yet Democrats repeatedly lied about it, attacked President Trump for pointing out how promising it was early on (before being forced to admit he was right), tried to smear him (the President who refuses his own salary) as trying to personally profit from it, and even falsely blamed him when random people absurdly tried ingesting non-medicinal Hydroxychloroquine with fatal results. Their intentional lies about this treatment cost thousands of people their lives."
(This is your cue to change the subject with 50 more posts and then start accusing me of never having addressed this again)
Like I said, your failure to comprehend what you read a hundred times in a row is not other people failing to address your moronic fallacies. Time for your next 50-page lying spree.
Is that what I did? Please, by all means, show us what "context" can undo this quote from CNN:
"Their study of 2,541 hospitalized patients found that those given hydroxychloroquine were much less likely to die."
No one CARES about the other 99% of the article with CNN rushing in to spin and lie about the devastating fact revealed in this statement (that the drug works, and has this entire time). Intelligent people go out of their way to filter out the noise, spin, and CNN propaganda and just look for what's there. YOU, on the other hand, pay attention only to their attempts to spin this devastating revelation as something other than what it is and then hysterically accuse others of lying for looking only at the true part.
Hint: You have to be capable of independent thought to read articles critically like this. The fact that you're hyperventilating over me not buying their irrelevant spin that attempts to portray the findings as the exact opposite of what they obviously mean...removes all doubt that you are one of the cattle that thinks what you're TOLD to think.
fat cnn fake.jpg
You being stupid doesn't make me a liar.
Try again.
Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1
Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:
-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).
-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.
-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?
-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.
-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Not what ad hominem is, you stupid bastard (<-THAT is ad hominem).
And your lack of action on 1/6 is wholly relevant to this debate because it speaks to your sincerity.
You say you sincerely believe the election was stolen, but you didn't do anything about it even though the magnitude of what you're alleging requires personal action on your part.
So you ran your big mouth, trying to convince other people to do the things you're too chickenshit to do yourself.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
artichoke (06-16-2021)
Trumptards claim Hydroxychloroquine is the cure for the disease that Trumptards claim is imaginary.
How fucking stupid can you get?
Has this entire time?
ROTLFMFAO!!! You didn't bother to read anything that you posted, did you?
Conveniently omitted was THIS statement in the CNN article (which incidentally is now almost a year old).
"It's a surprising finding because several other studies have found no benefit from hydroxychloroquine, a drug originally developed to treat and prevent malaria. President Donald Trump touted the drug heavily, but later studies found not only did patients not do better if they got the drug, they were more likely to suffer cardiac side effects."
Oops. You are a fucking clown.
learn to read and check things before you open your mouth and make a fool out of yourself.
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20...ion%20so%20far.
Bookmarks