ExpressLane (06-13-2021), Matt Dillon (06-13-2021), Stone (06-12-2021)
" Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors..."
THE STALIN-O-CRATS ARE TRYNG TO USURP THIS CLEAR STATES' RIGHTS WITH THEIR ILLEGAL, LAUGHABLY NAMED "VOTING RIGHTS" BILL.
THEY WANT THE ELECTIONS TO BE CONTROLLED BY THE CENTRAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT...IOW....THE DEMOCRAT PARTY.
SAME SHIT THE NAZIS/SOVIETS/RED CHINESE/KYHMER ROUGE...etc...etc... PULLED.....
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
ExpressLane (06-13-2021), Matt Dillon (06-13-2021), Stone (06-12-2021)
Democrats want citizens to have free access to the ballot. States, for example, are barred by FEDERAL law from preventing women or people of color from voting. The manner of appointing electors is a separate process the voting rights bill has nothing to do with, as the Supreme Court will make clear if necessary to anyone confused on the matter.
"Give pearls away and rubies but keep your fancy free."
Whythink (06-12-2021)
The states' right to control voting does exist under our constitution.
I have to agree with the BB brained mutants on that because it's true.
If we can't find a way around it, though, then tear the whole republic down.
It's not worth preserving if right wing sub-humans have any input at all in the lives of we civilized people.
We not only don't need them but we can't tolerate them either.
Pachys are a disease.
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. Samuel Johnson, 1775
Religion....is the opiate of the people. Karl Marx, 1848
Freedom's just another word for nothin' left to lose. Kris Kristofferson, 1969
DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE FUCK THEY "WANT"; THE CONSTITUTION IS QUITE CLEAR ON WHO GETS TO DETERMINE THE MANNER OF THE ELECTIONS...REREAD THE OP AND FIGURE OUT THE ANSWER.
DEMOCRATS CANNOT ALTER THE CONSTITUTION WITHOUT AN AMENDMENT.
THERE IS NO STATE WHERE CITIZENS DO NOT HAVE FREE ACCESS TO VOTE. NOWHERE. THE STALIN-O-CRAST ARE TRYIG TO MAKE NO ID, NO VERIFICATION "MAIL IN VOTING" THE NORM.
AMERICANS DO NOT WANT THIS SHIT.
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
Matt Dillon (06-13-2021)
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
NO; LET THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DECIDE ,NOT THE FRAUDOCRATS.
WE DO NOT WANT UNVERIFIED, UNVETTED MAIL IN VOTING TO BE THE "NORM", FOR OBVIOUS REASONS.
AMERICANS OVERWHLMINGLY WANT IN PERSON VOTING ,WITH PHOTO IDs.
AMERICANS DO NOT WANT THE STALIN-O-CRATS TAKING OVER OUR ELECTIONS; IF YOU BELIEVE OTHERWISE, AMEND THE FUCKING CONSTITUTITON TO ALLOW IT.
GOOD LUCK WITH THAT SHIT...
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
THE POINT IS MADE YOU FUCKING MORON. YOU'RE JUST TOO STUPID TO GRAPS EVEN THE SIMPLEST POINTS.
HAVE ONE OF THE GROWNUPS EXPLAIN THIS TO YOU:
WE DO NOT WANT UNVERIFIED, UNVETTED MAIL IN VOTING TO BE THE "NORM", FOR OBVIOUS REASONS.
AMERICANS OVERWHLMINGLY WANT IN PERSON VOTING ,WITH PHOTO IDs.
AMERICANS DO NOT WANT THE STALIN-O-CRATS TAKING OVER OUR ELECTIONS; IF YOU BELIEVE OTHERWISE, AMEND THE FUCKING CONSTITUTITON TO ALLOW IT.
GOOD LUCK WITH THAT SHIT...
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
Why don't you chill out and stop with this "THE SKY IS FALLING" approach?
It didn't work for CHICKEN -LITTLE and it won't work for you either.
First of all, no one knows what a STALIN-O-CRAT even is. MUST BE SOMETHING YOU MADE UP!
WE? WHO IS WE? More Republicans vote Absentee than any other group of voters. ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT THEM TO BE UPSET BY TAKING THEIR PRIVILEGE AWAY?
This is where the RED STATES are chopping their own dicks off- AND THE GOVERNORS AND STATE OFFICIALS THAT ARE PUSHING THESE CHANGES ARE UPSETTING THE VOTERS- BOTH REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRAT!
THERE IS GONNA BE A LOT OF RED STATES GOING BLUE NOW!
Americans do not want these Voter Suppression laws!
SO it is amazing watching these RED STATES CHOP THEIR OWN NUTS OFF!
It is only going to have a reverse effect!
To cite one of your examples to keep things simple, if a state decides that documentary ID is not required for voting eligibility, that is a question unrelated to the elector appointment clause you are harping on. Also there is nothing in The Constitution that grants states the sole power "to determine the manner of (federal) elections".
"Give pearls away and rubies but keep your fancy free."
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
YOU'RE THICKER THAN A WALL.
THE STATES HAVE THE AUTHORITY IN EVERYTHING RELATIVE TO THEIR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS. THAT IS WHAT IS MEANT BY THE "MANNER" THE LEGISLATURE THERE DETERMINES.
THE STALIN-O-CRATS ARE TRYING TO USURP THE STATES AUTHORITY TO DO SO, WHICH INCLUDES IDs AND EBRYTHING ELSE...LIKE NOT ALLOWING UNVEETED , UNVERIFIED MAIL IN BALLOTS TO BE THE NEW NATIONAL "NORM".
TAKE A FUCKING CIVICS CLASS, FROM A NON-MARXIST PROF....IF YOU CAN FIND ONE.
TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..
De Oppresso Liber
If you would calm down, cool the insults, and think, there's a chance you'd perceive that the words "elections" and "electors" have different meanings. Were states were able to determine "everything relative to their Presidential elections" they could determine that only men over the age of forty, having reported incomes the prior year of at least two hundred thousand dollars, and owning a horse, would be eligible to vote. States have no such authority, obviously. Federal election laws mandate some of the "manner" by which their Presidential elections are held, including certain mandatory eligibility requirements. Whether or not it would be within the Federal government's authority to forbid states from denying voter eligibility solely on the basis of lack of documentary evidence would be a question for the Supreme Court but the answer wouldn't be
guided by the "appointment of electors" clause.
"Give pearls away and rubies but keep your fancy free."
Bookmarks