christiefan915 (06-15-2021)
when did Democrats make hydroxy illegal?
link?
christiefan915 (06-15-2021)
If it worked, Oklahoma wouldn't have been sitting on millions of doses of it for nearly a year.
You got conned because you're just not that bright a person.
After all, you got tricked into thinking the election was stolen, but then were too much of a fucking coward to do anything about it on 1/6.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
No one said that. Try to keep up.
What was claimed was that they relentlessly lied and scaremongered everyone into being afraid to take the drug that would have saved their life. In criminal court, you would literally be convicted of murder if you stood over someone having a heart attack and lied to them about their heart medication being poison.
That's what Democrats did. Knowingly. For selfish, partisan gain. You people are the most reprehensible scumbags ever.
christiefan915 (06-15-2021)
Unless Democrats scared everyone into not taking it by lying about it.
Obviously, fucking imbecile.
And CNN, NY Times, thousands of doctors and studies in the links provided ALL say it works, and that it always did work, and that we always knew that it always worked...but you have decided that even your own propaganda mills are lying to hurt Democrats now?
Well thought-out, as always there, genius.
And no, that's probably the ONLY lie you WON'T encounter on CNN or the NY Times...one that hurts Democrats in any way.
1) An ironic comment coming from the MENSA member who literally just got done insisting that medication not being used must have nothing at all to do with relentless Democrat fear-mongering about it and must constitute proof that CNN, the NY Times, and thousands of doctors and studies are all lying.
Again, are the Russians in the room with us right now?
2) Again, CNN, NY Times, thousands of doctors and studies...they're ALL lying? I'M the one that got conned here?
Ah, back to this game.
1) Yes, I was "tricked" into thinking the literally mathematically impossible election outcome must mean something else happened...just like I was "tricked" into thinking water was wet.
2) No, it is possible to object to Democrat election theft and treason without becoming a domestic terrorist like Democrats (been doing it for decades now). And by the way, if you believed one-tenth of the hysterical conspiracy theories you peddle about President Trump, you must be a coward for sitting there and doing nothing for four years yourself, right. That's your own logic.
See what happens when you put any real thought into your idiotic attempts to taunt people? Kind of makes you look like an even bigger douche bag.
Ah, so just cover your ears, close your eyes, and keep clinging to this desperate diversionary fallacy that it's only murder if they ban it, and not if they just relentlessly lie to everyone about it being poison, like that obviously fake excuse wasn't just debunked right in front of both of us.
What a brilliant strategy there, Napoleon. That'll show me.
Imagine a wife using this defense in court. I didn't FORCE my husband not to take his heart pills to save him from a heart attack, I just lied to him about his life-saving medicine being poison, so that's not murder at all.
Pretty weak and desperate dishonesty you're relying on there.
So the "counterpoints" thus far are:
-trying to twist the fact that tons of hydroxychloroquine went unused due to rampant Democrat lying and scaremongering...to act like that's somehow proof that CNN, NY Times, thousands of doctors and studies are all just lying about hydroxychloroquine working this whole time.
-acting baffled at how anyone could consider it murder to deliberately lie to someone about their life-saving medicine being poison, and like the only real way it could be murder is if they were forcibly kept from taking the drug (good luck using that garbage logic in a court of law).
Welcome to "debating" with the low-IQ left.
^^^ Also, just because this attempt to introduce an obviously stupid and false test to the debate was laughed off the site...doesn't mean there isn't proof that Democrats even DID go to the step of literally banning this life-saving drug.
Finally, States Are Retracting Hydroxychloroquine Bans
saying.jpg
I believe they call this "check and mate" you fucking moron.
Try coming up with adult level arguments next time.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
If there are any Republicans in the country, the Democrats did not murder enough.
THIS IS A TOTAL THREAD FAILURE AND COMPLETE LIE!
YOU TRUMPTARDS ARE SOME STUPID MOTHER-FUCKERS!
THIS IS JUST MORE FAKE NEWS AND LIES!
In this multi-hospital assessment, when controlling for COVID-19 risk factors, treatment with hydroxychloroquine alone and in combination with azithromycin was associated with reduction in COVID-19 associated mortality. Prospective trials are needed to examine this impact.
hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin, 157/783 (20.1% [95% CI: 17.3%–23.0%])
hydroxychloroquine alone, 162/1202 (13.5% [95% CI: 11.6%–15.5%])
azithromycin alone, 33/147 (22.4% [95% CI: 16.0%–30.1%])
and neither drug, 108/409 (26.4% [95% CI: 22.2%–31.0%]).
https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S...534-8/fulltext
Notice that the percentages are pretty consistent?
Good try though. A+
Bookmarks