Aint no Ho like an old Ho. Although,....she is starting to REALLY look rough, real rough. Lookin like THAT Im pretty sure she's not gonna be able to Ho no Mo.
Shamala became visibly frustrated during an interview on Thursday after they pressed her on when she plans to visit the U.S.-Mexico border to see Biden’s border crisis firsthand.
The interaction, which came during an interview with Univision anchor Ilia Calderón, followed a rocky week for Shamala as she repeatedly struggled during her taxpayer-funded jet jaunt to Central America.
“I’ve said I’m going to the border,” Shamala told the anchor. “And I-”
“When are you going to the border, Vice President?” Calderón interrupted.
“I’m not finished,” Shamala said, and then cackled. “I’ve said I’m going to the border.”
Aint no Ho like an old Ho. Although,....she is starting to REALLY look rough, real rough. Lookin like THAT Im pretty sure she's not gonna be able to Ho no Mo.
She’s so terrible at this.
That’s been the predominant theme of Shamala’s career since she burst onto the national stage in 2019 as a leading presidential contender.
By the end of the year, after much fanfare and an untold amount of unearned media, Shamala dropped out before the first primary, not even cracking the top contenders in her own home state.
Shamala's failure theater continued this week as she jetted to Guatemala to investigate the “root causes” of the migration crisis.
She was quickly corrected by none other than Guatemala’s president, who explained that it is her administration’s policies that have caused the surge.
At this point in her face-plant term, Shamala has clearly lost her patience.
This is a woman who is used to being lauded and worshiped by the media as an absolute queen among the little people.
That led to this very awkward situation where she snapped at a reporter today.
Why is she so mad?
And what exactly is so funny in this line of questioning that she needed to break out that ridiculous cackle she calls a laugh?
The reporter’s inquiry was a question that Shamala should be more than prepared to field at this point.
There are no surprises here, unless Shamala truly expects the media to keep kissing her ass forever.
https://redstate.com/bonchie/2021/06/10/kamala-harris-failure-theater-continues-as-she-snaps-at-a-reporter-n394895
Shamala was not happy about being publicly associated with the Mexican border, and after her disastrous interview with NBC’s Lester Holt and her flailing trip to Mexico and Guatemala, we can see why she would be generally leery of public-facing responsibilities.
The entire excursion was a fiasco in just about every possible way, even down to her plane having to turn around and return to Andrews Air Force Base half an hour into its flight.
Shamala has never handled criticism or probing questions well, even by the prickly standards of politicians.
She tends to react with a combination of scorn and bizarrely out-of-place laughter when asked questions that she does not want to answer.
It has never been clear if the laughter is an involuntary, nervous defense mechanism, a gesture of contempt, or some sort of deliberate strategy to soften the blow of a non-answer, but it invariably backfires.
The Holt interview showcased Shamala at her worst.
This was roundly mocked, as even border-district DEMOCRATS in Congress have been pressing her to visit, but she did it again in Mexico City, laughing and rolling her eyes when asked to commit to such a visit:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/06/kamala-harriss-very-bad-trip-south/
Despite being theoretically well-placed to dominate the 2020 DEMOCRAT primary, she dropped out of the race in December of 2019 because nobody much would vote for her.
That Shamala is unpopular should come as no great surprise, given that she somehow manages to combine into a single package a transparent insincerity, an unvarnished authoritarianism, and a tendency toward self-satisfied progressivism.
If her apologists wish to, they can pretend that the reaction Shamala provokes is “gendered” or “systemic” or “inequitable” or whatever other bastardized academic term is fashionable this week, and they should feel free to knock themselves out doing so.
Deep down, though, they must know that America isn’t the problem here.
The problem is that Shamala is a phony.
It remains the case that, throughout her entire public career, almost nobody has looked at Shamala and thought, “Yes, she’s the person we need to lead us.”
Sure, she’s won a couple of elections. But even in deep blue California, she has struggled.
Her 2010 victory in the attorney general’s race was decided by just 74,000 votes out of more than 9.6 million cast, and ended up being so close that it took three weeks before the result was finally clear.
What about Shamala’s performance as vice president do we expect will change this dynamic?
It’s now been two months since she was publicly selected to lead the illegitimate Biden regime’s response to the roiling border crisis, and not only has she declined to visit the region even once, but, when asked about her absence, she has delivered her trademark dismissive laugh.
It seems indisputable that the DEMOCRAT Party has a real interest in Harris being more popular than she is.
Joe Biden is 78 years old — older than any president has ever been at any point in American history.
There is no guarantee that Biden will finish his first term, and there is even less of a guarantee that he will be alive to run again in 2024.
In either case, when Biden leaves the White House, Shamala will be his presumptive heir, and, in both cases, the DEMOCRAT Party — which explicitly put Harris on the ticket in 2020 because she is a female minority — will struggle mightily.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/05/the-democrats-have-a-kamala-harris-problem
The Chinese are laughing at us....kicking our asses is going to be so much easier than they had planned on.
I choose my own words like the Americans of olden times........before this dystopia arrived.
DARK AGES SUCK!
Bookmarks