Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: STALIN-O-CRATS CONTINUE ASSAULT ON CONSITUTIONAL ELECTION RULES

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,653
    Thanks
    18,236
    Thanked 15,664 Times in 10,713 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default STALIN-O-CRATS CONTINUE ASSAULT ON CONSITUTIONAL ELECTION RULES

    " Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors..."


    THE STALIN-O-CRATS ARE TRYNG TO USURP THIS CLEAR STATES' RIGHTS WITH THEIR ILLEGAL, LAUGHABLY NAMED "VOTING RIGHTS" BILL.

    THEY WANT THE ELECTIONS TO BE CONTROLLED BY THE CENTRAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT...IOW....THE DEMOCRAT PARTY.

    SAME SHIT THE NAZIS/SOVIETS/RED CHINESE/KYHMER ROUGE...etc...etc... PULLED.....
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    ExpressLane (06-13-2021), Matt Dillon (06-13-2021), Stone (06-12-2021)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    virginia
    Posts
    8,455
    Thanks
    4,361
    Thanked 5,492 Times in 3,407 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 1,144 Times in 1,049 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    " Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors..."


    THE STALIN-O-CRATS ARE TRYNG TO USURP THIS CLEAR STATES' RIGHTS WITH THEIR ILLEGAL, LAUGHABLY NAMED "VOTING RIGHTS" BILL.

    THEY WANT THE ELECTIONS TO BE CONTROLLED BY THE CENTRAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT...IOW....THE DEMOCRAT PARTY.

    SAME SHIT THE NAZIS/SOVIETS/RED CHINESE/KYHMER ROUGE...etc...etc... PULLED.....
    Democrats want citizens to have free access to the ballot. States, for example, are barred by FEDERAL law from preventing women or people of color from voting. The manner of appointing electors is a separate process the voting rights bill has nothing to do with, as the Supreme Court will make clear if necessary to anyone confused on the matter.
    "Give pearls away and rubies but keep your fancy free."

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to martin For This Post:

    Whythink (06-12-2021)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    24,216
    Thanks
    3,181
    Thanked 10,098 Times in 7,521 Posts
    Groans
    49
    Groaned 1,106 Times in 1,051 Posts

    Default

    The states' right to control voting does exist under our constitution.
    I have to agree with the BB brained mutants on that because it's true.

    If we can't find a way around it, though, then tear the whole republic down.
    It's not worth preserving if right wing sub-humans have any input at all in the lives of we civilized people.
    We not only don't need them but we can't tolerate them either.

    Pachys are a disease.
    Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. Samuel Johnson, 1775
    Religion....is the opiate of the people. Karl Marx, 1848
    Freedom's just another word for nothin' left to lose. Kris Kristofferson, 1969

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    23,527
    Thanks
    4,290
    Thanked 10,269 Times in 7,151 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 1,197 Times in 1,112 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by martin View Post
    Democrats want citizens to have free access to the ballot. States, for example, are barred by FEDERAL law from preventing women or people of color from voting. The manner of appointing electors is a separate process the voting rights bill has nothing to do with, as the Supreme Court will make clear if necessary to anyone confused on the matter.
    " Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors..."

    OK! AND............................................... ..?

    I'm still waiting for GROK's PUNCH LINE?

    So what is it that has his panties in a wad?


  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,653
    Thanks
    18,236
    Thanked 15,664 Times in 10,713 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by martin View Post
    Democrats want citizens to have free access to the ballot. States, for example, are barred by FEDERAL law from preventing women or people of color from voting. The manner of appointing electors is a separate process the voting rights bill has nothing to do with, as the Supreme Court will make clear if necessary to anyone confused on the matter.
    DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE FUCK THEY "WANT"; THE CONSTITUTION IS QUITE CLEAR ON WHO GETS TO DETERMINE THE MANNER OF THE ELECTIONS...REREAD THE OP AND FIGURE OUT THE ANSWER.

    DEMOCRATS CANNOT ALTER THE CONSTITUTION WITHOUT AN AMENDMENT.

    THERE IS NO STATE WHERE CITIZENS DO NOT HAVE FREE ACCESS TO VOTE. NOWHERE. THE STALIN-O-CRAST ARE TRYIG TO MAKE NO ID, NO VERIFICATION "MAIL IN VOTING" THE NORM.


    AMERICANS DO NOT WANT THIS SHIT.
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    Matt Dillon (06-13-2021)

  9. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,653
    Thanks
    18,236
    Thanked 15,664 Times in 10,713 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Geeko Sportivo View Post
    " Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors..."

    OK! AND............................................... ..?

    I'm still waiting for GROK's PUNCH LINE?

    So what is it that has his panties in a wad?

    YOU'RE TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND...
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  10. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,653
    Thanks
    18,236
    Thanked 15,664 Times in 10,713 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NiftyNiblick View Post
    The states' right to control voting does exist under our constitution.
    I have to agree with the BB brained mutants on that because it's true.

    If we can't find a way around it, though, then tear the whole republic down.
    It's not worth preserving if right wing sub-humans have any input at all in the lives of we civilized people.
    We not only don't need them but we can't tolerate them either.

    Pachys are a disease.
    NO; LET THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DECIDE ,NOT THE FRAUDOCRATS.

    WE DO NOT WANT UNVERIFIED, UNVETTED MAIL IN VOTING TO BE THE "NORM", FOR OBVIOUS REASONS.

    AMERICANS OVERWHLMINGLY WANT IN PERSON VOTING ,WITH PHOTO IDs.


    AMERICANS DO NOT WANT THE STALIN-O-CRATS TAKING OVER OUR ELECTIONS; IF YOU BELIEVE OTHERWISE, AMEND THE FUCKING CONSTITUTITON TO ALLOW IT.


    GOOD LUCK WITH THAT SHIT...

    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  11. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    23,527
    Thanks
    4,290
    Thanked 10,269 Times in 7,151 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 1,197 Times in 1,112 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    YOU'RE TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND...
    Are you unable to make your point?

    We are still waiting!

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,653
    Thanks
    18,236
    Thanked 15,664 Times in 10,713 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Geeko Sportivo View Post
    Are you unable to make your point?

    We are still waiting!
    THE POINT IS MADE YOU FUCKING MORON. YOU'RE JUST TOO STUPID TO GRAPS EVEN THE SIMPLEST POINTS.


    HAVE ONE OF THE GROWNUPS EXPLAIN THIS TO YOU:

    WE DO NOT WANT UNVERIFIED, UNVETTED MAIL IN VOTING TO BE THE "NORM", FOR OBVIOUS REASONS.

    AMERICANS OVERWHLMINGLY WANT IN PERSON VOTING ,WITH PHOTO IDs.


    AMERICANS DO NOT WANT THE STALIN-O-CRATS TAKING OVER OUR ELECTIONS; IF YOU BELIEVE OTHERWISE, AMEND THE FUCKING CONSTITUTITON TO ALLOW IT.


    GOOD LUCK WITH THAT SHIT...
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    23,527
    Thanks
    4,290
    Thanked 10,269 Times in 7,151 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 1,197 Times in 1,112 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    THE POINT IS MADE YOU FUCKING MORON. YOU'RE JUST TOO STUPID TO GRAPS EVEN THE SIMPLEST POINTS.


    HAVE ONE OF THE GROWNUPS EXPLAIN THIS TO YOU:

    WE DO NOT WANT UNVERIFIED, UNVETTED MAIL IN VOTING TO BE THE "NORM", FOR OBVIOUS REASONS.

    AMERICANS OVERWHLMINGLY WANT IN PERSON VOTING ,WITH PHOTO IDs.


    AMERICANS DO NOT WANT THE STALIN-O-CRATS TAKING OVER OUR ELECTIONS; IF YOU BELIEVE OTHERWISE, AMEND THE FUCKING CONSTITUTITON TO ALLOW IT.


    GOOD LUCK WITH THAT SHIT...
    Why don't you chill out and stop with this "THE SKY IS FALLING" approach?

    It didn't work for CHICKEN -LITTLE and it won't work for you either.

    First of all, no one knows what a STALIN-O-CRAT even is. MUST BE SOMETHING YOU MADE UP!

    WE? WHO IS WE? More Republicans vote Absentee than any other group of voters. ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT THEM TO BE UPSET BY TAKING THEIR PRIVILEGE AWAY?

    This is where the RED STATES are chopping their own dicks off- AND THE GOVERNORS AND STATE OFFICIALS THAT ARE PUSHING THESE CHANGES ARE UPSETTING THE VOTERS- BOTH REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRAT!

    THERE IS GONNA BE A LOT OF RED STATES GOING BLUE NOW!

    Americans do not want these Voter Suppression laws!

    SO it is amazing watching these RED STATES CHOP THEIR OWN NUTS OFF!

    It is only going to have a reverse effect!

  14. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    virginia
    Posts
    8,455
    Thanks
    4,361
    Thanked 5,492 Times in 3,407 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 1,144 Times in 1,049 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE FUCK THEY "WANT"; THE CONSTITUTION IS QUITE CLEAR ON WHO GETS TO DETERMINE THE MANNER OF THE ELECTIONS...REREAD THE OP AND FIGURE OUT THE ANSWER.

    DEMOCRATS CANNOT ALTER THE CONSTITUTION WITHOUT AN AMENDMENT.

    THERE IS NO STATE WHERE CITIZENS DO NOT HAVE FREE ACCESS TO VOTE. NOWHERE. THE STALIN-O-CRAST ARE TRYIG TO MAKE NO ID, NO VERIFICATION "MAIL IN VOTING" THE NORM.


    AMERICANS DO NOT WANT THIS SHIT.
    To cite one of your examples to keep things simple, if a state decides that documentary ID is not required for voting eligibility, that is a question unrelated to the elector appointment clause you are harping on. Also there is nothing in The Constitution that grants states the sole power "to determine the manner of (federal) elections".
    "Give pearls away and rubies but keep your fancy free."

  15. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,653
    Thanks
    18,236
    Thanked 15,664 Times in 10,713 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Geeko Sportivo View Post
    Why don't you chill out and stop with this "THE SKY IS FALLING" approach?

    It didn't work for CHICKEN -LITTLE and it won't work for you either.

    First of all, no one knows what a STALIN-O-CRAT even is. MUST BE SOMETHING YOU MADE UP!

    WE? WHO IS WE? More Republicans vote Absentee than any other group of voters. ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT THEM TO BE UPSET BY TAKING THEIR PRIVILEGE AWAY?

    This is where the RED STATES are chopping their own dicks off- AND THE GOVERNORS AND STATE OFFICIALS THAT ARE PUSHING THESE CHANGES ARE UPSETTING THE VOTERS- BOTH REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRAT!

    THERE IS GONNA BE A LOT OF RED STATES GOING BLUE NOW!

    Americans do not want these Voter Suppression laws!

    SO it is amazing watching these RED STATES CHOP THEIR OWN NUTS OFF!

    It is only going to have a reverse effect!
    WHY DON'T THE TREASONOCRATS STOP VIOLATING THE CONSITTUTION?
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  16. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,653
    Thanks
    18,236
    Thanked 15,664 Times in 10,713 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by martin View Post
    To cite one of your examples to keep things simple, if a state decides that documentary ID is not required for voting eligibility, that is a question unrelated to the elector appointment clause you are harping on. Also there is nothing in The Constitution that grants states the sole power "to determine the manner of (federal) elections".
    YOU'RE THICKER THAN A WALL.

    THE STATES HAVE THE AUTHORITY IN EVERYTHING RELATIVE TO THEIR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS. THAT IS WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "MANNER" THE LEGISLATURE THERE DETERMINES.

    THE STALIN-O-CRATS ARE TRYING TO USURP THE STATES AUTHORITY TO DO SO, WHICH INCLUDES IDs AND EBRYTHING ELSE...LIKE NOT ALLOWING UNVEETED , UNVERIFIED MAIL IN BALLOTS TO BE THE NEW NATIONAL "NORM".


    TAKE A FUCKING CIVICS CLASS, FROM A NON-MARXIST PROF....IF YOU CAN FIND ONE.
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  17. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Location
    virginia
    Posts
    8,455
    Thanks
    4,361
    Thanked 5,492 Times in 3,407 Posts
    Groans
    4
    Groaned 1,144 Times in 1,049 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    YOU'RE THICKER THAN A WALL.

    THE STATES HAVE THE AUTHORITY IN EVERYTHING RELATIVE TO THEIR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS. THAT IS WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "MANNER" THE LEGISLATURE THERE DETERMINES.

    THE STALIN-O-CRATS ARE TRYING TO USURP THE STATES AUTHORITY TO DO SO, WHICH INCLUDES IDs AND EBRYTHING ELSE...LIKE NOT ALLOWING UNVEETED , UNVERIFIED MAIL IN BALLOTS TO BE THE NEW NATIONAL "NORM".


    TAKE A FUCKING CIVICS CLASS, FROM A NON-MARXIST PROF....IF YOU CAN FIND ONE.
    If you would calm down, cool the insults, and think, there's a chance you'd perceive that the words "elections" and "electors" have different meanings. Were states were able to determine "everything relative to their Presidential elections" they could determine that only men over the age of forty, having reported incomes the prior year of at least two hundred thousand dollars, and owning a horse, would be eligible to vote. States have no such authority, obviously. Federal election laws mandate some of the "manner" by which their Presidential elections are held, including certain mandatory eligibility requirements. Whether or not it would be within the Federal government's authority to forbid states from denying voter eligibility solely on the basis of lack of documentary evidence would be a question for the Supreme Court but the answer wouldn't be
    guided by the "appointment of electors" clause.
    "Give pearls away and rubies but keep your fancy free."

  18. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    23,527
    Thanks
    4,290
    Thanked 10,269 Times in 7,151 Posts
    Groans
    3
    Groaned 1,197 Times in 1,112 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    WHY DON'T THE TREASONOCRATS STOP VIOLATING THE CONSITTUTION?
    The Democrats are not doing anything unconstitutional!

    In fact the Democrats are trying to persuade your Red States to stop violating the Constitution with Unconstitutional laws that won't hold up in any court.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-15-2023, 09:50 PM
  2. When Will the STALIN-O-CRATS Release the Intell IG's Testimony???
    By Grokmaster in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-05-2020, 02:44 PM
  3. STALIN-O-CRATS ENGAGED IN COVER UP of IG's TESTIMONY
    By Grokmaster in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-03-2020, 11:49 PM
  4. Articles are UN-PROSECUTABLE...as the STALIN-O-CRATS KNOW.
    By Grokmaster in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-24-2020, 10:43 PM
  5. Turley Exposes the Stalin-O-Crats as the Idiots They Are.
    By Grokmaster in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-05-2019, 10:35 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •